Bradley (MH Advocate)

okay

i dont Like saying favorites in regards to lolcows but i really dont Know how else to phrase this. anyways, ive watched a Lot of content on a lot of different people, so i probably wont talk about just One person. but i do have a significant amount of knowledge on:

daniel larson, novaonline, andrew ditch (regrettably. i wont talk about him a ton but i do have very vocal opinions on those who Do consider him “notable”), pamperchu, cyraxx, icierra, ash trevino (does she count???)

I’ve been trying to sit down and learn about amberlynn reid and boogie2988, but nova has been doing So Much that it’s been next to impossible with how much is coming out every 4 days or so.

if you have any recs pls dm me videos/playlists i an always watching youtube. and i LOVE talking about any of these freaks… do not fear me ok i am kind and sweet

First off, what do i mean by having a “concrete” answer? shouldn’t it be obvious? the guy babytalks and shits in diapers, that should be proof enough!

it isn’t. until recently, we didnt Know how Andrew feels about children. we cant diagnose him or properly ponder on his feelings. while i dont blame anyone for assuming the worst of the guy, i dont think its completely right to jump right to pedophilia as the answer. AB/DL fetishes can exist alongside an attraction to children, but its not mutually exclusive. as disgusting as it is, not all AB/DL freaks are into kids. which is weird to say on paper, but its true.

most youtubers, i think, fail to recognize that fact and take things at extremely face value, which is the easiest thing to do, really when you’re trying to hurry up with a video and get this shit out QUICK so the public can stay informed and aware as to what the squatch is doing now.

do i think all AB/DL fetishists are pedophiles? no. but there are a LOT of them, no? so, its not entirely crazy to assume. I guess this is just a very long way of saying: everyones been thinking this for a while, but i wish the conclusion could have been drawn without explicitly using his obvious fetish as the main pivoting point.

anyways, sorry, now we can verifiably state that Andrew has a high likelihood of being ATTRACTED to them, but we can much more comfortably state that he is a danger to them.

Before i talk about this video, i want to give just a little more context on what we’re working with here. Here are the facts:

1. Andrew has been known to act in infantile ways to make himself appear less of a threat to adult caregivers around him

2. Andrew has “childish” interests and keeps childish items around him (i.e: his tablet, stuffed animals, big ass headphones). My theory is that these items are a sort of fetish gear for him, as well as a part of his second skin as a “mentally disabled” adult

3. He’s inserted himself into children’s spaces

4. He’s had access to children By Himself at least 3+ times.

This is all damning in of itself, but his brother has gone on record to say Andrew hasn’t behaved inappropriately with any juvenile before. While I can believe that he hasn’t done anything physical, I do believe he’s at the minimum grooming these children he Does come near.

This brings me to my first major piece of evidence and ties in with fact #3, Andrew inserting himself into children’s spaces.

(ps: big ups to the chin universe / the buzin faker on YT for all of this, he’s been amazing with nova content and my occasional peek into the squatch)

This video is nearly 46 minutes long. I’ve watched it fully, and I have a lot of thoughts.

Something to keep in mind is that one of these players has 2013 in their username. This was filmed in 2025, placing this child in the 10-12 age range at the time of recording. Along with this, there’s a notably younger sounding voice, a younger sibling. Likely in the SINGLE DIGITS!

This alone would warrant this video to be terrifying, given the circumstances, but you also need to keep in mind that out of 4 people in this lobby, only one person knows Andrew is recording. And thats ANDREW HIMSELF! So, he’s recording a bunch of minors without parental permission or consent? Yes, and while that itself doesn’t indicate attraction or threat, it is still immoral and illegal (as far as I’m aware, at least).

Something else is how these kids talk to Andrew. They coach him into kills, opt to have him on their team, stand up for him, and one person instructs the group to not kill him. They treat him as if he’s not a grown man that’s had plenty of years to hone his video gaming skills and rather, a fellow young child thats new to the game. They walk on eggshells around him, desperately trying not to kill him or do anything that would upset him. One kid even yells at another for shooting his character.

And Andrew ENABLES it. He feeds into this gross fantasy he has surrounded himself with by talking in short, blunt, almost babbling sentences. Its horrifying listening to him try to sound small and young, despite the audible timbre of grown man he desperately tries to shove down.

We all know he’s had years to hone in his gaming skills, so he could smoke any one of them even if he’s never played Fortnite a day in his life. Then again, he does 1v1 one of them later on and genuinely displays some of the most lackluster shooting I have ever seen. I could beat Andrew Ditch in a 1v1, and I have brain damage AND motor impairments!

Then again, it’s hard to tell if this is genuine sucking or him ONCE AGAIN trying to appear helpless for the sake of his fetish. Its easier on my stomach to imagine he sucks at games.

If you know anything about kids, you know they’re probably not going to treat a grown man like this organically. Which comes back to my grooming theory. Is he instructing these kids to treat him like a young child? How long has he had access to this group? How long has he talked to them in order to establish this dynamic with them?

Or is there a 3rd party here?

This video comes a good while after the Fortnite gameplay but at its core, its Andrew on the phone with APS freaking out because he’s not allowed to invite kids into his group home’s room without supervision.

Which, fucking duh, right?

But what comes up is that one of his caretakers has been allowing her son to come to work with her to hang out with Andrew. In his room. Without parental overlook. Now, I’m far from parenting age, but I would hope someone would have enough common sense to not allow a grown man alone with a small child, let alone in his ROOM? The “mentally disabled” argument should not be the reason he can get away with this! Because he ISN’T! He’s fully aware of what he’s doing.

And this video is absolutely proof of that.

This near hour long video details a fantasy acted out with Andrew’s AAC program. Unrelated, but his use of AAC tools pisses me off. I’ve had to use AAC devices in the past because I’m ACTUALLY mentally disabled. So, to see him writing sex fantasy works while giggling about how “gross” it is really does make me wish he’d gotten reversed over when he was ran over on the way to work.

I watched a much more clean cut version of this video, without all the heavy breathing and giggles in between typings. Its a fantasy about a man (Andrew or not is debatable) luring a “little girl” away with the promise of ice cream and instructing her to put on a diaper and use it. WOW! Never thought I would type that out.

This alone is incriminating, as no one just Does this unless they have thought about scenarios like this frequently. In this video, he intricately details his fetish Right there. On paper.

So, to know that a man who’s capable of producing disturbing fantasies around actual children was left alone with a child in his room? Unimaginable.

Now, I can finally tell you about recent developments! Thanks for reading all of that, by the way. There’s going to be MORE of that on my blog, so prepare your anus.

The aforementioned was released 10 or 11 hours ago, but was hinted at the 30th of June. In the video, the buzin’ faker tells us this all happened 2 days ago. This places us at the 28th of June when this all happened, roughly. if i got dates wrong here, i don’t care enough about Andrew to research this incident further than what I have.

The questioning is maybe 5 minutes or shorter, absolutely not an interrogation by any means. The agent and the officer accompanying her stand on the doorstep while Andrew shoves a camera at them and insists on his posts being “bait” for the haters to interact so he could grab THEIR information and send it over to the police! Its not illegal if you’re doing it to BAIT

So, what was so bad that it warranted police coming to his group home and questioning him???

YEP! He SAID that shit!

This really doesn’t need commentary.

There’s also this, which was a picture of an AI generated child on his bed with a tablet.