wolfgang

Yₒᵤ ₛₜₐᵣₑ ᵢₙₜₒ ₜₕₑ ₐbyₛₛ… ⋆

【ＡＮＤ　ＴＨＥ　ＡＢＹＳＳ　ＳＴＡＲＥＳ　ＢＡＣＫ．】

── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ────

A ningen approches.

╰┈➤ Names ,,, Phantom ⋆ Elizabeth ⋆ Dhalia ⋆ Jazmin ⋆ Dana ⋆ Ghost ╰┈➤ Gender(s) ,,, Genderfae ⋆ Ethergender ⋆ Gendervoid ╰┈➤ Pronouns ,,, she/her ⋆ it/its ⋆ they/them ⋆ voi/void/voids/voids/voidself ╰┈➤ Sexuality ,,, berrisexual ╰┈➤ Species ,,, cat humanoid ╰┈➤ Age ,,, 19 ╰┈➤ Roles ,,, Controller (which is what you were looking for) ╰┈➤ Faceclaim

no idea if this is a specific character or something. I just googled catgirl and this was the first thing that came up.

── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ──── ⋆⋅𖤓⋅⋆ ────

This was really fun to make. Thank you for your request!

That aside, you claim to understand ‘almost the entirety of psychology,’ which is not plausible. There is a reason why there are so many different fields of expertise within psychology, there is a lot of information on even the smallest topics, and to claim to understand “almost everything” is not within the realm of possibility. Psychology is massive: cognitive, developmental, clinical, neuropsychological, social, evolutionary, forensic, industrial-organizational... and each subfield has decades of research. Your statement is clearly the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

After looking at your account, I do not believe you to be very old. It appears as if you are a minor, a young adult or simply an extremely immature adult. Given your level of (im)maturity, this only strengthens my case that you do not understand nearly as much as you think you do. To become proficient in psychology, there are years of study involved, which it doesn’t appear you have.

However, I do not believe to have said anything ageist. I am in no way saying young people cannot be smart or understand certain topics. However, it is a fact that in order to become proficient in psychology, you need years upon years of education, and typically, children and younger teenagers do not have that education as 1: There’s a significant chance it doesn’t interest them (yet or ever), and 2: Even if it did interest them, they don’t have access to that professional education yet due to not being old enough to pursue a degree in psychology. That is not ageist, that is simply factual.

In this post, you claimed to ‘understand almost everything about psychology,’ which is what I addressed. “Almost everything” is significantly more than understanding it to ‘a degree,’ which I appreciate you changed your wording on.

sidenote: "psychogology"..?

That aside, you claim to understand ‘almost the entirety of psychology,’ which is not plausible. There is a reason why there are so many different fields of expertise within psychology, there is a lot of information on even the smallest topics, and to claim to understand “almost everything” is not within the realm of possibility. Psychology is massive: cognitive, developmental, clinical, neuropsychological, social, evolutionary, forensic, industrial-organizational... and each subfield has decades of research. Your statement is clearly the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

After looking at your account, I do not believe you to be very old. It appears as if you are a minor, a young adult or simply an extremely immature adult. Given your level of (im)maturity, this only strengthens my case that you do not understand nearly as much as you think you do. To become proficient in psychology, there are years of study involved, which it doesn’t appear you have.