❝ 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘴 ❞

Damn. I knew Billy's last name came from Halloween. But naming Billy's daughter Sam? Sam and Samantha are different names. But her name is shortened to Sam.

Stu and Randy often theorized together. Although Stu occasionally teases Randy, especially when it comes to Sidney, it never comes across as malicious mockery. It seems Stu genuinely cares about Randy's opinion as a fellow horror fan, eager to understand the genre and establish its rules.

Furthermore, in the final act, Stu seems in no hurry to kill Randy. Despite his cries of Randy being the killer, he actually pushes him away, not wanting him to enter the house. After all, Stu and Billy intended to stay there. Billy, however, shot Randy without hesitation when he finally entered.

In the second installment of the franchise, the relationship between Mickey and Randy is presented as similar to Randy's with Stu, but stronger. Mickey seems to be the only character in the group who takes Randy seriously, sharing his ardent love of horror films. I'm sure Randy and Mickey would have made a great duo if Mrs. Loomis hadn't killed him.

Furthermore, Randy's negative comments about Billy likely weren't because he truly believed them, but because he was trying to buy time for his friends.

The characters were left undeveloped, even the introduction of the new Ghostfaces was overlooked. The plot was too focused on Sydney's life, her family, and her relationship with her eldest daughter.

The murder method remained largely unchanged: "punch a hole in the head." The first Scream had fewer murders, but at least Billy and Stu were more creative in their unexpected appearances.

The trailers clearly hinted at Stu's return, but in the end, we only got one brief moment with a phone call, where he has realistic scars on his face and says something before he dies. And in the final act, there are some random Ghostfaces who seem to have no idea why they were killing.

It would have been more logical to add at least some hint that these killers had communicated with the real Stu but didn't take it seriously due to mental issues. This move could have been developed from the script for the third part, where Stu, sitting in prison, brainwashes teenagers.

If Stu had a relative (basically, he already does). And he followed in the killer's footsteps. What if he had a motive to portray himself as the victim in this story. To clear the Macher family name. Sydney became a hero in this hell. And Stu's brother/sister was simply forgotten. He looks at Sidney Prescott, who was able to turn her trauma into strength, wrote a book, became a symbol of survival, and he begins to feel sick.

I have a question: where could the documents about Stu's death have disappeared to? It's impossible without relatives. Besides, Sydney never went to the cemetery to see Stu when she really wanted to. She only called about the documents. Thanks a lot.