In the wake of GO3 I've seen a lot of talk about how NG very likely measures the value of his writing with how strong emotions he manages to rouse from his audience, and he doesn't actually care what exact emotions they are. I agree with this view, but that's a topic for a whole other post (which I probably won't make, sorry).
What matters here is that the broadly understood showbusiness kind of looks at things that way too. On the one hand, powers that be prefer to avoid too much controversy. But on the other, things that caused strong reactions are worth keeping in mind for them.
Which means that we have helped NG stay on the map by very emotionally discussing the finale.
I am not saying we shouldn't have, or judging anybody. I have joined the discussion myself, engaging with the topic for the first time since the allegations came to light. Discussing problematic media and media by problematic creators is a proper paradox you cannot solve - because it's bad if you do and it's bad if you don't (a topic for another post, oh dear...)
What I'm saying is, we cannot make it easier for him to wiggle his way back in.
HE. CANNOT. WIGGLE. HIS. WAY. BACK. IN.
Here are a few simple things I think we can do:
Regarding Good Omens - we do not ask for original S3 scripts to be released!!!
Please, I am begging you all! This is important!
I know a lot of people have a lot of reasons to want to know what the S3 would be like if it had full six episodes. But it genuinely terrifies me when I see voices - and I do see them! - that Amazon should release original scripts.
Do not open that door for him!
Firstly, do you really think a serial rapist has something to say about love and humanity that is worth your time? Secondly, even if he had, he doesn't deserve a chance to make ANY money from it.
In general - just keep talking about it! Don't let it be buried and forgotten!
There are two things that really weight on my heart here, so I am going to use this opportunity to let it out.
First: please, for the love of God, cut the crap about "respecting Gaiman's real victims"!
I know it sounds like a beautiful and noble sentiment, but from what I've seen in the last two years this line is almost exclusively used to silence someone up. I know most people aren't doing it on purpose, they just genuinely find it distasteful how people speak about the whole thing, and in many cases I agree.
But the truth is, the most disrespectful thing is to not talk about it at all.
You feel that people who write detailed analysis of why GO3 was an emotional abuse are out of touch with reality and disrespectful towards women Gaiman physically abused? It doesn't matter. They address the fact that Gaiman is an abuser and that matters. Whether you like it or not, they keep the conversation going. So don't use Gaiman's victims as a tool to shut that conversation down just because it offends your sensibilities.
You feel that people complaining their show had a bad ending or was cancelled have their priorities wrong and have no respect for Gaiman's real victims? It doesn't matter. It still spreads the word. Does it really matter to you if someone who didn't know what Gaiman did will learn about it from someone bitching about how they are sad about their show or from a beautiful essay about the victims?
Which brings me to the second thing:
Remember that modern internet is very good at keeping up walls between people with different interests and keeping people inside their bubbles. The most important thing is not to find the smartest and the most eloquent argument while preaching to the choir, but to reach people outside our bubble!
You will probably do much more good by dropping the info casually in a place where it might not come up otherwise, then discussing it where it is already discussed.
I am not saying you to go and shout about NG under a curry recipe or sewing tutorial, but, you know, when you have an opportunity to bring him up in space where it makes sense to bring him up, do it!
I didn't expect to write so much...