𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖊.

the admin did approach us, and while we told them that we would not disclose any identification to them, we also told them who the original poster was not, in response to a mun's name they mentioned first when approaching us!

this is important, because as part of us making a timeline of the proof submitted and the events in the krp, we noted that there was only one person removed during/after the timestamps of the events (according to the tumblr itself) and before we received most of our proof (in various dms, with timestamped conversations). this person was cleared when we could verify they were not the original poster, and so as far as we can tell, the involved anons are either still in the group, or have yet to have their removal be announced! in this instance, since there is only one account that could be referenced that would no longer be in the krp in relation to this situation, we think that it is misleading to present information this way:

i do not know if the sender is still in the group ,  and i refuse to pour all the effort i do into a group where i have to constantly worry that someone has so little respect for the community and myself that they opt for hateful anonymous venting instead of seeking constructive solutions to help their community grow ; where i have to constantly worry that i’m leaving members vulnerable to being subject to this kind of behavior by having them stay in a group with this person .

when the admin is aware of the fact that the sender must be in their group. this language has the potential to be quite harmful! it would be very easy for the current krp members to assume that it is the single account that has been removed that submitted the angry anon when we have definitive, identifying proof that the original sender and the member that left are different! if there are more candidates unlisted on the blog leading to the admin's concern, it would be important to add that it is due to the fact that they have yet to post more removals, so that the heat is not on the one member that they know is not the sender.

to add context as to why it is important for us to make this clarification, it is very clear from the volume of proof we have been given that members in the krp strongly feel that the narrative is that the removed member submitted the original message to our blog, but that is simply not true. given that this is clearly a strong theory, to the point where the admin mentioned this mun to us when approaching us, this post from the admin will only serve to further bring baseless hate on the removed member. we can't personally understand why the admin would not seek to clarify the obvious opinion that they are aware their community has when we have told them that it cannot be true. this, to us, contradicts the admin's point about the culture they wish to cultivate, or their strict stance on avoiding drama, as they continue to allow their community to have misconceptions that have already had consequences.

the original poster's main point was also unrelated to the circumstances around the departed member's situation, and only used the krp's current situation to vent about their issues. for this reason we think that this post can send baseless hate on the removed member for simply being removed at the time they chose to leave, with nothing else tying them to the post sent to us.

edited to omit the [strong language], the privated post:

the admin is [being confusing]. they said ooc if an ic pair did something against canon (the krp has predetermined roles and endings etc for each muse, ur goal is to play the chara not build it) then it would have ic fallout. but then the members did the thing anyways, which is allowed under the admin's rules, and then the admin [reacted to it harmfully*, involving most of the krp]

*harmfully is the best way we think we can articulate the anon's feelings, these don't represent our opinions! if nuance is being lost, someone else is free to provide a better way to word this, as we are not trying to change any part of the post's meaning!

the post mentions nothing about the situation that (from what we are able to understand) isn't common knowledge. from the polls on the tumblr, there seems to be general discussion about the future path the krp will take in result of the event that occurred. these decisions will affect every member in the krp so it is not a far reach to say that there could be a disgruntled mun in the krp venting on our blog about the way the situation was handled, and that this larger discussion involving all of the krp is what the anon is discussing as opposed to anything that involves the removed mun. we bring this up as we also told the admin that the anon whose submission we privated had issues that were mainly unrelated to anything involving the removed mun. so despite us telling them explicitly the removed mun is not the original sender, and that the original ask was largely about the rp itself and not any specific incident involving the mun that left, the admin's post here doesn't absolve the removed mun but continues to implicate them!

there are two additional removals posted, and neither of those blogs match the original anon's blog for hqrise (they sent an off anon ask to us from the blog to prove this to us from the beginning), so as of us writing this post there is no removal posted that is the anon that originally spoke to us! this means that, provided the admin is not behind on removals, the anon that submitted the original ask is still in the krp!

we do not make posts about the situations we deal with unless there is substantial reason to do so. we simply allow conversation to continue on the topic, or choose not to post those anons depending on what the outcome of our sorting is. we really think this called for our clarification however! while we understand the toll this can take in a krp, we have still not sorted through all the proof sent to us, and as such, haven't made a firm decision on whether to allow the conversation to keep going or not. once we do, we will move along!

we would like to reiterate that this post is not us taking a side on either situation as that is not our job, and we have not fully come to our conclusions about the matter to be sure of what is the objective truth. this is only to add necessary parts of the story that the admin is omitting, and that we think can be very harmful as a result!

here is our only correspondence with the hqrise team! as of this post being written, the admin has not asked for us to help clarify any part of the events that occurred! we were not aware of this post either, and simply had good luck meeting to work through the proof we had received when we saw it.

here is a portion of our conversation with an involved party (the mun the admin referenced when approaching us and we blacked out in the above screenshots), telling them we were okay with them disclosing to the members in the krp and the admin that the original anon was not them. this was done after we had seen proof of their accounts and blog and could confirm it was not the same blog as the blog in our inbox, and not the same account on discord.

additionally, the post was made private, not deleted, as we were being presented with a lot of proof to go through! we decided it was for the best to private the post and only unprivate it or delete it once we knew if it was valid or not and could see if it was harmful in context or not. the admin had no way of knowing whether or not the post was deleted or privated, we are only mentioning this as it might confuse those we are speaking to who were told we privated it!

u guys can believe what u want. u know exactly what kind of admin i am and have been to every single member of this group. if u think i threw away a plot i spent half a year writing, threw away hours i spent helping individual members with detailed character work and answering anons in extensive detail, for the sole reason of bringing hate down on any ex or current member/s then u can believe that. if u think i wanted anything but the best for a community i literally started then u can believe that.

at the end of the day none of this would happen if vent blogs didn't exist. vent blogs are a parasite to this community that bring more harm than good. whatever accountability for writers and admins u encourage is immensely undermined by the resulting environment of mistrust and invasion of privacy you create. allowing anyone to say and submit anything, allowing people's private conversations to be spread without their consent for any reason, far beyond the borders of a community they elected to join, cancels out and far outweighs any potential benefits you claim to bring to the community.