Recently rewatched Troy (2004). Good movie, horrible adaptation but anyways, here are the Sakamaki brothers as characters in the Illiad/ Odyssey. Might do the Muakamkis later. Enjoy!
Shu and Odysseus share the exhaustion of men who have seen too much. Both are intelligent in a quiet, almost reluctant way. Less about action and more about observation. They rarely move impulsively and, instead, they read situations and respond only when necessary, as if every gesture carries weight that should not be wasted.
Odysseus is a man defined by distance, wandering for years not only across the sea, but away from the life he once had. Shaped by memory more than presence.
Shu carries the same quiet disconnection, constantly in between as if everything around him is slightly out of reach.
He does not chase life so much as drift through what remains of it.
Reiji Sakamakai as Agamemnon
Stiff af. Reiji and Agamemnon are both defined by leadership, whose authority is built on order and sacrifice. They are disciplined, calculated, and unwavering.
Agamemnon, as a king, leads by command, not inspiration. His decisions hold the Greek army together even as they fracture their trust.
Reiji carries that same need for control. He does not lead through emotion, but through systems, rules, and restraint, always remaining emotionally distant.
It's almost as if closeness itself would compromise the system he relies on.
Ayato Sakamaki as Diomedes
Was debating on him for a while but I can't find anyone more fitting for Ayato than Diomedes. Pure energy, direct, aggressive, and unrelenting when provoked. Diomedes is one of the few mortals in The Iliad who wounds even gods, not through strategy, but through sheer force and momentum.
Ayato carries that same intensity. He doesn’t hesitate, doesn’t overthink, and rarely stops once he commits. His sense of identity is tied to impact. If he is not dominating the moment, he feels displaced within it.
Kanato Sakamaki as Cassandra
My lord, he's always been the most complicated character for me to understand, but he reminds me a lot of Cassandra.
Cassandra is so deeply misunderstood. She sees things clearly, speaks clearly, and still ends up unheard.
Kanato is just the same. What he feels is intense and very real, but it doesn’t translate cleanly to others. His emotions are there, but they often come out distorted and just wrong.
It’s not that he doesn’t express himself. It’s that what he expresses never quite arrives the way he means it to.
You'd think of Paris, wouldn't you? So did I, but Laito and Hermes are so much more alike. They are quick, perceptive, and socially intelligent in ways that make them difficult to pin down.
Hermes isn't bound to anything. He crosses boundaries, slips between roles and always move with ease.
Laito carries that same kind of ease. He doesn't engage with interaction as something stable, but as something shifting and performative, where tone and intention can change depending on the moment. He reads people easily, and just as easily adjusts himself within those dynamics.
Ajax, a warrior of overwhelming strength, pride, and a sense of honor that cannot, for the life of him, survive humiliation.
In the Iliad, he stands as one of the greatest fighters after Achilles, yet his downfall comes not from weakness, but from the collapse of his sense of worth when that honor is questioned.
Subaru carries the same kind of intensity. His strength is not in doubt, but it is emotionally uncontained. When it has nowhere to go, it turns inward and, like Ajax, what remains is pressure that cannot be processed in a stable way.