HenryandNatea

Source of the interview?

Yeah I’m not surprised either, I was more surprised she has active Zionist friends. Also agreed, their silence on it says it all.

Well it turns out, Natalie Viscuso is friends with a Zionist. I don’t use the term Zionist lightly as there has to be a lot of evidence in order for a person to be called that, since anti semitism is a real thing. During her actual employment with Legendary, at the Golden Globes party she was partying with a coworker/ friend which she tagged. As you can see from his profile… he’s a Zionist. And also follows the IDF and other Zionist orgz. Natalie still hasn’t unfollowed him. This is inexcusable since she is very picky with her socials and not only what she posts, but who she follows.

Exactly. Again, if what they were saying about the relationship, the career aspects etc was true, they wouldn’t spend hours on their own tumblrs and Instagram trying to defend/ explain it. The truth would stand for itself.

I agree with all of this. And emphasis on “The thing is that there is a lot of force from their side to change opinions of very few people who probably don't want to believe a narrative being fed to them now I am not going to judge who is right who is wrong but why are they forcing people to believe something so badly if it's already true” this applies to what I said about the stans too.

No one is doubting she worked for Weinstein, or Legendary. As I said before, she had a lot to be proud of! AND she had the work to show for it. The account you’re mentioning tried to say Natalie was also a Vice President of Legendary, when she was only listed as a studio executive on comic con sites and on her IMDb and credits. As for Vertigo, Natalie wouldn’t have empty credits even if she oversees production. Anything in movies and tv, even if just overseeing it, is very hands on. There’s meetings that can’t only be remote. The fact that she thinks Roy Lee and Andrew Childs don’t work remote saying “how do you know” to some commenter… says a lot in the lack of knowledge. I don’t think she’s from Bosnia, but if she is from Bosnia, then no one would take her seriously when A. She doesn’t work in the business and is a fan account, and B. The way both countries work is different. And at the end of the day, she’s preaching to her followers and fellow “demon squad” members. People who work in the biz who look into Natalie’s “job” would know off the bat the Vice President title is for pr/ press. There’s a fan account’s words that reaches women who are fans from ages 18-60, then there’s the separate truth and reality. And yes, I have also noticed they’ve been spamming their stories more than usual lately. But I’d like you to explain more on the different style of writing, because it looks just as chaotic to me.

Her Instagram story showed a screenshot of the article that said “Season 4 highlights her role, in part because it eases the transition to a new Geralt, but also because it is time for Ciri to take her place as The Witcher's hero.” To me that doesn’t read as in mourning of a previous costar, but in celebration of it and says a lot. That she chose that specific part.

Again, you can’t tell me who to tag or who not to tag. Freya’s post has to do with separating herself from Geralt and also Henry’s Geralt. I’m also not “anti Henry Cavill”. That’s why I made this blog. To make open discussions and critiques.

You can’t tell me who to tag and who not to tag, hope this helps.

I agree, I don’t think anything inappropriate happened either between them from what I’ve seen. I will say from what I’ve seen gamers and gamers in fanbases talk about is that the Witcher and Warhammer fanbases can be a little toxic and misogynistic. A lot of women I think would be shocked by the way they can talk. Not the book fandoms of the Witcher but the gamer ones. I can’t really speak on someone’s sexuality, but I won’t shut the idea down either if it’s plausible. And yeah there’s something off and some cracks in his gentleman persona, for example his relationship and also having a baby with his partner before marriage or engagement (to be clear there is nothing wrong with that choice, but for that specific conservative gentleman persona it doesn’t fit) even continuing to continue whatever relationship they have after her controversies etc.

Not really sure what’s trying to be said here… but Henry not doing any interviews for season 3 is part of the problem and wasn’t because of what you’re saying. And also Freya’s post had a lot to do with Henry.

I know people think that the Henry Cavill being toxic on set claims were false... however... I can't help but think there was some (let me emphasize the word some) truth to it, or some sort of disagreements that could have happened. The anons are for Henry and Natalie relationship speculations/ comments, but feel free to leave any anons about any Witcher thoughts.

I hear you anon. There’s been a lot of noticeable gaps in their timeline or things that just don’t make sense, including the pr teams trying to push they met through “work” when they obviously didn’t. And there’s been a lot of lies from both sides.

You didn’t misunderstand, which is why I showed the first article. I don’t think you’re a stan, and appreciate being on the same page about wanting truth and not baseless gossip for a blog. The second attached is Closer, as you mentioned, which is connected to Us Weekly, a popular magazine that puts out exclusives a lot. I wouldn’t show any articles on here if they were AI generated or were fake. So let me break down how these articles work. If you read the article you’d see it says “source close to Henry”. When it comes to exclusive articles like these, you can’t make up “hey I know so and so”. Because that would lead to a lawsuit defamation on behalf of Henry and Natalie etc, it would be a scandal. Magazines can have gossip, but when it has sources it’s valid. Mind you when it comes to these articles, it costs money to put them out. A big amount. So a random fan wouldn’t be able to push an exclusive article. Key word here is EXCLUSIVE, which means it’s legit. The source was also speaking in favor of Natalie, if you notice, saying she’s been “patient” and so on and so forth. If the article only said “fans say Natalie has been incredibly patient with him but like everybody who knows Henry back in Hollywood, she's waiting for him to formalize things with a proposal and a wedding date," then I wouldn’t be posting the article. But it said “Natalie has been incredibly patient with him but like everybody who knows Henry back in Hollywood, she's waiting for him to formalize things with a proposal and a wedding date, reveals a longtime pal of the action star”. So now that I’ve explained that, both articles are indeed true, which makes the situation look even weirder. If you’re in a happy and healthy relationship, you don’t try to use public magazines to push for a ring. Here’s the link to the Closer Weekly article. https://www.closerweekly.com/posts/henry-cavill-under-pressure-to-propose-to-gf-natalie-viscuso/

Agree with all of this. Aside from an Instagram account or two and its followers, the “brides” are creepy, very creepy, but few and far in between compared to his gamer fanbase and the rest of his fandom. And the stans get confused with “haters” vs legitimate criticism. But attack anyone who would even say Natalie had a stray hair in her picture. And if it was a problem and he wanted total secrecy, we’d see no paid pap walks during her pregnancy. There wouldn’t have been a grand reveal with her shoulder shrug and smirk on his press tour. We’d see no pap walks in Italy or Spain while they’re with the baby. We’d see none of that. So the “haters” aren’t why they haven’t posted in a normal way, or acted the way they have as a whole regarding the situation.