Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?
Hey! For our final blog post, we were asked to write about our personal ethic as we develop as nature interpreters.
Iâm currently in my final year of university, and Iâm beginning to look for jobs. And for the first time in my life, Iâm looking for career jobs, instead of part-time of summer positions. So needless to say Iâve been doing a lot of thinking about what jobs I ideally want, what jobs Iâm willing to do, and what jobs Iâm not willing to do. Our course readings for this week mentioned a fear of a desk job being a potential motivating factor for pursuing a career related to environmental interpretation. That one did admittedly resonate with me a bit. My last job was more or less of a desk job, where I worked as a research assistant in a lab. And even though, on paper, it was closer to what I want to do as a career, I didnât enjoy it very much. I missed working in the service industry, I missed the high-energy, social atmosphere, I missed getting to work with my hands and see the results right in front of me. Spending most of my working hours not only indoors, but in a dim lab staring at a laptop just made me irritable. So Iâd love to find a job in the sciences thatâs more hands-on and active, but Iâve realized Iâd happily move away from research if I canât find a job in that field that lets me move around.
Every week or so I get an email from the university describing job opportunities. It hasnât been very useful in finding jobs, but it sure has been useful in helping me figure out exactly what place/companies/fields I am not willing to work for. Thereâs always plenty of decently paying opportunities working for mega-corporations like PepsiCo, and the like, as well as their countless subsidiaries. I know now that I wouldnât be able to live with myself if I worked for a place like that. I would much rather go just about anywhere else, including back to the service industry. I might have a less prestigious career, but I care about having a job that I enjoy doing and that I see as important. During my last job, it was difficult to get up and go to the lab in the morning when I couldnât really see the effects and importance of the research that was being done. I know that whatever I end up doing, it needs to be relatively active, and even better if I get to spend time outdoors as part of it. As long as Iâm still able to spend my free time outside, that much is negotiable.
I wanted to go into more details about my beliefs/motivations/self-assigned responsibilities. First, the rather apparent role of nature in mental health and our current culture around it. Not that I have enough space to go into all of my thoughts on that, but Iâd like to include a few of them here. One, on mental health being treated like an individual problem, when it really should be recognized as a systemic one. Even if people admit that itâs systemic, the âsolutionsâ and treatments that are currently popular tend to be highly individual. Take mood-regulating medication, go to eternal therapy, isolate yourself from others in the name of self-improvement. In general, mental health has been both commercialized and capitalized upon. Like I mentioned, I donât have the adequate space to go through my thoughts on the systemic causes of mental lack-of-wellness. But as Iâm sure many of us are aware, spending time outside and spending time with other people (or even both at the same time!) have been shown time and time again to be beneficial to human well-being. Honestly, I donât think we need more research in that area. We already know, and as much as I like numbers, more statistics arenât going to save us.
So for me personally, all that means that I donât want to have a job that drags down the health of other people, or my own. I would love to have a job that helps remove some of the barriers that have been put up between nature and people, which I donât think should belong in different categories in the first place. But an important caveat for me is that I donât want my career to be a constant fight. Iâm quite tired of war analogies. Thereâs less of a point in destroying something if thereâs nothing better to work towards. I donât want to dedicate my life to fighting climate change, because Iâll make myself miserable and make everyone around me a little less happy. Thatâs not to say I donât care, but I do think that a bunch of sad and lonely people arenât going to bring about much positive change. Like the video with David Suzuki and Richard Louv mentioned (I think it was Richard Louv who mentioned it), itâs hard to make change if people donât have any sort of positive idea of a future to look forwards to.
So to summarize as neatly as I can: If I end up doing something related to nature interpretation, I want it to get people excited and help people feel more connected to the world around them.
Picture: One of the Arboretum gardens after a snowstorm
On the same note as working towards something rather than solely working against, I have a book recommendation for anyone looking for a sci-fi story with a positive outlook: Monk and Robot by Becky Chambers (and its sequel)