Constructive Criticism and Flames (Feedback)
Both Constructive Criticism and Flames are types of Feedback from the reader of an FanFiction to the writer that are meant to âcriticizeâ. Yet both do so in completely different ways.Â
In the case of Constructive Criticism is meant to help an writer to get better by telling what they could improve on. This could be by pointing out and even showing how to fix spelling and grammar mistakes. If the wording is a bit off the reader suggest how to fix it. Constructive criticism is not meant to be mean to the writer but to help them improve their skills.Â
An example of constructive criticism would be if someone forgot to put the quotation marks and the reader points it out.
With Flames on the other hand are meant to be mean to the writer. Its a form of cyber bullying that is masked as criticism. Even a flamer on FanFiction.net says so;Â â I know heâs mean; I know he does not discriminate by age, and yes, itâs bullyingâ-however, there is usually a good reason why he targeted your story.â ( Honest101, p 4).Â
If these people really wanted to help they could of used constructive criticism. This is because constructive criticism is how we learn. A teacher is not going to tell their student that their writing is so bad that monkey could do better. No the teacher would tell the student what went wrong and what they can work on so they can do better next time.
Feedback to fanfiction writers should be more about giving advice and in joying our love for the same fandoms. Â
https://www.fanfiction.net/topic/47551/6723659/1/Flamers-Flaming-Flames-Oh-My (Honest101)
https://www.fanfiction.net/community/Stories-That-a-Turd-Out-of-My-Ass-Could-Write-Better/42849/
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/constructive-criticism.html
https://hellogiggles.com/lifestyle/difference-between-constructive-criticism-and-bullying/