WEEK 5&6 (CONTINUATION OF INTERVIEW WITH CEA STUDENTS)
WEEK 5
The group wanted to acquire more data to make sure that the group's favored product would be sellable in the future. This week, we continued to interview different students from the CEA department.
Again, the questions were:
1. What are your daily struggles as an (Engineering/Architecture) Student?
2. What is the most convenient/cheapest (engineering/architectural) tool you have?
3. What is the most expensive tool you have yet most useful?
4. As an (engineering/architecture) student, which of the following tools do you think is the most useful?
- A Measuring Tool - A Cutting Tool or - A Planner
5. Why do you prefer this tool?
The group experienced a lot of REJECTION since some of the students were shy, busy, or they are just not in the CEA department.
Hypothesis: The group anticipated that we can hit our quota by conducting an interview this week.
Experiment: The group interviewed random students in the CEA department.
Result: Because of the many rejections, we failed to hit our quota for the week.
Action: The group decided to continue the interview by next week.
WEEK 6
The ABCD group once again gathered in the school for the interview continuation. The group comes up with a strategy to make the interview easier and faster. Since this is a group of four members, we decided to split into two groups, Kier and I were partners while the other was Oliver and Alvin. We asked the same questions to some random students from the CEA department.
Hypothesis: The group expected to hit our quota this time.
Experiment: We split into two groups to fasten the interview and also this way we can gather more data.
Result: The group successfully hit the quota.
Action: The group compiled all of the data gathered and also proofs that we conducted those interviews for the past productive weeks.





















