Not a FNAF post but I wanted to write on the nature of objects and living spaces. Vague spoilers for Disco Elysium, The Backrooms movie and The Stanley Parable. I also want to preface that these ideas are not original, nor mine. I am not the first person to think of these concepts, but learning about them has radically changed how I view the world.
I've always been fascinated with how Harry Dubois can interact with objects and Revachol itself (the city he and Kim find themselves in). He speaks with objects, who have stories and histories to share, and help him on his cases. The city itself seems alive, and waiting for some kind of change (that Harry will be part of). The city loves him and its people as a parent would.
This made me think about how objects are part of us. Humans (I'd argue) are part of nature, not separate from it, and objects are made by us from things found in nature (even if we have to alter them beyond their original states). Objects have a history associated with their makeup and the people who possess them. They can also be altered or used to make up something else (through varies forms or art, for instance). So to me it makes sense we are attached to certain objects, and I also think there are anti capitalist arguments about what happens when we overconsume/throw these objects away. There is less value to an object under capitalist and overconsumption, I think.
In the Stanley Parable, the room(s) Stanley find himself in is alive. It changes, and is perhaps made human by the presence of the narrator. Is the narrator another human, or is he actually part of the space? Is the space so alive that it is inherently human? Do we make spaces human because we live in them and create them?
My one mutual mentioned that The Backrooms movie is similar, but in different ways. The Backrooms exists because of us, but aren't necessarily created for us and by us. I think the Backrooms as a concept is generally hostile to humans. We aren't meant to live in these spaces. There is something off about them. The Backrooms are shaped by the characters in the film (and more generally by humans and memory). I think memory plays a huge part in how buildings and rooms come alive, and this is so integral to the Backrooms. Especially when we get into the nostalgia of liminal spaces in general. They are shaped by human memory, but like human memory they are imperfect. Something about them is off and ever changing, like how memory is every changing and shaped by human experience. Collective memory plays a huge role in this as well.
Buildings, rooms and spaces coming alive via memory ties back to Disco Elysium too. The objects that speak to Harry have a story to tell. Of who possessed them and what they have seen. The city gives Harry snippets of the everyday lives of the people living within it, so it seems to hold a collective memory (including of more recent past events, so why not assume it holds events of the far past as well)?
All of this being said, maybe the connection objects, buildings and entire cities have to us makes them more alive then I could have ever realized. Maybe memory, and the idea that human made objects are more part of nature than we (in this case I) think, makes them alive. That isn't to say how we currently create and consume isn't harmful to the planet and the environment, but maybe shifting the way we see objects and buildings (ect) could change things.
I just want to add at the end that my post isn't formal essay writing lol, so my thoughts are probably a bit all over the place. Maybe I could write something more formal in future, but that would be much longer than a Tumblr post lol. I'm not an expert on this topic at all so if you have more to add that would be awesome! I just wanted to get the thoughts floating around in my brain out there, but this post doesnât even scratch the surface of this topic.