Endogenic versus traumagenic? When should you consider trauma?
We never want to encourage people who have no reason to believe they have trauma to go down wildly speculative roads in order to disprove a negative (ie: the absence of trauma). That said, we worry that the DID/OSDD-1 communities and the non-trauma multiple communities are so separate that many people might accept non-traumatized multiple identities without exploring possible warning signs of trauma. If this doesnât actually happen and itâs just our vain worry, then thatâs great. In case it happens, hereâs our post.
The most commonly accepted and most widely known explanation for multiplicity is that you (or perhaps others in your system) went through trauma. The concept of endogenic multiplicity is somewhat new in popular conception, and unfortunately psychology does not seem to have had a real look at it yet. Psychologyâs lack of awareness does not make endogenic multiplicity invalid, but it does suggest that we presently do not have any stable, set-in-stone criteria for distinguishing DID/OSDD-1 from endogenic multiplicity. This is especially true if you consider that some self-identified endogenic multiple systems have members who have been through trauma (but see the trauma as unrelated to their multiplicity), and some DID/OSDD-1 systems believe the true source of their multiplicity came before the trauma or is somehow separate from it.
There are some situations where people have thought through their conditions and concluded that they fit neatly into the traumagenic or endogenic category. While this opinion is controversial among DID/OSDD-1 people, we believe it is possible for multiplicity to exist without trauma. That said, we imagine the multiplicity would look quite different from DID or OSDD-1. Many people weâve met have experienced things that psychiatry does not quite account for, and they believe these experiences (and not physical or emotional trauma from this life and plane of existence) produced their multiplicity. Some say they co-incarnated with other spirits or are hosting walk-ins from other worlds. Others describe experiencing past-life trauma that split them on the level of the soul. Weâve also encountered people who believed that their multiplicity was a hard-wired neurodivergence rather than a developmental condition.
We donât have any particular problem with non-traumatized people saying theyâre multiple. However, we get worried when we see people claiming to be 100% trauma-free while showing symptoms and behaviors like:
Black-out level dissociation.
Difficulty communicating with alters that is significantly more intense than the struggle you had to get along with a fussy roommate in college.
Serious walls or barriers preventing fluid communication between system members.
Trigger responses to topics like sex, sexual abuse, genitals, members of a specific gender, certain relatives, child abuse, or other subjects that are commonly triggering to survivors of abuse.
System members who seem like they stopped growing/aging/developing at a certain point in the bodyâs life.
The presence of alters who deliberately emotionally, physically, or sexually harm other alters as if it is their job to stifle your progress and make your lives difficult.
Not every DID/OSDD-1 system will have these signs, but I sadly have seen many of these in certain endogenic systems Iâve encountered. If you are experiencing these things, the following are not conclusive proof that thereâs no trauma:
âBetween the five of us, none of us remember any abuse.â Basically the whole point of disorders like DID and OSDD-1 is concealing trauma. If you are sure there are exactly five people in your system and there is no one who suspects or remembers any trauma, then it might be reasonable to conclude that there isnât/wasnât any. However, there are a couple things to double-check for before you conclude that. First off, are you absolutely sure that you five are the only ones? If not, make sure you havenât been neglecting any dark/foreboding/unpleasant parts of the system where members may have different stories than the ones you five know. Second, are you sure that members of your system cannot disconnect from certain unpleasant emotions, memories, or experiences without fully switching? Sometimes individual alters will split or simply lose touch with memories, feelings, and emotions in response to trauma. This can leave five separate people who are each convinced there is no trauma even though they all went through trauma.
âSure, we were pretty unhappy as young kids, but nothing we experienced was âbad enoughâ to count as abuse.â A lot of systems who say this eventually reveal that they were seriously emotionally abused, that they were neglected as young children (but not sexually abused), that they experienced sexual abuse they consider âless seriousâ than experiences theyâve read about on survivor blogs, that their parents hit them in a ânormalâ way, or that they went through something else shocking and personally violating like terrifying and painful medical procedures as young children, losing loved ones at a young age, etc. ISST-D says that DID can come from physical, sexual, or other trauma inflicted in childhood. This leaves a wide range of possibility for what could âcountâ as âenoughâ trauma.
âOur parents were good people.â Having good parents does not guarantee that you were not traumatized. Were you ever alone with people (of any age) who were not your parents? It is also important to realize that many dissociative systems have members who idealize their parents and other caregivers after dissociating from trauma. Itâs not necessary to investigate your parents if you all feel there is no evidence that they physically, emotionally, or sexually abused you (and this includes times when it âwasnât that badâ or âwas normalâ or when they claimed it was somehow your fault). It is, however, a good idea to make sure that you are safe.
âMy therapist/dad/friend/cousin/psych professor/etc told me I seem normal.â This was one of our reasons for doubting there was early childhood trauma. Itâs pretty common for everyone to think theyâre an expert when it comes to other peopleâs trauma and health in general. However, even a therapist cannot know you better than you know yourself. If you are showing signs of trauma, it may be worth exploring those regardless of what this person thinks or thought.
We think itâs fully possible for multiplicity to be endogenic. However, we also know itâs possible for people to doubt or deny or even lose all awareness of their own trauma even while they are visibly switching or obviously getting triggered/otherwise being affected by trauma. Donât let others tell you who to be or what to believe about your past, but also donât discount the possibility of trauma if there are signs that itâs there.