Luke

we’re really gonna sit here and act like logos, annoyingly pervasive as they are but still appealing to some aesthetic sensibility and adhereing to principles of tasteful design, are in any way compaarble to nigscrawl thrown up anywhere on the street, often over other visual media and on other people’s property without their permission, and have historically indicated the presence–if not still indicating the presence–of gangs? am I getting this right? people don’t reject nigscrawl because they want to consume product, they reject it because it’s an indicator of squalor.

People now have ZERO deniability on the topic of migration being invasion. Not that there ever was much room to deny it but at this point it should be seen as a conscious and malicious act.

60,001 that should be shot. At minimum.