Sit with me!

P1. Magnus the Red

(+ tomorrow's pony is Fulgrim :3)

Casual out-of-armor sketches ( ˙꒳​˙ )

Imagine: You're the pinnacle of your species, elevated above all others, able to comprehend and apply forces that could tear another's soul apart. Your warriors spontaneously exploding into writhing goo sounds catastrophic on paper, but at the end of the day, it's just a metaphysical medical issue. Not terrible, considering what other legions have to deal with, right?

And yet, no matter what you try to fix it, nothing works. The problem persists and you start getting desperate, frustrated. You're supposed to have all the answers! You're the scholar, the mage, the keeper of the arcane. Peering under the veil of reality to commune with its tumultuous undercurrent is just Tuesday for you. How does such a simple little puzzle like this continue to stump you?

From what I've read, Magnus seems to work best whenever he's paired with someone more grounded. Not just to keep him from skipping off down a new research rabbit hole every two minutes, but to support and stabilize in general.

Being a psyker in the Imperium is already a very isolating position: you're constantly regarded with suspicion, your primary worth lies in how your unique properties can be harnessed for the benefit of others. Magnus thinks he can't rely on anyone else to help him, both because he thinks no one else could understand and of the risk of attracting the wrong kind of attention and getting his legion censured permanently.

[spamtenna]

You can tell it's old cause' it's based in the Love sequence card and the the commercial)🥺 I'm just slow at drawin

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.