When the Continental Congress declared independence from Britain, it wasnât just because they didnât like the way the King imposed taxes on the colonies. If you read the Declaration you will see there were a good number of reasons as to why the felt that the King was behaving tyrannically towards the colonies.
When laws were submitted for his approval, King George vetoed them, despite the laws being considered necessary and good by the colonists.
Even when the laws were of immediate and pressing importance, the Governors were not allowed to enact those laws until King George approved them, which if he did not veto the laws would frequently just neglect to confirm or veto.
The King disallowed new communities to be established unless the relinquished their right to representation in the colonyâs legislature.
The colonial governors of Massachusetts and Virginia, citing safety reasons, declared that the meeting sites of the assemblies should be moved. In both cases the new locations were distant from where their public records were kept, which interfered with them conducting the public business. They believe it was done for the sole reason of wearing the legislative bodies down so they would comply with the Kingâs measures instead of standing up for the colonistsâ rights.
The King had, from time to time, ordered the representative bodies of the colonies be dissolved for various reasons, including when they stood up for the rights of the people that the King and Parliament were infringing.
After dissolving those representative bodies, he would refuse to allow new representatives to be elected. This lead to the colonists convening their own legislative bodies outside the authority of the King, which the writers of the Declaration believed still left the colony exposed to the dangers of invasion and rebellion.Â
The King opposed various laws meant to encourage immigration the America, to allow immigrants to become citizens, and to allow the settlement of more land (which was already claimed by the King for the colony.)
The King prevented the administration of justice by refusing to allow the establishment of courts by the colonies, resulting in some states being forced to do without courts of law for a long time.
The King had sole discretion for the tenure, and the amount and payment of the salaries of the Judges, basically requiring them to put the Kingâs personal will above the law to maintain their positions.
The King, in an effort to enforce the increasingly burdensome trade laws, erected additional courts of admiralty (military, not civil) and sent âswarmsâ of customs officials, who, by the claim of the Declaration, âharass[ed] our people, and [ate] out their substance.â
The King kept standing armies among the colonists during times of peace and without the consent of the legislatures.
The King rendered the Military independent of and superior to the Civil powers.
The King allowed Parliament to subject the colonies to various legislation which the colonists felt was unjust including:
Quartering large bodies of armed troops among the colonists.
Protecting the troops, by a mock trial, from punishment of any murders which they may have committed against the colonists.
Cutting off trade with all other nations.
Imposing taxes without consent (the infamous Taxation without Representation.)
Depriving some from the benefits of trial by jury.
Transporting colonists to England to be tried for crimes committed in the colonies.
The passing of the Quebec Act which was seen as an example for introducing the same sort of absolute rule on the colonies.
The taking away of Charters, abolition of valuable laws, and fundamental alteration of the coloniesâ forms of government.
The suspension of the colonistsâ own legislatures and the Parliament declaring themselves invested with the power to legislate for the colonies in all cases.
The King declared that the colonies were out of the Kingâs protection and waged war against the colonists.
The King, by way of his military, attacked the colonists, including burning down several American towns.
The King hired mercenaries who were at the time of the writing en route to the colonies to help wage war against the colonists.
The King authorized the British navy to capture ships and take colonists and compel the colonists to fight for the British against the colonies or be executed.
The King had encouraged slave and Indian revolts against the colonists.
All of this was taken into consideration, including the fact that at every point of these oppressions the colonists had petitioned for redress only to be ignored or have their complaints dismissed. So while taxation without representation played a crucial role, it was by no means the only reason that our founders declared independence from Britain and fought the Revolutionary War.
andulkaphoto
romaincrisis
origamiaround
2087
gamechangershow
ellievsbear
yousharknotpass
