

blake kathryn
we're not kids anymore.

titsay

ā
taylor price

dirt enthusiast
i don't do bad sauce passes
AnasAbdin
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć

Product Placement
d e v o n

@theartofmadeline

Andulka
Show & Tell
Cosimo Galluzzi
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
trying on a metaphor
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Colombia
seen from Malaysia

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Canada

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@ertobcc

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Meshes decide

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Kari Altmann
HAZING - in conversation with http://karialtmann.com/
Documentation from Core Samples: Blackmoth.info Body Piercings, 2011
We talked previously about an emphasis on Tumblr in dialogue surrounding your work ā would you say thereās a frustration in repeating yourself in conversations such as these? Iām wondering if there is a sense here of art reflecting the logic of the meme, and what sort of power structures this might in turn reveal. Ā This first answer will probably be the longest⦠ Repetitive questions are normal, especially with work that employs mystery, but maybe this ties more into your prompt below about scattered identity. Artists definitely feel pressure to be a branded thing, summed up by someone in charge going through a list of names and saying, āThis artist makes this and that artist makes that,ā and making sure itās all diverse but similar enough to be presented as a teamed organism that communicates some pre-determined message. Ā Looking at things like VVork in the past few years makes it clear just how much is being created in all the scenes about a lot of the same general memes and topics in the canon. It seems like an obvious answer to specialize in a way that stands out from that: by relying on that generality and striking some specific and disparate frequency, which can be a hierarchical game in its own right, or by joining then diversifying from the packs of like-minded peers you group with through time, which can also be a dizzying process. It becomes like a game of adding some unique vital ability to the organism in order to stay attached. Especially when your peer network becomes connected abstractly through the net, you can find yourself falling to the whims of the pack or the platforms out of efficiency. But of course art as a learning process needs to be exempt from the pressures of product and community at times, so you need to hold on to the freedom of being general, private, repetitive, or discordant. Iām captivated by that notion of unification and diversification within a group that forms based on attractors, detractors, and environment. Online, your morphology can actually go both ways and beyond.
Ā Ā Ā One trope the internet should help alleviate is this notion of the artist having a single āthingā that they do. When youāre in control of all the elements that brand you, frame you, and disseminate you, why not diversify that portfolio?
Ā Ā If youāre the one platforming yourself, it makes it much easier for people to see a fuller body of content in one clickable horizon. Youāre not forced to put it all into one packaged showroom artwork, one moment, or one style that can be cherry-picked. Focus is still important, and distilling things down to specificity is a good way to get a message across, but branding yourself is something to be wary of more than ever. Those forces are so strong, now! I still go back and forth between generalist and specialist, which the internet allows, because your sites are the most meta frames. You can oscillate between anonymity and entity, and you can travel from context to context in a split second. The cross-hairs are continuously on the move, which is more congruent with how mobile lives have become. Being in control of your own aggregational destiny, so to speak, allows you to retain the final context, which can mean holding on to direction rights and humanity when the hype market wants you to be submissive and bot-like. Itās a constant play fight, but with that choice of authority you can actually afford to play a lot more. When artists become too eager to be objectified they are ripe for external plucking and branding, and the platforms are going to go where the ācostā is lowest, sometimes. Ā The expectation of brand is also a somewhat inescapable force now, so for me the trick is to be this metabeast brand director and legitimately do whatever I want from day to day, then figure out a way to organize it all into its own teams later. The serial approach seems pretty natural for a process that provides in-real-time control. Creating, naming, and ordering cloud directory structures is also a creative act. Ā Ā
Ā After getting hired to do so much brand interpretation and art direction, where your entire job is to locate some āessenceā and then make sure itās present in all of an entityās visual and verbal output, it just makes sense to treat art with the same production schedule, especially with the research tools that are now available. Thatās not to say all my work is organized that way, but itās one strategy that still seems efficient. Even more efficient is to use a brand whose real estate already exists, but is hazy enough to allow for a much needed personal reuse that has nothing to do with the original. Ā
Ā TTOSHIBAA: 10,000 IMPRESSIONS, 2010 Ā I still think of my āartist websiteā as the big piece or the real product in a way, though itās 2011 and still no show has ever presented it as one. Curators and bloggers still tend to want to shop it for works a la carte, instead of presenting the full scenes or the networked teams. After some time youāre almost forced to start succumbing to the notions of the standalone product in order to get the message across in those contexts, and to lure people back to your site. Then it becomes a question of what people are experiencing in something like a gallery: is it all just a demo, a prop, or a sample for the real thing elsewhere? Itās an old topic but still surprisingly unaddressed when install time rolls around.
This is a result of the way art venues (and many art portfolio websites) still tend to work as product showrooms of cultural craft and artist names become memes that get reblogged around from different tastemaking sites. You can really watch all these exchanges from platform to platform and predict trickle down trends. It becomes easier online to see who is exploring and going deep, and who is just gleaning things from surfaces elsewhere. (The quirks of networked knowledge or culture communities are a whole other topic.) In the age of the reblog it becomes harder to identify primary sources. Especially when a lot of cultural producers are trying to recycle or rebrand while working in packs, you have to be sharp about who is authoring or producing an idea and who isnāt. What are the other actions and what kind of value should be placed on them? I am trying to be in control of my place in that, is all. There have been a few times when hype waves have tried to turn into undertow and define what my āthingā is for me. A lot of it has just become like tagging, and at times these contact emails seem like theyāre running on algorithms. I mean who are you, Harry Burke? Ā The way internet search services and similar content formulas are developing is really key. A lot of my projects are about reacting in kind.
Excerpt from R-U-In?S Similar Image Haul: Magic Eye XD for K48, 2010 Iām game, but Iām trying to do more in-person, direct presentations where I can create more controlled environments, so that the exported aggregation of the internet is not too dominant. I really havenāt done a lot of shows or events where Iām actually in control, working with a venue I know very well, or resource-enabled. Itās all been extremely outsourced and translated, which Iāve tried to work into my approach. I want more āyou had to be thereā in 2012. This has all been talked about before and concepts like memes are obviously just how social things work already. Perhaps the difference now is the internet revealing it on such a large and instant scale that these patterns become a lot more apparent? Or that itās now easier to control (and test) with one small gesture that becomes extremely amplified through an instant and specialized network echo? Any ident can find a platform, audience, and all the resources it needs to open for business in a few minutes. It can also be bootlegged or ripped off in an hour. Repetitive questions are a result of peopleās entry point being one thing or another based on whatās been framed for them, as in what portal has been presented and vetted in some way by an outside source. Going to my site doesnāt always provide those concrete answers for a surface user. There is a big focus on Tumblr and the projects on it right now, because those are the easiest things to follow. You can go right into them, theyāre super reblog friendly, and people are more likely to see what youāre doing on a platform theyāre on socially like that than deep troll yourname.com directly. Maybe this is where I ask for this interview to be more like some promo questionnaire. Ask me my favorite color, or about where I grew up! Just donāt ask me more of the same questions about Tumblr and how the internet works? Or maybe I just say āitās all part of the performance.ā Then we post some pic you took of me hanging at the mall during our interview with lots of lens flares.
Pic of me at the interview with lens flare B-] Probably frustrating to be asked that as a first question, or in fact at all. But I like your response. (In response to external Skype conversation about webcam pic) You asked me questions about performed gender after seeing this pic, which you admitted was the first youād ever seen. Did you think I was a dude before? Itās not the first time. Dirk from JODI is among the people who have been fooled, even. I call this phenomenon āKarl Artmanā. Lol. Well not really, but I wasnāt sure at one point, but only in the way like when you know you locked your front door but still for some reason you think you havenāt and then donāt know whether to check or notā¦levels of ambiguity. But thatās pretty funny, if not maybe relieving on my part as well. Iām reading Sexual Personae right now, Iād highly recommend it. Really entertaining. To what extent do you perceive your online archiving as performative? Would this be altered if, say, Ā the images were collated on a hard drive (following the model of a painter in her studio) rather than blogs? Iām wondering whether itās upon publication that such research becomes an artistic act or if itās something more integral, more process-based. Not so sure what youāre asking, here. Everything is also on hard drives, and people putting art online is not new? Are you talking about directory structure as art? Thatās how more and more people are using their sites: as cloud mirrors of their hard drives with a few additional filters. In this way production and research are more conjoined, things are more live, and you can contribute to shared groups if you have something that doesnāt fit anywhere in yours. Or maybe this is in response to me explaining that my site is not always a showroom, which is the same ideaā¦.
Iām wondering how internet artistās practice would be affected if they didnāt publish it online, at least not immediately. Of course they would no longer be āinternet artistsā per se, but with so many people rejecting this term, it seems interesting to try and work out where the boundaries lie. I mean I donāt post everything online, and certainly not immediately. I guess a lot of it is at least listed, thumbnailed, or demoāed in some way to add itself to the overall impression. Net-friendly stuff ends up online naturally but I donāt consider a lot of my work to be internet art per se. Since my site is the piece Iām really working on every day, I guess it all gets framed as that, though. I make everything with my websites in mind, even if it canāt properly be experienced there. It depends. Right now Iām actually more into 3d/4d modeling, plants, bike helmets, and constructing things from Ebay and CVS materials, but thatās a āthing,ā too, computer artists trying to prove that they do other, non-computer things! There is still such a public stigma about technology, itās surprising. I thought the internet hysteria was sort of dying in 2005. I guess I was wrong? Arenāt artists usually hesitant about āgenreficationā ? The terminology of internet art, post internet art, art 2.0 v. 3.0, etc. is still a bit arguable. I like post internet because itās like an annoyed reaction, but of course everything has overlap. Itās helpful to differentiate between approaches, but it eventually seems limiting because of all the bizarre things that get ascribed to the meme of it by others. A lot of talk about virtual art gets wrapped up in coverage of the platforms and mediums, aiming to place it all in a tech product lineage or the history of social media instead of what the art actually is and what the artist is about. Itās like seeing the work for its parts! This goes back to that generality and authorship issue. This is also what leads to the same questions over and over, the same articles being written over and over, as well as the same art pieces about technology being made over and over. Even shows are guilty of this at times: promoting the novelty of the system instead of facilitating the art that is giving life to the system. Everything gets flattened into this homogeneous idea of ācontentā or āparticipationā in support of some other framework and it can all get very gimmick-y. That type of feudal, territorial activity is wonderfully ideal for some things, but not always great for going deeper. Users are not all the same, content and art are not all the same and shouldnāt be referred to in a lump sum. Right? Are artists actually annoyed by those tags? Or are they just trying to make sure the terminology stays diverse so they donāt get type cast into a shelf life? The tag is usually already attached if they are reacting to it and genres donāt always get to choose their own name (IDM, WITCH HOUSE, SEAPUNK). Iāll go along with them if they apply, sure, whatever helps, but I prefer āmetamediaā and āwi-fi #basedā for now. They will continue to change as new topics emerge. Perhaps there is some sort of relationship here between the rhizomatic structures so commonly celebrated in online territories and their inevitable commercialisation, or commercial colonisation. In this sense the hackneyed genres that get picked up by the big rebloggers would be the commercialised nodes, reshaped and contested by their new traffic flow. (Genrefication as abstract gentrification??? http://www.google.co.uk/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=genrefication) And artistsā exploitation of these offers a model with which to consider their dynamics up to, even beyond, this point. Iām glad to see genrefy becoming a more official word ;) Itās an important question right now, not least because of Americaās positioning of itself as an ideational economy, one whose aim is now to mastermind the branding and concept behind outsourced production. Jaron Lanier talks about this a lot, and David Graeberās recent debt book is clarifying how payment is not ābecomingā virtual but returning to a virtual state. Hypebucks are legitimate currency on the web. These hierarchical cultural battles and subsuming tendencies are, of course, completely mirrored or even foreshadowed online. To what extent do you see your artistic identity distributed / decentralised in your numerous blogs and online activities? Is this is a fragmentation or more of an integration? I feel like this is just a normal desire extended by technology throughout history. When you have that grand, master view of the network, you are free to roam, even from your tiny outpost in it. Power User! Itās a very imperialized lens, far beyond the mechanics of any camera. The roving eye now has its virtual extension, for which there is this dangerous mirage of globalized infinite zoom on an x-y-z scale. That process of generalizing and specifying finds an endless supply, here. There are trends tied to this, too, from having a really open and scattered online presence to a really closed and specific one. For me this depends on what Iām working on at the time, which is the biggest decider of my online mood. Somehow I feel like Iām typing this in response to a lot of social internet situations?? Like, āSorry but I was busy,ā or āIt was all a part of the project.ā Navigating the divide between these tiny specific audiences and the great beyond of being wifi-based can be intense. I have to say though, having an array of acting projects or identities is really helpful because it keeps whatever karialtmann.com is very free. Your artistic model seems to advocate a very proactive relationship with the information environment, a sort of humanistic enabling through information tools. Are you an advocate of network ecologies? The first issue of Radical Software (1970) suggested, āOur species will survive neither by totally rejecting nor unconditionally embracing technology - but by humanising it; by allowing people access to the information tools they need to shape and reassert control over their lives.ā I wouldnāt say Iām an advocate, but my work is a response to its habitat.
Garden Club, 2009-ongoing Is there a certain logic to your image-aggregating projects? Perhaps you could relate this to your notion of āhuman search algorithmsā and the fact that youāve run into people online who donāt see the underlying structure. The logic is a vital logic. Each project is figuring out a way to survive in the hype economy, either by colonizing more content or diversifying itself, creating some emergent new sub-product, or simply outlasting its bootleg competitors by reaggregating them. If it fails to go viral it makes that failure part of its statement so that it can outlive the lack of favs or reblogs it gets, or it crafts a way to be part of a bigger statement. Basically by setting up these accounts Iām creating an attractor, an algorithm, that starts to build its own DNA sequence of parameters and set up shop via a results page. Itās sampling each post for the material and labor it needs to keep going, like a rebranding parasite. Once its parameters reach a certain critical mass, they can start to colonize everything. (Itās alive!) Even the R-U-In?S project at one point became about explaining itself, and it was a really brand-fatigued era. People who are somehow participating in it donāt always get it, but thatās a part of the territory. I have a background thatās found me in a lot of different creative communities, including online ones, and Iāve seen what fizzles out and what outlasts the social group. R-U-In?S for me was just a different approach than anything Iād been a part of before. The way itās structured represents a trickled down, black-market-mutated global economy, one in which distanced research entities communicate primarily through their reproduced image-object goods and rebrands in a very public marketplace full of mistranslation, competition, ripoffs, forced diversification, and constantly morphing call and response that is not so obvious to a general audience who isnāt participating. It started as a looted artifact trade based on treating the results of search queries as anthropological records, and itās grown to encompass all kinds of products and materials in its lexicon of critical currency. Each meme tries to build tiny empires through exchange routes over time that are either supported or abandoned. Thatās why the presentations of it have leaned toward Trade Shows, Catalogues, Storefronts, Meeting Rooms, etc. An unspoken social contract develops between each entity as they become entangled. Itās like some warped surf club between fake brands. Even though itās a project about misappropriation, Iāve had to stand up for it a few times as it gets aggregated into the wrong context. In some ways these arguments are a part of the project, too, because itās all about researching those structures. In the end it always tries to aggregate those conflicts back into its premise, which forces the premise to expand again. Visual literacy can be a problematic topic in the blogosphere, especially for people who aren'tĀ privy to a behind-the-scenes understanding of media production.Ā Of course, it also depends on a shared library of references, but thatās why the projects I have on Tumblr have this āmost common denominatorā element to them. Theyāre presented as seemingly obvious (obnoxious?) memes. Thatās part of how they lure you into their back-end, and into working for them. You start to see them everywhere. In viral fav networks like those, you have to try to embed the criticality inside that lure, inside something that can become really commodified based on the ecology it exists in, so that even people who are mindlessly spreading it for all the wrong reasons or trolling it are still somehow working for the cause. No labor is wasted. Itās a hierarchical game, but itās also part of the comment. You can get much better content when people are acting as the algorithms. You become each otherās search bots, voluntarily or not. Aggregational times, Harry, aggregational times! I like the logic of your responses to Gene McHugh, in that they highlight the mutability of the critical text, too often misinterpreted as rigid and invariable.Ā Also that such texts have their own patterns of circulation, around the internet and in the more abstract intellectual sphere.
But what relationship should the artist have with their own surrounding critical discourse? Are there any parallels here with the instant feedback you must experience in your own online networks, both amongst your peers and in wider (internet) circles?
Geneās writings on Post Internet were really just a performative blog of looking at things online and responding. In some cases heād talked to me about the ideas beforehand for over a year, and in some he hadnāt. Essentially they are still his reads, his proposals, with some influence from me. He works as a curator so his texts reflect that, but it was also partially about the experience of coming across things on the internet and trying to figure them out. It stood out because it was actually considered and involved with a lot of the artists it covered. Itās funny that it became such a thing! There really isnāt much directly engaged writing going on about the things I find myself talking about with people on Gchat or at the bar because artists are usually focused on putting it into their work. A lot of posting online is being done by people who have just gone to three urls and a party, so itās extremely speculative. Thatās to be expected, but when thatās all that is ever documented in writing about an artistās work, those blog posts wind up circulating around, getting printed, and being treated like primary documents when they definitely arenāt. In the case of art online thereās often still a lot of basic presentational framing missing. When filmmakers or musicians release a project, itās quite an ordeal. Thereās a ton of context and itās very clear what the product is and who is behind it. Those things can be missing in a process aiming beyond a product method, where people assume anything they see on your site to be āitā and begin writing about āitā in the same moment. Product-oriented thinking is still so engrained. I mean at this point most artists are just an email away so itās assumed that people are going to open up a direct communication line with questions. Talking about it all is very easy, but posting it online becomes a different beast, partially because of the nature of online content and comment section polemics. Whatever press or criticism is, is now bound up in the same muddy arenas with everything else. Plus, you know, you donāt want to contribute to the problem. Trying to create some kind of respectful record of very deep currents takes a lot of time and care. Is any blog the end-all-be-all or the final word? No. There should be a lot more people doing what Gene did, if theyāre interested. I consider my Tumblr accounts like publishing outlets, but things that arenāt text-based or book-formatted arenāt always recognized as a form of discourse. I try to show them as documentary films, too. Gene was happy I posted responses because he meant for his blog to be a conversation-starter, and was surprised more artists didnāt do the same (so heās said). Having something to bounce off of and respond to is really helpfulā for instance free range interview prompts like this one with no word or content limit. I wouldnāt write about a lot of these topics normally because Iāve heard them talked about so much, but I forget they might not be as accessible as they could be. So I donāt mind the repetitive questions too much. Thatās why Iām interested in projects like Geneās and others that are more collaborative, because they actually assist artists in the research and citation process, which aids them in representing themselves instead of contributing to the pattern of outsourcing the artist into oblivion. Writing for me is usually post-mortem for when a project is over, and I still donāt think that everything needs to be accompanied by texts, nor do I think any artist should publish those texts until they are ready to do it at a level theyāre proud of. In the meantime, there is another big job on deck. You talk about instant feedback but just as an fyi, that doesnāt always happen. Because things connected online are very geographically distanced, even talk about each otherās work can be just as speculative as a result of the lack of contact. When artists have access to each other, they donāt always use it productively, and thatās contributing to the lack of substance. You can only get so far through emails or vague notions of one another. The grant to give would be something that gathers everyone in one place, say, for the big 2012 party. Just a thought! The internet or any kind of scene recognition can actually make people more paranoid about sharing ideas and expressing reactions as much as it can facilitate it. There seems to be this assumption that any productive artist is part of an equally rigorous critical peer group, and that theyāve had tons of practice arguing out all of their ideas. Everyone still seems to assume that whateverās happening in this area of art is very distanced from them, as though everyone involved is some mega celebrity with their own separate livesā¦but surprise! You are a participant in something still relatively specific, small, and blossoming, and it might be more up to you than you even realize. You are not outside the network, you are a node. Ā I wind up explaining this a lot: itās up to art venues and others in the audience to commission (or at least request) a lot of the ideas listed on the site into final presentations, and itās up to you to ask the questions you want answered. Itās not that there is no thought or conversation going on about this! Itās just that itās not always done justice or publicized properly because of that haze. [brands heterogeneity / state. work as an exploration of flux? -> relation to location / lived patterns? -> (how) does this relate to (e-)waste?] ^ Are these questions youāre working on? I guess there arenāt many questions specifically aboutā¦what, personhood? Which might be nice to tap into⦠As I was saying before, artist interviews tend to be really meta online, almost to the point of being droll? Iāve just finished typing out two different interviews, both of which found me talking about brains in jarsā¦
!! Perhaps Iām really guilty of that. Or maybe the internet leads quite naturally to abstracted modes of thinking. Itās already proven that our cognitive abilities are being reshaped by new media, the obvious example being increasing disability to recall proper terms, with emphasis on process (the google search) subduing the actual remembering. Even that example sort of supports itself. Thus I guess we shouldnāt overlook the virtue of conversation around something as seemingly arbitrary as a favourite colour. I canāt even think if I have one now. Yeah the questions get so concept-driven that thereās this pressure to make it that primary document. I just went through this and deleted even more because I find myself using interview prompts and gmail faqās as an excuse to start branching off into an essay, but those are a different format with a responsibility to cite and reference. I want to avoid that pressure when Iām just typing a conversational Gdoc to someone I donāt know, you know? Not to mention the need now, at the end of typing, to add a lot of interesting links and content, like that Delicio.us TL;DR pressureā¦Iāll go through now and add some, plus those mall pics. lol. How much of Kari Altmann as a person is manifest in your presence on the internet? Is the personality of the artist something that appeals to you? Right now Iām really into artistsā backgrounds and personal behavior. I want to know all the gossip! Obviously Iām interested in networks and power relationshipsā¦I love a good face-off. Iām always relieved to find out all the complicated, torrid social histories that parallel the ones Iāve been a part of in all these scenes. I would much rather be a part of something where everyone cares so much and is going through all these turbulent, deep, and weird things together than faking it or acting super blank. Or even worseā playing it safe, standing for nothing, or doing nothing at all. Itās proof of vitality when there is friction and heat, and thatās what makes those sparks, you know? The alternative is a group of really afraid people doing things that are ultimately forgettable and lost with time. Nobody learns anything. As for me, Iām just available enough online, and itās about 15% of the picture. Iām sure there is a personality tone that pervades a lot of my online activity. Itās part of my approach to the internet, though: I have slumber party mode and then CEO death cubicle mode. Isnāt this all a video game anyway? http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Internet_(video_game). Final question: Whatās your favourite color? Tempted to answer with flourescent beigeā¦but for the sake of fav colors and artist backgrounds: there is a certain color scheme that Iām really attracted to, one that can be described as āCrepusculoā.
Korean WorldPhone Card, bought in Seoul in 2007
Samsung Plasma TV Trade Show Image Iām approaching this as an art direction, but I think my attraction to it is twofold: 1. The range of colors makes for really rich images which obviously seem more āvaluable.ā 2. Itās embedded into palettes that surrounded me growing up in Texas, which are part of a larger sensation. Not just the muted soil tones of the Silicon Prairie land and the sunlit shades of wide blue skies over superflat horizons, but also the pink bricks of superluxe houses, the concrete of highways and spread out telecom companies, and the mix of dusty, desert-like air with super glossy big-money consumer culture. One of the reasons Texas attracts so many start-ups and franchises is quite literally because of the land: there is tons of it, itās flat, itās dry, itās cheap, and there is no state tax. Not so great for plants and animals but ideal for corporations. Ironically it turns into clay or bedrock pretty quickly as you dig down so things have to be built on very shallow foundations; very few of these developments go below surface level. Marble malls, sparkling limestone Mcmansions, leather Lexus interiors, ice cold air conditioning, tons of slippery blue, black, and gold glass, and lots of franchise-y indoor l.e.d. lighting schemes from a city that was absolutely booming and crashing in the 1990s and early 2000s. It gets more and more desert-like in memory, actually. It was this strange mix of liquid and arid, like a coating of luxury conditioner over this barren frontier-type landscape. It felt geological and synthetic at once? Just something very immediate and chemically enhanced placed over lands that felt very prehistoric and reptile-friendly. The fantasy-image used to plow the earth, you know?
Image from BLOOD:\ (MOBILE UPLOADS), taken in Las Vegas, 2010 Every place has its own flavor of this. The only other places Iāve been that have moments of the same aftertaste are more recently developed parts of L.A. and Las Vegas, both of which are a total mindfuck, and this is part of my fascination with seemingly similar landscapes and cities Iāve yet to visit like Dubai. This is also a color profile that cameras tend to enhance under generic white balance settings, and one that photographers aim for at āmagic hourā, which is a block of time when the outside light is at its most pornographic. Itās especially attractive for product images that need to sell that idea of nutrient-rich luxury, or for people shooting in HD.
The places Iāve lived since then have all been extremely different, by no accident. This sort of material was the impetus for projects like blackmoth.org and blackmoth.info, which are interested in locating an earthbound geological materiality in the formations of images left behind by the climes of media production, a method which finds its niche among projects by Heim Steinbach and Robert Smithson. Richard Kelly is also a huge comrade.
I think the project has ended or at least hit a stopping point with Core Samples, and on Tumblr itās developed a nice network of similar content.
Documentation from Core Samples: Blackmoth.info Body Piercings, 2011
*
http://karialtmann.com/

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The poor image is an illicit fifth-generation bastard of an original image. Its genealogy is dubious. Its filenames are deliberately misspelled. It often defies patrimony, national culture, or indeed copyright. It is passed on as a lure, a decoy, an index, or as a reminder of its former visual self. It mocks the promises of digital technology. Not only is it often degraded to the point of being just a hurried blur, one even doubts whether it could be called an image at all. Only digital technology could produce such a dilapidated image in the first place. Poor images are the contemporary Wretched of the Screen, the debris of audiovisual production, the trash that washes up on the digital economiesā shores. They testify to the violent dislocation, transferrals, and displacement of imagesātheir acceleration and circulation within the vicious cycles of audiovisual capitalism. Poor images are dragged around the globe as commodities or their effigies, as gifts or as bounty. They spread pleasure or death threats, conspiracy theories or bootlegs, resistance or stultification. Poor images show the rare, the obvious, and the unbelievableāthat is, if we can still manage to decipher it.
Hito Steyerl āIn Defence of the Poor Image,ā e-flux journal, April 2008 (via greatleapsideways)
Future

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming