minimal effort

This was and is my understanding the difference between financial inclusion and market access, (｀_´)ゞenjoy! (Also, the econo-fantasy stuff is a few posts down…)

So, what inspires the basic levels of such entry is a healthy municipal sector and its advantages of scale, yet more so today, with overwhelming rationale for global production and growth intentions bolstered by the latest and greatest in digital scarcity protocols.  

Market access is fairly simple: an overwhelming majority in your country (possibly 2nd or 3rd world) specializes in civil engineering because that region in itself needs its civility developed or less likely, re-developed. Do these denizens have the liberal arts colleges and other grandiose freedoms attained, not unlike some of our western plights? No, however, they do experience a measurable complacency; an overall dimension of guidance and settlement— to eventually satisfy their commitment within a government’s product guidelines and even more anti-democratically of ‘good’ political theory, to their influencing regulators (if not happening like this today, regarding fixed web 3.0 development). Financial inclusion is actually quite different, as it suggests even a marginal participatory role in what is now possibly globalized governance would matter in some part to what is a singular ‘growth aggregate.’ Such inclusion and ultimately increased participation would tend to lean towards a type of pooled model for pricing causality in the commerce of its digitalization (or more directly, success with the model of price discovery via capital supply, demand, and its arbitrage— as the liabilities, equities, and assets held through any public subsidy are generally entries to be made transparent by their local perspectives: a basis for the augmentation of these variables). 

The cultural experiment of who survives in the consultive position for digital currencies— with quantum encryption durable blockchains as much as they are the hype of sharing what would be, formerly, open corporate responsibility, and representing only half of this quasi-diversified industry, must absolutely consider any unique importance other than storing hash-able frameworks that aren’t particularly assigned to a problem of ‘solution myopia.’ Those being pragmatic efforts to change the science of data; as the space itself’s only and obvious requirement to succeed is how much opportunity over time (and so it seems ethically now, having to distance from various black market phenomena while also from pedestrian-like value in micro lending finance), it can ultimately offer.  

Let’s say even one bond issued from a long-term holder of Bitcoin would go on to support whole economies if the cryptocurrency’s inflation is indeed a non-finite issuance— if not by the multiplicity of function has the fate of such actors already been written in the seeding of viable entrepreneurship. Retrospectively, how much do traditional markets involve the screening or blockage of novel decentralized themes*, comprehensively against what is similar in limiting emerging markets of considerably less adherent economies of scope? [*note, 03/22: The perpetuation of ‘capping’ sector variety and marketplace functionality, is unavoidably creating the generalized introduction to structural fees amidst peaky actor deficit rates.]

anomaly of risk space… near field aggregates… 

Today, the reserve of cryptocurrencies as a whole desires risk more than ever, and quite standardly is left unfulfilled by its actors— whom are also encompassing the tireless burdens of being without a foundational unit of account for the space (other than Bitcoin, of course). Prototypes for b2b or p2p wallets have indeed gone mainstream, yet an instability with unfamiliar IEO/ICOs hint at the non-correlative notion between any systemic considerations and the wealth of healthy transactional resources. This current state has led me to conceptualize the maintenance of integrative utility amongst a collective, and subsequently with partnering governments— who in theory are crypto’s primary competition in the longer term. The technology surrounding the blockchain is seemingly effectuated only to unravel problems of real-time consensus (curiously pairing the abstractions of game logic to a coin or token’s scarcity: the axiom of choice selection relative to mining rewards), still while many other pathways of encrypting shared data have yet to be applied using a comparable sense of perfect information (i.e. diversionary yet sustainable vector metrics). Qualitatively and informally this “arming of indication" is the result of what is a bottom line in turning good companies… into great ones! Continual advancing of these reference ledgers especially for indexing, calculating, re-hashing, estimating, or adjudicating prices, taxes, compensation, acquisitions, income, and production will ultimately create true economy depth in having effective controls for the future of lifestyle/trend marketing and entrepreneurial/ecological transparency. At length, goals to closely fund each basic ‘register convenience’ seems why our active or tentative suggestion of Meshcoin is the quintessence of pragmatic thinking towards embracing neoteric stores and segmented return of intrinsic value— such being, above all, preventative for a monument bubble in the financial markets; or also in what is not the most volatility-user-friendly of speculative industries/development. $MESH will provide the means to secure physical holding in this very assortment of temporal positions taken by non-digital assets/business consortia, similar to an individual corporation’s purchasable stake in their actual clients or original ideas– though, now offering decentralized commonplace to bargain against debt (if not default rate accounting) and/or spacial delineation, just as municipal regions often might. Where evidently, having consistent or diverse usability and diplomatic efficiency are the highest priorities when innovating a global network of payments over typical broadband infrastructure; seeing your diachronic versus anachronistic debates and shills (e.g. a #goldisking surrounded by #tulipfrenzy, trend war) are derivatively solved thanks to appealing for the expanding fairness between project implementation, supply interests, and autocratic investment. In this particular case, participation is not a matter of leveraged insurance within the general policy of ‘risking’ but rather our supplementation to an environment’s authenticity.

The founder of Litecoin told potential buyers Monday night that buying his currency is "extremely risky" and that he expects to have a multi-year bear market where its value could drop 90%.

Institutional improvements are not simply a prowess in global ecology (a benchmark of inducible control) but are more so designed for social academy– having been our only education through terrestrial change. If we must acquire what is the metadata and arbitrary variations of our presumed symbiosis with infinitesimal analogs, how can our leaders (through a somewhat favorable, “shapeshifting”), learn about this encompassing power of human relationships outside of such geophysical terms? So, while tweaking my portfolio’s seasonality for the upcoming holiday sesh (usually beginning with the satanic paganism of All Hallow’s Eve), I had to assume at least some, if not one of the hot items offered during the retail boom will be formatted for all walks of life– comprehensively designed like the great inventions of our time (i.e. usable electricity, the internet, sustainable growth regulators, etc) and get this... totally on sale right now on Amazon! Somehow in my research, nuclear warfare didn’t fit into the equation of universal benefits; and while aerospace and defense do go hand in hand there is something about massively incredible technology which offsets any advancements per capita or morally, for that matter. Exploration of these anthropological unknowns is seemingly the counterweight to defining what we do know about people, because it’s always particularly sensible when we understand the bottom line in nature, together. Am I expecting ‘Quantum Dot’ solar panels everywhere imaginable, ‘CRISPR’ to a medical heart’s content, and the ‘FOLED’ iPhone from Santa? No, as typically to expect a breakthrough of science with overwhelming potential (e.g. increased naturalist appeal) is the waning effect of time– unfulfilled by the quite apparent realities of our generational deficits, and supplemented by only the activism towards broad implementation. Yet, I had to think how real estate was just another industry keen on over embellishments; when the only reason keeping Trump from living at his Pennsylvania Avenue hotel (aside from a POTUS’ etiquette) is probably the nudge up in historical property value. And, what really came first: the retrofitting or the community development?     

meanwhile, in Russia…

The antiphrastical tone of Wall Street has almost guaranteed the forthcoming of a great suspension for supply and demand. Today, the value driving inverse and all of its peripherals have been causing consumers to create a semblance under informative duress and ironic scrutiny. A most exalted form to our public, or those looking to categorically flourish, is having seen a preference for fable above reality. Almost as though we cannot retain our livelihoods for the sake of an imaginary pool of wants, this earth has come to agree on income disparity as ‘supplemental’ and ‘ephemeral’ only as a limitation in itself. And although the phantasms of piracy and rebellion from modern classism alike– seem to fade out with ‘buzzed up’ generations, it is the absence of self-sustaining pessimism that actually perpetuates further doubt amongst them. Innovation in science or even finance has cast a shadow on governments promising global power to the first country with ‘entropical supremacy in digital currency or artificial intelligence’ (e.g., Bitcoin, Intel, and Tesla), just as our greenback was inflated by a theoretical stability of tender and as cold wars have been around since before humankind’s boundary-less space race. Where is the line, in point of fact, drawn between municipal goals and profiteering? 

‘(e.g., Bitcoin, Intel, and Tesla)’

Future scenarios of reversing humanity into ‘being accountable’ hold altruism and invulnerability in their highest prospects. As a people, we’ve come to understand how to replicate a certain functionality of the lost worlds and yet, have failed to maintain dialogue in how final decisions are made towards rigid change. I am not directly speaking about micro-aggression although what makes sense is considering the search for revival in the way we live our lives always surrounding others, in this case to guarantee privacy and self-preservation. Advancement of society is delayed in many ways through unitary norms and in most cases the materials to create this saving grace are akin to ‘cash flow versus expenditures’ in economics. Are we devoid of illuminating singularities of capitalization aside raw populism? Has every generation before us and to follow, let go of an opportunity to share in resources (minus library realpolitik) through an archetype for the rights of passage in leadership?

Solipsistic pressure can be defined as the legitimate wanting to be alone, in particular not from catalysts of anxiety. In this meditation (unfoundedly deepening) our minds devote the proper attention to objective resonance and does so at its own speed. Think of a phenotype as it discovers the environment and yet contains an observational barring in flux–– as ontological partiality at total rest. What makes for good emotional intelligence (evolutionarily speaking) is a strong listening ability. This means it is knowing when to step in and take charge–– or waiting for the best possible moment, and somehow feeling such responsibility also exists perpetually in every other human! Even as time continues and more people are in need of your progressed skills of oneness, there will always be a moment somewhere, if not completely metaphysically, to break it all down. Surely, if reality demands any is unharmed just as much as another, this planet proves it is not a duality of personal satisfaction or is at all, violent. Yet, seeking characteristic wisdom in place of obsequent leverage, still may be the right cure for ill-founded cliques, or the popular kids and politicians alike who are blatant victims of the echo chamber.

Humans were all but translating thought into nature surrounding them; it at least implied a peak for digitalised revolution. Entire houses, workplaces, and transportation methods– everything on or off the grid totally is converted into the cliché oversimplified neogasm to be expected much before the 22nd century began and in lieu of miniaturization or high-productivity trends. Life was the polarizing whitespace that would allow us to live more comfortably with marginal overpopulation and resource depletion (like nothing we’d ever see in our fawning experience, somehow this concept did persist yet only rhetorically and undeveloped, till today– from having been mysteriously sensible). Time passed through the democratic process as though being continually rebuilt to become even better, more energy efficient and in its mammoth intensity– just couldn’t sink beneath the tumultuous waves of a progressive socialist endgame. At each turn, subsequent majorities were abandoning a significant portion of aggregation models (if not evident relics of days past being outright– ‘government to government’ incentivized silk roads, without genuine opportunistic liberties) having involved the dirtying of what was ‘justifiably procured’ domanial freedoms left exposed to antagonistic world market contextualization and influence. They soon found what would become an unquestioned basis for econo-mechanics until the end of time!   

Finally, the landmass of the earth was unified with technology in ways that would allow for their coexistence, yet while generations of humankind passed on the faith necessary to have in such a locality– was this seemingly indestructible and quite real discipline ill-fated amidst weary consensus?  

Propaganda becomes an irreplaceable source for transparency solutions because of its purpose in the enervating of vastly changing ideas amongst a varying populace (starving them to confusion), or more cryptically, discussed in blind preparation for secret societies or deep states empowered by elusive premises of conflict– well within the gaze of humiliatingly adhering to non-transparency in both spoken language and militaristic action. We questioned further... Could an integral member of upstanding citizenship empirically beget their connection to an endowed psychological underworld: a sub-civilization and emergence modifier– originally never wanting to have formed– and out of the dawn of open surveillance cultures and the blockchain’s trustless electorate? Such a modification (essentially to human livelihood), would suggest precisely what those embryonic technologies are capable of, in terms of how information is gathered to secure and certify a finite way of life! Therefore, these digital meta-collections of thoughts permeating our existence, if at all false, to what is a point of fact in denoting our bodily contribution while striving to become ‘good,’ and what is against the already drained souls desiring of easily sought truths... 

should be railed as the provenance of opacity in itself!

Clearly, the testaments of moral noesis (used here qua environmental rather than genetic selection) are not enlightened of a free market's direct archetypal process, even if let’s say, abstractions of those experientially knowledgeable of capitalism were motivated by increasing biologically neutral interaction (e.g. by a comprehensive statistical welfare survey) while positively suggesting their global rights to a complimentary foundation for textbook eco-governance. There is hardly reason for these grandiose visions to ever know of a possible detrimental reality on the cusp of earth’s hurried sense of competition with pragmatic industries. Whereas in our imperfect universe, do the cards of spacial and attributive inheritance always play out as ambiguously so– if the only condition to establish this equality of opportunity, is us zeroing in anthropomorphically on all what accounts for currencies, non-monetary wealth, and the academic phenomena of everything which potentially surrounds us? Meaning, if the human origin we’ve informatically come to understand is flawed somehow, is it still a disposition of man to ‘just observe’ by any means, even if subconsciously a quantum, and leverage all on the basis of a newly defined habitability and partial understanding, albeit unnaturally menacing? What grew into a dissenting network of wrongfully affected persons, also ensured success with the ‘clouded maverick’ role given what leading-edge resources were at their range for counterintuitive armaments.  

‘The reinforcement of omnipresence ecologically–– meets the statistical efforts toward lawful expansion’

Well, this is the story of such a universe acting imperfectly and subsequently, pleasant or solace– what is a ‘history’ in response. More importantly, to temporally environ that great achievement as though we couldn’t happily move on from the idea of friendship beyond the family (in regards to transparent ethics), our plot should remain only as a myth. Is it actually required to eventually concede to a rise, in the insular traditions who’ll specifically build upon a primordial device, and in the victim reversing norms of survival this world has almost come to be established under– or shall we, using similar falsehoods, rapidly change stance to our fellow man in order to press on with him through mutual disassociation? Now, there is a human public at the crux of political statement without a categorical concept of opinion– a concept guiding the relation to nature’s science of ‘being oneself’ amidst the other– acting justly from the will rather than continually justifying it with progress.    

‘How is this is a dialogue for growth?’ You may ask. An inhabitancy learning to understand each other on the basis of who they are not; whilst searching for a substitute in their replicable absorption and tenable disposition– an absolute best for public service– indeed, all that was previously fought for yet, seldom desired in an era when final and modern results (utopian-like accountability less reflective demur) might not be seen in any but the last atmospheric stage. Maybe the paradoxical eve of collision with universal dignity would light such hearts; that is if the quantization of this land’s ‘rebirth’ legislated a transitive analysis between distributed enforcement and, autonomy in general, through the democratized self. The cybertext of whichever hidden societies (à la dark mesh webs or cryptocurrencies), in particular being far above or below ‘well-performing’ fair value, wouldn’t attenuate the logic of how necessary augmentation entities were acquired, however, it would be a personal risk in not having the highest material consciousness (out of legal and spiritual foundation) causing a decided flux in our rational space: an overall class of validity.

Nevertheless, an element of openness is true, not crucial for the case of society as such, without a fundamental directive in proving itself ‘towards existence’ by the deal-making of product utility, yet with the guise of leadership to massively forward infrastructure goals that outweigh the advanced scale of literally, robotic assumptions. Apparently, because the next triumph in the scientific process, by discerning the consequence of propaganda or fabricated truths as a cross-culturally effective curriculum wired to our every day, is to overwhelmingly support biological confidence sampling, which measures non-inherited semantic endurance of evolutionary optimism and phenomenological synchronicity (i.e. an exercise of paradigm socio-applied context)– unlinked to widespread relational imagery aesthetics or computational nomocratic form projection. 

~ After going completely wireless, we ‘philosophically abandoned’ this technology only to strengthen our roots in what was done before we had something do it for us. ~ 

To be continued...