I've been car-free for nearly four years, now. This RadMission ebike has been my primary transportation for the past three years, now.

if i look back, i am lost

JBB: An Artblog!
Misplaced Lens Cap

â
Sade Olutola

Product Placement
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi
we're not kids anymore.
cherry valley forever
i don't do bad sauce passes
ojovivo
Jules of Nature

blake kathryn
Not today Justin
Stranger Things
seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from Belgium
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@gcvsa
I've been car-free for nearly four years, now. This RadMission ebike has been my primary transportation for the past three years, now.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I haven't been hanging around here for a really long time, but last year, I went to visit my mother in California. She moved out there a couple of years ago. While I was there, I found the Brother P-Touch labeller I left behind at her house in New Jersey back in 2012, when I moved to the West Coast. It turns out that I can download the Japanese P-Touch software and print in Japanese to my ancient PT-2300, instead of spending a bazillion dollars on a new PT-610BT and having it shipped from Japan. I made myself some new spice bottles for my portable lunch kit.
May 31 2016 - Collin Kennedy, who is a cancer patient, used expanding spray foam to disable a parking meter at the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg where he gets his treatment. He says the fees are a tax on the sick. [video]
yes!!!!!!!!
Lots of well-intentioned (I hope) but extremely condescending comments in the notes like âmaybe donât film yourself doing crime.â Respectfully⌠This man knew what he was doing. He didnât just film himself, he invited media to film him. He did this to make his own statement, with his own voice, with his own face. He wanted himself and his actions to be visible.
Collin Kennedy died in 2018, just two years after this video was taken. What would anonymity have achieved for him in those last two years? Avoiding punishment? His whole point was that these parking fees are already a punishment on the sick.
Is public protest dangerous? Sure. Is it more dangerous than merely existing as a sick or disabled person navigating a hostile healthcare system? I think that is for every individual experiencing it to decide for themselves.
A Winnipeg man who filled a city parking meter with spray foam to protest the high cost of parking for sick people around hospitals has died
Collin Kennedy, 50, lived with multiple myeloma â a type of blood cancer â for 19 years.
He invited media to watch him fill a parking meter with spray foam to raise awareness about the high costs of parking for cancer patients and other sick people getting treatment. Video of Kennedy vandalizing the meter was widely shared on social media. It led to a Canada-wide petition to end the practice of charging for parking near hospitals.
He was a man who fought the only way he knew how, even if that meant taking matters into his own hands and disabling parking meters. He wasnât in the boardrooms or corridors of power, he was on the streets trying to make a difference. (CBC News, December 12, 2018)
⌠over the course of his treatment, Kennedy spent over $17,000 on parking fees outside of hospitals.
$17,000.
$17,000
$17,000 !!!!!
yeah i think he makes a good point here
No matter how suspicious you might find the neighbor who never opens their blinds, they will never be as suspicious as the neighbor who wants free reign to peek in through peopleâs windows.
I spent ten years building up a following on Tumblr. I had 30k+ followers, great engagement, it helped my career thrive like nothing else. I could quit my day job and live off the fan base Iâd accrued.
Then, their policies changed. Half my work was no longer allowed. People left the site in droves. I left too, for awhile. I came back to a ghost town. I still have 25k followers, but I donât think more than 10% are active anymore. Iâm followed by ghosts. Same with DeviantArt, although I was never quite as big there, and Iâve been gone so much longer.
This disallowed half of my work was never allowed on Facebook in the first place, or Instagram, but their algorithms are such that my stuff rarely makes it to anyoneâs feeds, and if I post a link to where people could actually pay me for my content, itâs hidden unless I pay for it. Patreon swept my work away to a dark corner where no one could see it unless I personally guided them there. Twitch is so strict you canât even show bare feet. The death of Google Reader means nobody follows RSS feeds anymore, so I canât direct people to my own site.
So thereâs Twitter I guess, where I can post whatever I want, but again, algorithms. But more than that, I donât have the energy to build up a following once again on a site I donât own that can delete my career on a whim. The thought of spending time jumping around through hoops for attention just to have it taken away again has stripped any motivation I had to try.
The internet has been gentrified. All the small cute houses and mom & pop shops have been shut down and replaced by big corporations that control everything. Iâve been making webcomics for twenty years, and at the start, the internet was a beautiful wild place. Everyone had a home page. It was like having a house and people came to visit you and you would visit other people in their houses. Now, we donât visit each other in personal spaces anymore. Itâs like we have to visit each other in the aisles of a megamart. Everything is clean and sanitized and the weirdos who made the internet what it was are no longer welcome. No space for freaks anymore.
People still ask me for advice on how to break into comics, and I donât have any wisdom because I donât recognize the internet anymore. I donât feel comfortable working within its boundaries which seems to be getting smaller and smaller and smaller. None of the tools I used when I started exist anymore. Theyâve been replaced by things I donât know how to use. I donât think I could break into comics today. 2002 had so few barriers compared to now. You might have started on Keenspace, but you could reach a point where you could break away to your own site and people would go to it. Now, you start on Webtoon or Patreon and I guess you just stay there? It feels so much like owning a hardware store for years and then having to go work as a cashier at the Home Depot that put you out of business. Iâm looking at my career trajectory and it all points to being a Wal-Mart greeter with uncontrolled arthritis.
I donât want to make âcontent,â I want to make comics, I want to make art, and I want to do it in a space that is mine. Iâm not sure thereâs a place for that anymore.
As Twitter empties out, I am once again a digital nomad, trying to rebuild a following on yet another site I donât own (Bluesky, which is nice and you should follow me but also I am just so tired.) Every single time I move to a new site, maybe only 10% of old followers keep following me to the new place. Having done this several times, I barely have anything anymore.
YU+ME, at its peak in 2007, had 250,000 regular readers that came to my own personal website. Today, I have 450 followers on Bluesky. To say that I feel absolute existential despair is an understatement. I am making the best work of my life and nobody is seeing it.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Exploring by hermez
a train ,Shinbashi
I want to live in a place where advertisements for the new PasuâPare and Afterglow split single are totally normal sights on the subway.
Vintage Vox AC50 Bias Requirements (A Bit of a Rant)
Somewhere around 2002 I was doing some work with Bob Dylan and his band in preparation for a tour. They bought a THD BiValve-30 head and a pair of our 2x12 speaker cabinets for Bob to use as his stage rig. I helped the band out in rehearsals with a few technical things and, in the process became friends with their two main techs, Tom Morrongiello and Yuek Wong, both great road techs and wonderful people.
At one point in this process, while they were on tour, Yuek phone me, asking how to properly bias a 1960s Vox AC50 that Charlie Sexton had on tour. I told him that, even though the schematic recommended 47mA per tube, it was happiest at 25ma. (Thereâs that number again.) Yuek responded that my advice was dramatically different from what he was being told by all the other techs he had spoken to. I recommended that he simply try my numbers and let his ears make the decision. Instead he decided to call every tech he knew. He called Ken Fischer, Blackie Pagano, Tom Mitchell, Harry Kolbe, Aspen Pittman (not an amp tech, but a tube expert), Gerald Weber, Mark Sampson, and a host of other techs in the US and Europe. All of them told him that it was a class-A amp, and needed to be biased to numbers as low as 120mA per tube to as high as 175mA per tube, depending upon who he asked. This is the range where he was biasing it (because the majority must be correct, no?), and still the amp sounded awful. His conclusion was that the amp must be broken in some way.
Again, Yuek called me, and asked how my opinion on biasing the AC50 could be so different from everyone elseâs. My answer was not subtle: First, itâs not an opinion, itâs a fact. Second, for a few years, one of my main amps was an early 1966 AC50, and I loved it! (I only sold it because someone offered me a ridiculous amount of cash for it.) Third, the AC50 is not, and never was, a class-A amplifier; it is a class-AB amplifier. I said, âI know how bad and arrogant this sounds, but I am right and they wrong.âÂ
I reminded him that a pair of EL34 power tubes in class-A will only put out about 30 watts max, and only if they are using a huge power supply and enormous output transformer designed for class-A operation. (A 50-watt class-A output transformer will be about the size of a 150-watt class-AB output transformer.)
The AC50 is called an AC50 because it is designed to put out 50 watts RMS. I said: âIf you bias it as they are recommending, it will have no highs, the bass will be tubby and weak, and it will put out about 10 watts maximum, and a bad-sounding 10 watts at that.â He agreed that it sounded exactly the way I was describing. I was finally getting through to him.
Again, I advised him to bias it to 25mA per tube and give it a listen. He admitted that the amp would not even go that low with its current bias supply, and he didnât know how to rebuild the supply to give that range. As they were in LA, and as round-trip airfares from Seattle to LA were $99 at the time, I offered to fly down and sort it out for them. I added that if I was wrong, then the amp needed to be repaired, because something else was wrong with it, and I would repair it for free and pay for my own flight. But, if I was right, I would like them to pay for my flight and my work. Yuek agreed.
Two days later, I arrived at the venue and, without even listening to the amp (because running it at that bias is very bad for the transformers, the filter caps and the tubes), I performed a basic voltage test on the amp, warmed up my soldering iron, rebuilt the bias supply and biased it for 25mA per tube. When I was done, I plugged in to it and played a bit. The amp sounded glorious. It was loud and clear, tight, detailed, and with the touch-sensitive midrange punch that I always loved about the AC50 when hit hard. Yuek was at the same time thrilled and in disbelief. How could so many famous techs be so completely wrong?
A few minutes later Charlie Sexton came onto the stage and Yuek had him try the amp. Charlie lit up like a Christmas tree with joy at how fantastic it sounded how rewarding and responsive it felt to play. He thanked Yuek profusely and asked what he had done to bring it to life. Yuek, being a gentleman, said âThank Andy, not me. All I did was let him bias it his way.â I got a huge smile and hearty thanks from Charlie (another gentleman), and all was well. I turned down their offer to pay my airfare and work.
The crew was apologetic that there was no ticket to offer me, as the show was completely sold out, but they did give me a stage pass for the night. Again, they apologized that there would not be much room at the stage sides either. As it was Los Angeles, the number of friends of the band attending would be huge, but I was assured that I would at least have room to stand, and perhaps to sit.
As fate would have it, I watched the show from stage left, seated on a huge flight case, squeezed between Kate Hudson on my right and Johnny Depp on my left. At first, I thought I might chat with them. I knew Kateâs then husband Chris Robinson from my time with the Black Crowes, when I helped them get their gear in order while rehearsing for the âThree Snakes and One Charmâ tour. My conversation starter with Johnny would have been his friendship with my brother Gray (a visual effects supervisor), who had worked with him on a few of his films. In the end, I decided that conversing with them would only have boosted my ego, and would have likely been awkward and annoying to them, so I demurred and sat in silence. It was a good evening.
If there is a moral here, it is that the truth is the truth, regardless of who says otherwise, regardless of how loudly they shout it and how many of them are preaching it. If you are right, stick to your story and donât be bullied by anyone or any group of people. Iâm not trying to say that I am always right, but I make sure that I am before I stick my neck out.
A customer, who owns a THD Flexi-50, recently asked me why our recommended bias is so much lower than the âcommonly accepted 70% of maximum dissipation.â
The following is my rather verbose response:
Letâs start out by stating that I am a proper amplifier designer, not a hobbyist who cuts and pastes from other designs, and gleefully repeats whatever he reads on the internet, as if it were fact. Iâve been at this for 50 years and have consulted for everyone under the sun in terms of sound, reliability, manufacturability, and just about every aspect of analog audio circuit design you can think of. I do amp repairs and restorations for dozens of multi-platinum rock bands, and Iâve often gotten that work because they see that the only amps they have that almost never need repair are their THDs. Iâve also helped Philips, Fluke and Hewlett-Packard design and build better test equipment based on my experience. I donât even take proper textbooks as gospel, preferring to actually measure and analyze real-world situations, often proving PhD engineers and university department heads wrong in their assumptions.
Whoever started the myth that standard push-pull class AB1 guitar amplifiers (eg. Fender, Marshall, HiWatt, etcâŚ) should be biased to 70% of maximum allowable tube dissipation should have sugar put in their gas tank. This is totally wrong in every way. There is no magic percentage of maximum dissipation to which one should bias, but most class AB1 audio amplifiers are happiest in the 35% to 40% range. (For the record, 70% is what is generally recommended for portable class B2 radio transmitters, and is close to what a class A1 amp wants.) It all depends upon the impedance of the output transformer primary, the load line of the output transformer, the impedance of the screen supply, and a few other, more esoteric factors that arenât really worth getting into here.
People tend to repeat something that they read somewhere, as if it were truth, and it gets repeated and repeated until 95% of the hits on the internet are recommending something that was wrong to begin with. At times I find it frustrating.
That 70% factor also goes out the window when dealing with current production tubes, which are not designed to proper specs, but rather are made by reverse-engineering well-made old tubes and making countless assumptions as to why things were done the way they were. For instance, few of the Russian power tubes in production will work in a class-A amplifier. They tested their âdesignsâ in Marshall 50-watt heads. If they worked for a few hundred hours, they gave the go-ahead to production to make 100,000 of them. Everyone who really understood how to design power tubes has been dead for 40 years, and their expertise died with them. Most people donât spend their hard-earned money on NOS tubes because they sound better (some do, some donât), they usually buy NOS tubes because they will sound good for 10 years of daily use as opposed to 1 year of daily use with current production stuff.
The purpose of biasing a class AB1 push-pull amplifier is to eliminate crossover distortion in the signal, plain and simple. This can be done with a distortion analyzer, but it does not differentiate crossover distortion from other types of distortion, so an oscilloscope is the best way of determining when crossover distortion has gone. When a tube is biased too cold, the signal from one tube (or tubes on one side) stops flowing before the signal from the other tube (or tubes on the other side) starts flowing, and this âgapâ is called crossover distortion, as it occurs around the zero-crossing of the signal voltage. You bias a push-pull audio output section by first making it too cold on purpose, applying signal that is well below clipping, usually around 25% to 50% of clipping, and slowly increase the bias current (making the bias voltage less negative) until the gap at zero crossing is gone. When you have reached this point, you have attained the maximum dynamic range possible from the amplifier without the (very ugly-sounding) crossover distortion.
I got curious about where this point fell, as it could be a little bit ambiguous exactly where the crossover distortion âdisappearedâ, so I started writing down the no-signal (quiescent) dc current in the tubes where I was sure that it was gone. I documented this in roughly 10,000 amplifiers between 1969 and 1999. What I found was that, in high-powered class-AB1 amplifiers with properly designed output stages that ran their tubes near their voltage limits and had relatively linear load lines in the output transformers, the crossover distortion was sometimes gone by the time the bias was set to 21ma quiescent current per tube, often gone by 23ma, and always gone by 25ma quiescent current per tube.
One surprising thing is that it didnât seem to matter at all what the tube type was. This number held true for 6L6, EL34, 6550, KT66, KT77, KT88, KT90, 7027A, 6CA7, 7591, 7868, USA, German, Dutch, British, French, it just didnât seem to matter what the tube was, or who made it, as long as it was in this family of tubes that could deliver roughly 50 watts from a pair.
So, in order to make life easier for my techs, and to take some of the âguessworkâ out of the biasing process, I determined that with all Marshall and HiWatt 50-watt and 100-watt amps, Fender 40, 50, 80 and 100-watt amps, and similar circuits, that they were to measure cathode current with no signal, and set the bias so that the tubes drew 25ma per tube with no signal. Then they had to do a listening test, to make sure that all was indeed well. On a few occasions the amps sounded bad at that rating, and when that happened, I took over to try to figure out why. Sometimes the two tubes were not matched, sometimes the output transformer was damaged on one side, sometimes the output transformer had been replaced with one that was not correct for the amplifier, sometimes the screen supply had too little or too much impedance. But, when things were as they should be, 25ma always gave a clean signal with no crossover distortion.
So, if your amplifier has maximum dynamic range at 25ma quiescent current per tube, what happens if you run it hotter, like 30ma or 40ma? Good question. First off, the noise floor comes up and, the tubes run physically hotter, which reduces tube life, the power and output transformers run hotter (due to the extra current running through them, even with no signal), increasing resistance in the windings, reducing overall output levels, and shortening the life of the transformers. As you can likely guess, the filter caps donât last as long, either. I do know a few people who claim to prefer the sound of an amp biased to 40ma per tube, but these people almost always run full out, maximum distortion, 100% of the time, and never ride that expressive slope where clean gives way to âfatâ, âfatâ gives way to âcrunchâ, and âcrunchâ gives way to overdrive.
Another side of this is that the power supply and output stage can only deliver so much power before they just canât deliver any more, and this is the maximum distorted full output. If you bias the output stage hotter than it needs to be, you are reducing the ratio of clean output to maximum overdrive output, and robbing the amplifier of dynamic range. Think of it like the idle in your car engine. If your engine redlines at 8000 RPM and will idle smoothly at 400 RPM, you have a ratio of 20 to 1 in terms of âdynamic rangeâ when it comes to acceleration and general driving characteristics. You always want your idle as low as you can get it and still have it running smoothly. You can set the idle at 2000 RPM, but you will only have a dynamic range of 4 to 1, and will be shifting gears a LOT more often to get to speed. Also, youâll be burning a lot more fuel and fixing your car a lot more often.
Biasing your amplifier to 70% of maximum plate dissipation is like setting your carâs idle to 5600 RPM with a redline of 8000 RPM. Youâll be rebuilding your engine (or replacing power tubes, filter caps and transformers) a lot more often.
I have a lot of customers who have amps worked on (under warranty) by other companies (as I only do warranty work on THD amplifiers), and then bring them to me for biasing, as everyone else seems to bias them too hot, and then their tubes donât last very long, their amps sound overly compressed and âmushyâ, and they hum too much.
It is perfectly safe for your Flexi-50 if you want to try running your bias a little bit hotter. I would not recommend going above 40ma per tube, though.
Like on Tumblr to enter too! Reblogs will not count as entries so feel free to reblog if you own Sightwitch to spread the word to your followers.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
There's a reason why, in the 1990s, I found WoD games unpalatable, and that whenever I found myself talking about them, I would be sure to note that my character, if I had one, would absolutely be a Hunter/Slayer. Vampires are for staking, nothing more.
For the record, please remember that I was one of the founding staff of d8 magazine, the industry-changing RPG culture magazine of the mid-1990s, and can reasonably be considered to have some minor credentials as a gaming journalist the likes of which Gamergate types prefer to harass.
Setting aside the fact that the fantasy genre overall, and fantasy RPGs specifically, are largely predicated upon a level of racism that ought to disgust any liberty-minded, or even just diversity-minded, person, the glorification of the vampire and the werewolf is literally the glorification of murderers who would by any measure be described as psychopathic, if they were not, in actual fact, *inhuman*.
' On the surface level, vampires appeal to people by means not only of their mysticism, but their potency. They are ever-living, they can lift trucks with one hand, they can command the minds of lesser beings (which, for a vampire, is everybody), they are highly sexual, they are everything that you want to be. The ultimate wish fulfillment fantasy. And they donât have to truly work at it in order to accomplish those traits. Their strength and virility comes naturally to them, because they are born (or, to be exact, re-born) with it. Itâs in their blood.
For that reason, hereditary station is important to vampires. Their blood is what gives them strength, and with it, the right to feed on others. Because a vampire is a superior form of life, their race (by means of their blood) gives them an almost divine right to feed on lowly mortals â to thin the herd, if you will.
I started this article in the hopes of exposing the means by white the new White Wolf company has consistently and with measurable intent strove to find a nice market for their game.
They have aimed for the same market today as they did in the early 90s when their games were first produced â disenfranchised young white men, people who believe themselves to be of an above-average level of intelligence, outsiders and people with strong views counter to contemporary culture. In the 90s, these were goths, punks and others, like I was at the time. Today, itâs the alt-right, itâs neo-nazis, incels and MGTOWs. '
Vampires are evil on an entirely different spectrum than humans. Theyâre immortal predators. Human concerns about race are juvenile pubescent trivialities to them because humans are simply FOOD. They view us the same way we view cattle. Do you care about the colour of the fur on the cow that became your sunday roast?
The idea of being âmonstrousâ for a vampire isnât being a neo-nazi skinhead. Itâs looking at images of battery farms. Picture city blocks of people being forced into warehouses, their legs broken so that they canât run, strung up in cages to hang by their feet with taps jammed in their necks. Thatâs what is monstrous and evil about vampires â that they donât care. That their humanity is fucking dead and gone. And we know thatâs the level of alien monstrousness that is standard in the setting because that exact image has been used in the game before.
In the Gehenna novel, when the end of the world comes around and thereâs no higher power to answer to and nothing to stop them, thatâs exactly what vampires fucking do â round people up and chuck them in feeding warehouses like domestic cattle. That is terrifying. Being a neo-nazi isnât terrifying, itâs just shitty. If you were a vampire, being a neo-nazi would be a trifling, puerile, childish and juvenile concern â a concern that, quite literally, is of another species. '
http://dogwithdice.com/whitewolfaredead/
Redefining Individualism
For our final class activity for CT25, we were asked to do a photo shoot of us wearing traditional Filipino garments (from Spanish colonial period, to the Japanese and American occupation, to the modern age). My group mates Gelo, Pau, Kaira and I were tasked to wear Filipiniana in the New Society. Initially, there was this âruleâ that âboysâ were supposed to wear strictly menâs clothing (i.e. Barong Tagalog, camisa de chino). OkaaayyyyyyâŚâŚ :/ Luckily, since we got âNew Societyâ, it meant that we could interpret Filipiniana in whatever way we wanted since these are the modern times. Yay! :)
Our group chose to wear the Barong Tagalog, paired with black bottoms and fierce footwear. We opted to have a black and nude collection. We complemented our looks with gold, brass and silver accessories, to keep things looking modern and stylish yet elegant. In my case, I wore my Barong with black opaque leggings, wedge booties and brass accessories. :)
Actually, Iâm planning to write a magazine article about Filipiniana in the modern age. Though, it would be better if I do a bit of research first, right? Haha. So, for now. here is the original writeup. :)
NEW SOCIETY/MODERN AGE
The traditional Filipino costume (Barong, Filipiniana) saw a revival in 2000âs. Though considered as a formal dress code on most occasions, the Barong and the Filipiniana had turned into a more fashionable and relevant clothing to the new generation. Influenced by any other culture not just from the West, but also from different parts of the world, the designs now are more varied, customized, and creative. Designers have more freedom, tweaking small details in the traditional garments. The youth have come to appreciate it by injecting their own flair of style. As the global community becomes more open, new creative ideas and freedom on expression becomes more and more evident on the âNEWâ Barong and Filipiniana, contesting the conventional, re-defining individualism. Women are not just boxed in typical Filipiniana gowns- this is 21st century - EVERYTHING IS BEYOND THE STATUS QUO.
Cris Roxas
Gelo Salanga
Kaira Dimatulac
Pau Sebastian
I love the last photo, very fashion editorial-like, heehee. âĽ
Personally, I was really impressed with the outcome of the photos; they were well-executed and well-made ~kudos to our talented photographer/photo editor Gelo Salanga~. This endeavor made me appreciate the beauty, delicacy, and uniqueness of our national garments. Indeed, with the influx of Western clothing and other influences from other countries, we Filipinos tend to forget that we also have something special. Our very own Filipiniana.
Some people might think that wearing Filipiniana is old-fashioned. But I donât believe so. There are still several people who support and wear Filipiniana, not just people from the government. Even designers, socialites and purveyors of fashion, find ways to reinvent and to promote Filipiniana. Why? Because it is something that is ingrained in our culture, a part of our heritage, a treasure of Filipinism. I realized that thinking out of the box and infusing our own individuality could translate into looks that are timeless, yet fashion-forward. So, lets support our own! :)
~Cris, October 9, 2011
*Photos courtesy of Gelo Salanga. :)
OMG THIS IS A THING. how did i not know women in barong was a thing?! :swoon:
ăéĄă
@uptowndolly
Bombed
Progressive Conservatives should support a Land Value Tax
David Cowan 9.51am
In this yearâs Macmillan Lecture, the Conservative MP Nick Boles proposed a series of ideas to improve Britainâs economic competitiveness. By far the most fascinating idea was a land value tax.
In the past it has usually been those on the socialistic Left and the libertarian Right who have advocated a land value tax (LVT). But Mr Boles is a prominent Conservative moderniser, founder of the Policy Exchange think tank, and known to be close to the party leadership.
The introduction of a LVT ought to be viewed as the most legitimate way to raise new revenue.
For too long, landowners and speculators have been able to reap sizeable economic outputs from rising land values, though contributing little economic input. One example being how the construction of the Jubilee line sent surrounding land values shooting up to ÂŁ10 billion, to the benefit of landowners, while taxpayers still had to foot the bill.
The idea strikes to the heart of David Cameronâs vision of responsible capitalism:
âWe need to reconnect the principles of risk, hard work, and success with rewardâ.
Another benefit of LVT is it would create a more stable and productive land market. There would be no benefit in owning land without utilising it since landowners would have to raise enough income to pay the LVT bill. The reduction in speculative activity would help drive down prices and rent, so ensuring that growth in the land market is based on sustainable and real returns instead of artificial and speculative booms.
LVT would also be a new âeco-taxâ that discourages construction on expensive âgreenfieldâ areas in favour of cheaper âbrownfield sitesâ, so limiting urban sprawl. This brings the consequent benefits of reduced commuting distances and less costly road works, which contribute to CO2 emissions and atmospheric pollution.
However, Mr Bolesâ LVT proposal should go a step further. Properties of all shapes and sizes are already overtaxed by the likes of council tax, business rates, stamp duty land tax, planning charges, and landfill tax. If these taxes were to remain then LVT would be burdening people with further unwelcome costs.
Instead, LVT should replace those property taxes - either entirely or at the very least mostly.
It would still raise sufficient revenue if pitched at the correct rate and included main homes, with exemptions for farmland, national parks, charities and pensionersâ main homes. The fact that LVT would also apply to land which at the moment is not taxed at all goes to show how it would raise more revenue than the current property taxes that place a heavy burden on ordinary homeowners.
This would be simple to implement since land cannot be hidden in an offshore tax haven and calculating the tax bill would be made easier by the fact that land values are already measured by the market, therefore compliance costs could be reduced. The same bureaucratic processes for collecting business rates could readily be translated to the collection of LVT.
The LVT would not harm enterprise. It would boost productivity, discourage urban sprawl, could replace the plethora of punitive property taxes, and would be relatively simple to administer and collect.
The extra revenue raised would be enough to fund a radical package of tax cuts to âput fuel into the tank of the British economyâ, as George Osborne promised last year, and would reconnect the link between effort and reward by making sure everyone pays their fair share. This is very much a policy that ought to be part of any modern, progressive Conservative agenda.
Follow David on Twitter @david_cowan

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I went to the Mohatta Place Museum here in Karachi. The bottom half is basically a museum of cartogography of South Asia. The upper half is a museum of textiles and South Asian fashion design. Naturally, I nerded out at the upper half and I bought my notebook and pencil to take notes on pretty much every piece in the exhibit (and there was a lot).
If I could generalize my experience there, I would say that Pakistani fashion (or rather, Indo-Pak fashion?) is so influential on a lot of couture I have seen on the runways. And trade is such a big factor in fashion. I took a lot of notes and will try to find pictures of pieces I saw.
Itâs amazing how fashion and social change are connected. I think one of the first things I saw was the museum talking about how every thread and stitch tells a story.
Pakistani fashion *rules*. We donât get enough of it here in America.
Aurat March 2018.Â
Karachi, Pakistan.Â
Pakistani girls are *hot*, yo.