i'm on mastodon now https://mastodon.social/@gupdoo3
EDIT: I'm now also on bluesky! https://bsky.app/profile/gupdoo3.bsky.social

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣


izzy's playlists!
almost home
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

oozey mess

Product Placement
NASA

#extradirty
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Cosimo Galluzzi
DEAR READER
dirt enthusiast
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
occasionally subtle
KIROKAZE

JBB: An Artblog!
Claire Keane
Sade Olutola

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela

seen from Türkiye
seen from Austria

seen from France

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from T1

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from Switzerland
seen from T1
@gupdoo3
i'm on mastodon now https://mastodon.social/@gupdoo3
EDIT: I'm now also on bluesky! https://bsky.app/profile/gupdoo3.bsky.social

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
oooh okay a human claiming an entire group of animals is useless. how novel.. and you think killing them all would do barely anything? that's so interesting! and you believe you're stating truth right? you're not a biologist either? damn... this... this may be a stroke of genius... you're so right... wow...
TWENTY MINUTES BABEY CAN WE HEAR IT FOR TWENTY MINUTES!!
Sick sick sick of possibility of being fucking recorded every waking second by tiktok obsessed quasi celebs. Video titled something like "Caught him thinking he's the main character" but it was just a kid wearing headphones, looking out the bus window. Of course it was posted without his knowledge. Stop recording strangers and everything you see, nobody gives a shit and not everyone is happy to be on tiktok or youtube because of a moron with no braincells and an account. What could be a forgettable awkward moment is now permanently there for the victim of lackabrainis infested idiot to get anxious about forever.
Okay, this seems like a relevant thing to share today: I've been in this position. Back in college while on that student lifestyle, I somehow ended up with a pretty bad iron deficiency. How bad? I was not only sleeping too much, I was falling asleep everywhere -- in class, in the library, in cafes five minutes after drinking coffee. It was terrible. Anyway, during a class I enjoyed, I was sat at a table with a few classmates, and I started falling asleep while taking notes; nodding off, dropping my pen, startling awake and falling asleep again, until my head was on the table. No one seemed to mind, we were all going through it I guess, and my lecturer was nice enough not to make a big deal out of it.
Cut to the next day and I was in the Students Union, when a friend came up to me and told me how funny that video was of me falling asleep in class was. What? I asked her about it, what did she mean, who made the video, and she realised I literally had no clue about it. Kindly, she told me who to talk to and I thanked her. I was already upset, but I knew it wasn't the messenger's fault. So, I took to Facebook and messaged the girl who made the video -- a girl on my table in the class from before. I asked her about it, and she admitted it right away -- she took the video on her phone during class and posted it to her snapchat. That's how the other girl saw it, not to mention countless others.
Sorting this out was an absolute toil. I felt betrayed and violated that someone would do that while I was obviously not in a position to have any say about it. I lost friendships with the people who took the girl's side, as if it was no big deal or "funny". I had to tell the lecturer about it, because let's face it, that's a shit thing to allow to happen during class itself, the department moved to be more alert and proactive about restricting phone use in class, and all that girl had to do was give a half-hearted apology. The next semester, she was still openly using her phone in another class we had.
For a long time, I couldn't trust anyone who held their phone up around me, as if to take photos or video. It would make me so anxious and put me on edge. I never did speak to the people who cosigned her behaviour, who acted like it wasn't their problem that their bff video-recorded a person in class over their health condition without their consent.
I did eventually grow out of my anxiety around phones, and I resisted the urge to break that girl's phone, but, I will absolutely bring back that energy if I see someone record a stranger in public without their consent. Take it from someone who's been that target -- if you think it's okay, you deserve to get your shit wrecked.
I just want to add, in case anyone reads this and isn't sure -- yes, it is absolutely fine to reblog this, and in fact I encourage you to. If testimony from a former target of this behaviour is the one thing that makes it click for anyone thinking of doing it, if it makes them reconsider before potentially ruining a stranger's life, then my experience will be worth it for me.
Don't record strangers and put that shit on the Internet or social media without their consent.
I will also throw out a reminder that some people may be essentially in hiding and wouldn't like their faces plastered online because they were looking over the produce section of the grocery store with a "weird" expression or whatever.
Victims of abuse and violence, people who've gone no contact with family, people (usually women) with abusive exes, special needs children, etc, etc. All people who could be easily found and hurt if these 'ha ha funny' videos end up in the wrong person's feed.
For the love of all things holy, please grow out of this need to try and 'go viral' from filming perfect strangers and adding a 'funny' little soundtrack.
This all comes back to the entitlement attitude. That girl mentioned above didn't video the other for fun. She recorded it because she found it funny and thought that she would get attention and likes or whatever by posting it to her social media.
If you do this, you are profiting off of someone else's image/struggles/life. That 'profit' may not be money, but it's clout, it's likes, it's reblogs, it's a whole buncha others joining in to make fun of this person who has no idea they've been recorded and are now the target of some joke.
It's cruel, it's childish, it's rude and hurtful. Stop thinking the entire world is your personal content fodder, and stop recording strangers for the lolz.
Grow the hell up.
what a beautiful day to not be in high school
This is the like those “remember to be grateful you don’t have a sore throat right now” posts. It IS a beautiful day to not be in high school! Thank you!
A fun bonus fact for you: those No Longer Buyable DVDs?
They're the ONLY surviving NONDAMAGED form of the show. In the late 90s, the masters from which the show is printed were damaged with a red-pink hazy filter.
So. Good luck buying them even if you find them. They're some of the most valuable collector's items in the entire franchise.
Without piracy, there would be NO UNDAMAGED COPIES OF SAILOR MOON AVAILABLE TO ANYONE ANYWHERE, PERIOD.
Piracy Is Preservation.
i have a suggestion

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
#i understand is for the sake of the format#but i am fascinated by the implications that the srawing consents to being drawn
this is actually intentional commentary on the state of art because anyone who has drawn enough pictures can tell you that whether or not the drawing is consenting to being drawn right now has a huge impact on whether or not you're able to do it.
so. i just learned that my entirely me-written resume flags as being AI-written by automated HR systems for a few writing quirks and the fact that i followed all the rules of good resume writing, which is apparently a telltale sign of AI use in this fucking hellworld. i've been desperately applying to jobs that i am massively overqualified for for months with no response, not even an interview, and now i find out that at least part of the reason is because some fucking moron decided that following the rules every career advisor has given me for a decade means i cheated and should be disqualified. the ai bubble cannot pop soon enough. what the actual fuck.
"frequent use of action-result sentences. bullet points all start with action verbs. no career gaps." girl what the fuck are you talking about. that's just resume writing advice being followed. i just did what i was told. it's a fucking resume. you're supposed to do all that stuff. what the fuck do you mean it looks ai generated and wouldn't pass basic detection systems?????????? for following the resume writing rules????????????
wishing every AI bro and ceo a very [REDACTED]
Hannah Montana is fucked up because its entire POINT as a show is that children should be protected from fame and exploitation, but it stars a REAL little girl that's being exploited. Nearly every episode carries the looming threat of Miley being outed as Hannah and losing her peaceful teenage life to the ravages of fame. Her father in the show (played by her own father in real life) wisely protected her from the trauma of fame by making her wear a disguise and live a rather quiet, interview-free life. Meanwhile the REAL Billy Ray Cyrus sold his daughter to Disney Channel when she was 11 and forced her to read dialogue about how terrible it would be to face the public eye. Like... Jesus, dude. The fictional Robby Ray is 10x the father, and it's not even close. (It's also IMMENSELY funny that her dad doesn't use his real name in the show, while she does. Almost like he wanted a bit of a disconnect between his identity and his character. Something Miley didn't get.)
Hyperrealistic simulacrum of a good father
there's a certain rhetorical sleight-of-hand i often see on this website wherein the phrase "media literate" is deployed but what's meant is more along the lines of "sharing a specific interpretation of a text." the skills that make up media literacy have to do with the ability to understand what's being said in the text and how that message is conveyed mechanically. two people can be equally media literate and will still interpret the message radically differently if, say, one is a card-carrying marxist and the other votes tory. and that's not me saying that both are equally 'correct,' because i don't think that lol. but you can't resolve that type of disagreement by 'teaching more media literacy' (often a euphemism for economically inaccessible and culturally hegemonic university education) if you're ignoring the political and social interpretive frameworks and value systems that people are importing when they put their media literacy skills to use
the corollary is that some interpretations of a text ARE reactionary, but often that's not due to 'media illiteracy' and in fact, the assumption that the university functions as some kind of enlightening force is itself ALSO reactionary and doesn't engage with the political conflicts that are actually at hand

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
theres definitely a line of thought ive noticed in liberal circles and in media and stuff where they think that bad stuff works and is true but is just bad for some moral reason.
but the thing is that this stuff is just factually wrong. eugenics doesnt work. race science isnt true. theyre morally wrong, yes, but theyre also factually incorrect, ideas that are deployed in service of monstrous ideology despite the fact that they simply arent true.
and its a major impediment to effectively combating these ideas, because if you concede their premises, you have already given ground to your enemies.
sometimes being a fan of something means not wanting them to make any more of it
Hey I hope this goes without saying, especially now that Affirmative Action is being killed off, but stop filling out the "optional" self identifiers on job applications. Either leave it blank if you can or if you can't put decline to self identify. ESPECIALLY of they ask your sexual orientation.
The state of TTRPGs if it was video games
“Oh I wanna play a Half-life video game; instead of playing Half-life 1, Blue Shift, Opposing Force, Half-life 2, Episode 1, Episode 2, Portal, Portal 2, E:0, or E:02, I’ll just download 10,000 mods for Skyrim until all the draugr are replaced with Combine soldiers.”
dude they have this thing called a rulebook
I watched so many lets plays. None of them installed mario on my computer.
so here we are
The state of TTRPGs if it was video games:
*tries to enforce rulebook*
*gets thoroughly ignored*
*everyone is still having fun with their bullshit while the guy with the rulebook is sitting alone in the corner*
Yeah turns out people don’t like to be told how to play to the point that they will literally develop hacking skills to be able to do whatever random crap they find funny. Which isn’t always the wisest choice, but it’s the one they found fun. Maybe TTRPGs would be more popular if the modding community was more welcome, which, wait, that’s what lead to the 2010s boom of D&D until Wizards decided to start messing with the rules and suddenly everyone stopped caring again. It’s almost like rule lawyering is what puts people off games, huh. D&D didn’t get it’s rebirth as a game, but as a game engine, during the era when Minecraft and Roblox were succeeding by doing the same thing.
Maybe that’s what Tabletop has to learn from Vidya.
You don’t know what “rules lawyering” means, or really what anything you’re saying means, but mostly that one.
You’re looking at the concept of playing by the rules and seeing it as blind obedience instead of literacy.
“D&D had its rebirth as a game engine” is just falling hook, line and sinker for WotC’s marketing. It’s also patently untrue
Even in the game engine metaphor it’s still like trying to make Tetris, Stardew Valley, Total War: Warhammer, the Stanley Parable, Ultima Online, Bass Pro Fishing 2026, whatever you want in Bethesda’s Creation Engine as if you don’t need to put a hat on a guy to have something pretending to be a train. In the manner that any given system is a kind of interpretive analog computer, each one fills the same role as a game engine. But similar you’re not going to want to make a physics puzzle game in the engine that still has identical weird physics bugs to the ones which happened in a game engine that the creators claim to have not upgraded from but entirely stopped using. It’s still tying a glowstick to a hammer and saying it makes for a great flashlight because Home Depot says its valid to do what you want with the things you bought.
"Water type is super effective against Fire type"
"omg stop rules lawyering"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Stage play redraws ☺️🫶
Hey everyone. There's a new youtube feature that rolled out just yesterday that's raising some privacy concerns.
People in the U.S., U.K., Brazil, and Singapore can now share videos and chat with friends directly within the YouTube app. The update bring
This post talks about a new DM feature in youtube. What it fails to mention is that as part of this new feature is that when you send someone a link to a video, and they open it in the youtube app, they will see who sent them the link. Specifically, your channel name.
If your google account name is your real name, so is your channel name by default.
This means the new default behavior is that everyone you send a youtube link to will see your full name if they open it in the mobile app.
To turn this off:
Go to your youtube app settings
Go to Privacy
Turn off "Channel visibility for shared links"
Trimming the source id (the stuff after the '?' in links) will also prevent this from happening.