𝔨𝔶𝔬𝔨𝔞 𝔰𝔲𝔦𝔤𝔢𝔱𝔰𝔲

This blog exists as an archive of thought. You are free to draw upon the author’s words as sustenance for your own ideas and reflections. What is expressed here is a product of my consciousness, and thus I offer it without reserve. Interpretation becomes inheritance: to read is to alter.

The inbox is open. I am glad to receive your questions, ideas, and reflections.

Hashtags:

#ksAnalysis - long, full-fledged analyses and analytical articles.

#ksInbox - questions and partial questions from the inbox; materials inspired by readers' messages.

#ksFragments - brief reflections and mini-analyses, echoes of the main ideas.

#ksNotes - personal notes, jottings, observations by the author that do not develop into full articles.‏

⚔︎ MASTERLIST ⚔︎

Moriarty the Patriot:

William analysis

My thoughts

My mtp opinions

My mtp opinions p2

Modern!AU William

William's perfect partner

Louis and William

William’s political mindset

Modern!AU Liam&Louis

William's narcolepsy

Modern!AU MTP hobbies

William's approach

Albert's phrase

Flaws in mtp

Liam in love headcanon

William and Albert

this is a fairly subjective interpretation on my part, but I have previously conducted several analyses of religious references in manga, so I have now decided to approach this one specifically through philosophy

Some philosophers, such as Bruno Bauer, once believed that criticism must be directed primarily at religion. In their view, liberation from religion equates to liberation of society. In Ludwig Feuerbach's work, the critique becomes more developed: God is merely a projection of human essence. People unconsciously attribute their own qualities to God and then begin to worship this projection. However, philosophers as Karl Marx, who initially shared this view, later stated that criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism. For him, religion is only an expression of human suffering, and therefore one must examine the social conditions that produce this suffering. The full quotation reads as follows: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." The logic here is that if suffering and exploitation were to disappear entirely, the need to seek consolation in religion would also disappear. From this follows my interpretation of the religious references, in which Albert gradually begins to see less and less of William in religious terms. William becomes a form of salvation at the level of Albert’s internal motivation, where a clear parallel can be observed. His worldview changes not because someone convinces him of the falsity of religion, but because he begins to believe in the possibility of transforming the world itself, which previously seemed unchangeable. For Albert, religion initially functions as a response to experienced alienation and injustice. However, once the possibility of acting to change the social order emerges, the need for religion as the primary form of reconciliation with reality diminishes. What changes is not belief itself, but rather Albert's relationship to his own capacity to transform the world.

So this book is deriving the orbit from observations by assuming the body follows a Keplerian conic, which is, essentially, Newtonian celestial mechanics, and since Euler is determining the orbit based on the given observations, Moriarty would’ve analysed the full dynamical behaviour of a small body under perturbations.