What happened with Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist?
Normally, I'd just make a review of the show. Maybe a long one, if I had a lot to praise or a lot to complain about, but just a review nonetheless. However, this one is different.
At his own birthday event, Mark Pakin adressed his feelings regarding the lackluster response to Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist, and Ohm Thipakorn was quick to make a similar statement on twitter.
I have never, in my life, seen actors adress the failure of their show while the show was still airing. Not even outside of Thai BLs, and certainly never in that industry. When a show underperforms, the actors usually all still talk about what they liked about the show, their characters, how hard they worked, and all that, to maintain a positive attitude, even if the fans and viewers are being critical. Mark and Ohm doing this, talking about their show failing, is unprecedented. It says a lot about just how badly the show failed, I think.
It's also sparked a lot of speculation about why it failed. People had been talking about it for a few weeks already, with the show's quality dwindling as the episodes went on, and as a result, people started losing interest and started sharing what the issues were that made them drop the show.
And I want to ponder the same. What did go wrong here? Why is the show so bad? Because it is bad. Mark and Ohm know that people overwhelmingly think it's bad. But what exactly went wrong?
My guess? A lot of things. Some of them big, some of them small, but a lot of things nonetheless. Let's go through them.
I would say the actors carry the least of the blame for this. The actors have some control of the product, but a lot of it is out of their hands. They don't get to decide very much of the script, even less of the plot, and their input on the direction depends entirely on both the actor and the director. Whatever happened, it can hardly be their fault.
This show has good actors. Poon is a bit of a weirdo, but he's funny, with good comedic timing, and he's good at playing the kind of role he's given here. It's Jimmy's debut in a purely comedic role, but he's talented and does pretty well here. I've only seen Ohm in A Boss and A Babe, but I loved him in that (finding out that he was Mark's partner was a big part of why I decided to give this show a chance), and I've been told his acting in Kidnap was superb. Mark is an acting powerhouse, who has done brilliantly with both dramatic and comedic roles. I'm a big believer in comedy being more difficult than drama, and his performance as Tiw in My School President was absolutely brilliant, and cemented him as an actor with excellent comedic timing and understanding.
So why does Mark seem a little wooden in this? Jay should be right up his alley. And he's doing fine, but something feels off, when compared to the other roles I've seen him in. Ohm is the same. He's doing fine, but he's not shining in this role. The same goes for Jimmy and Poon.
The only actor who seems to be performing to their usual high standard is View, honestly. And Khaotung, but he's barely in this.
Of course, it's possible that the actors had trouble getting fully into the show they were making, or that their interpretations of the characters or the vibes were off. Maybe they had less time to prepare for the roles. If they struggled to accept the directions they were given, it may come off as wooden and off-kilter.
But all of them? At the same time?
A slew of good actors underperforming makes me think that it's not really their fault. It must be elsewhere. The scripting or directing, maybe, or a lack of time given to workshopping and getting a feel for their characters. Which brings me to my first genuine guess as to what went wrong.
It's funny. No one wants to mention this as a possibility. People have blamed GMMTV, the sponsors, the scheduling, they've said the problem is just that there's no popular pairing to make people gloss over a bad script, but no one has pointed to the director maybe being part of the problem. If this was directed by New, you bet your ass people would be pointing fingers at him. I guess people really love this director's other works.
I haven't seen any of Pepzi's shows prior to this, but she's been both assistant director and director on some very good, highly praised shows. Her assistant director credits include Bad Buddy and Dark Blue Kiss, both of which were excellent, and as a director, she's probably most famous for KinnPorsche and My Stand-In.
I'm not going to say she's a bad director just because of this one show. She's generally very praised and her shows have had a lot of popularity. There probably is a reason no one has questioned the quality of the directing, and I simply don't know enough to call her bad. It doesn't sound like she's usually bad.
But I feel like it's worth pointing out that her two big shows, KinnPorsche and My Stand-In, are both plot-heavy and sex-heavy shows, which means fans will have been less likely to comment on messy, disjointed plots and scenes. I have heard a few people talk about both shows being messy. But with the kinds of plot they have, it's also possible that it was supposed to be messy, so not only are people less likely to point it out, they're also more likely to think it's on purpose.
I know it's happened before, that people overlook or brush away directorial issues because the plot is good. The Eclipse is generally lauded as a fantastic show, but that definitely has storytelling issues. Have Pepzi's shows had the same advantage? Maybe.
Again, I can't personally say whether Pepzi is good or bad. What I can say is that she may not have been a good match for this particular show.
Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist is a fluffy, silly romcom. It's practically the opposite of both KinnPorsche and My Stand-In.
With both KinnPorsche and My Stand-In, Pepzi worked with complex, meaty stories. There were mysteries to unravel and the characters could be morally gray. Sex was also a recurring feature on these shows
(And I want to make it clear that I don't think that's a bad thing. Sex in shows is not a bad thing. I don't even think the sex scenes have to be poignant or plot important to be a good inclusion. Sometimes a sex scene can just be there to show that this couple is really into each other. Also, there's nothing wrong with the viewers finding it hot).
Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist does not have a complex, meaty plot, and it has no sex scenes. Sure, Jay and Sant kiss, and we know they've had sex, but this is definitely an innocent show. The only exception is a sensual makeout scene, that's definitely leading to sex, in the very last episode. And hey, that's also totally fine! I'm just saying there are fewer sex scenes in this show than in Pepzi's other shows.
Telling the kind of story that Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist is, might simply not be one of Pepzi's strengths. She might struggle with a plot that stays pretty much surface-level, with very few deep revelations, that focuses mostly on simple character interactions and relationship development. She might struggle to portray a developing relationship when she's not allowed to use sex very much to do so. Not just because she's not allowed to have Mark and Ohm simulate sex on camera, but there's not much acknowledgement of them having a sex life at all, in any way (even though it's a normal part of a relationship, which is why Jojo uses it so much in his shows).
She wouldn't be the only one to struggle with that. New has shown that he has issues portraying established relationships and domestic couples in his shows.
So it's definitely possible that this genre, with these restrictions - an innocent, silly romcom - is just simply not Pepzi's strength. She may not be able to direct or edit Mark's comedic timing just right, or she may not have known just how to use Ohm's dramatic flair and sass optimally. She may struggle with filling out the time when she's not allowed to put in sex scenes.
It feels mean to write, but I genuinely think it might be a possibility.
It's also possible that she's not that strong as a director in general, and that it's harder for her to compensate for that when she doesn't have a good source material to work with. Again, she wouldn't be the only one. New has that issue. But also again, I can't say whether or not she's a good director, so this is just a theoretical possibility.
One that leads me to my next point.
No doubt, there are issues here. This is a JittiRain story, and JittiRain is sort of infamous for writing mediocre stories. They're the author behind both Perfect 10 Liners and We Are, both of which are in a very similar style to Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist.
JittiRain also wrote Be My Favorite, which is an excellent show. Among those who watched it, it's generally considered very good, very high quality. The story in and of itself is quite complex. There are some pretty deep character arcs, and it's one of very few modern BL stories that actually delves into things like homophobia, both external and internal. And there's time travel!
But that's not what most of JittiRain's stories seems to be like. Most of them are, instead, like We Are, Perfect 10 Liners, and Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist. And with the latter, a lot of the usual JittiRain issues are front and center.
The plot stays at a surface level. There's very little in terms of a story that isn't about Jay and Sant's developing relationship. Which is fine! But their characters and their relationship are pretty surface-level too. Neither has a whole lot of personality. Jay is weird, Sant likes sweets, and that's about it.
In other shows, not having more character details isn't a big deal, but in this show, it just doesn't quite work, even with Mark and Ohm putting their all into portraying their characters.
Another JittiRain issue is the random trauma that was included. It's happened in other shows based on their works, like Perfect 10 Liners, and it doesn't really do the story here any favors. I can't say whether these traumas work better in the original novel, but in the show, they don't.
Jay's brother dying on his birthday is not a bad story. Jay wanting to be like his brother, as if he's trying to keep him alive that way, or trying to honor him, has the potential to be very interesting. Maybe this is why Jay is sort of weird and wooden. He's behaving not like himself, but like Jeng, and that doesn't come off as natural. But that doesn't seemt to really be the case. The only thing that seems to be about is that this is the reason Jay is studying to be a denstis. This story got also shoved to the end of the show, with so little build-up, that a lot of viewers most likely forgot that Jeng was even a mystery. His name is seen on Jay's dentist kit in episode 1, but then he's not even brought up again until episode 9. If they'd given it more build-up, more momentum, it could have worked even better than it does, because this particular storyline does actually work. Somewhat, at least.
What doesn't work is Sant's trauma. There are even two reasons why it doesn't work. The first is that there's no need to create extra drama to have him be dramatically scared of going to the dentist. Plenty of people hate that, and get scared and nervous. Jay can still gently guide Sant through his dentist fears without the added detail that his mother abandoned him while he was at the dentist.
Which, by the way, makes no sense. Why did she take him there, promise to be there, and then leave as soon as he was in the chair? Who paid for his appointment? Who took him home? Did the dentist have to awkwardly call his grandparents when they realized that his mother was no longer in the building?
The second reason this story doesn't work is that the resolution of it is Sant forgiving his mother. And part of why this is a problem isn't even this particular show's fault. People were mad that the brothers in Perfect 10 Liners forgave their mother for the damage she caused them, and so Sant forgiving his mother for abandoning him had peopel throwing up their hands at why these crappy parents always need to be forgiven. It's possible that Sant's story would have been slightly less unpopular if Perfect 10 Liners hadn't just done the same thing.
But that is an example of what can be wrong with JittiRain's stories. These parental traumas that are fairly easily forgiven are something of a recurring theme, and people don't like it. It makes people mad. Paired with a story that in general is pretty weak, having Sant forgive his mother fairly easily is not just angering, but also frustrating. With so little plot otherwise, if they were going to include trauma, they maybe should have made it take up more plot and more time.
By this I mean plot and pacing. And after going through a lot of the issues with the plot in the previous section, this will be pretty short, but I want to touch on this as a show thing, rather than a source material thing.
A problem with the plot is that quite a few things happen, but none of them are given much time or really delved into. Not just the trauma thing, but other things as well. Sant's root canal was something I expected would take up a lot more time than it did. They dragged it out so it took him two episodes to agree to let Jay do the work, and then the actual work took no time at all. And yes, it's not like the details of a root canal would be all that interesting, but I was expecting there to be just a little bit more to it.
Similiarly, Sant's financial issues go nowhere. They popped up one episode and disappeared the next, with very little time dedicated to it.
Then there were plot points that seemed to make no sense at all. Sant panics when he's told his nephew will come to stay with him, because he's told his family that he's doing better than he is, and so he begs Jay to let him use his dorm for the duration of the visit. Only, when they celebrate the nephew getting into a Bangkok school, they celebrate in Sant's actual room, and we never see Sant or the nephew use Jay's room. So what was the point of that? Did they just not have any other ideas for how to bring these two together again, or to point out that San is relatively poor?
Gugg and Yada's story has been heavily criticized from the beginning. Yada having a girlfriend, whom she then breaks up with, seemingly to open up a path for her and Gugg to date, was not a good call. While it's good bisexual representation to show someone dating people of either gender, choosing the girl to be the one breaking off a same-sex relationship was not the way to go. There's so little GL content, it very quickly ends up seeming like GMMTV is still shying away from it too much. It would have been better if Gugg had been the one dating a man and breaking up with him to open up the path for him and Yada.
Except that's not even what happens. Yada gets back together with her girlfriend, leaving people wondering what exactly the point was of having them break up in the first place. Like with Sant's nephew's stay, it's a plot point that seems entirely random and has literally no impact on anything. Except maybe teaching Gugg that he can't always get what he wants.
And all of this is impacted by the pacing, which is all over the place. Things go very, very fast, and then sometimes things are dragged out, and the combination of the two makes the whole thing feel off.
The source material may not have been stellar, but the adaptational choices did not make it any better.
A lot of people point the blame here. For various reasons, most of them boiling down to a claim that GMMTV half-assed this. One person made a detailed analysis of why GMMTV may have intended for this show to be a failure from the beginning. And that post has a lot of good points, but I want to point out something as well: why would any company purposely create something bad? There is no way GMMTV set out to have this show fail. Did they aim for it to be a huge success? Maybe not. But a failure? Absolutely not. GMMTV never wants any of their shows to be a failure, no matter what. They want them all to make money, after all.
Now, did they intend for this to be a more mediocre show, with middling success, that could help make money and fuel interests for other projects? That is entirely possible.
On paper, this is exactly the kind of show that GMMTV can churn out with very little effort. It's a university BL with a simple romance story and a small cast. Not a lot of sets, costumes or special effects were needed. GMMTV makes shows like this all the time, and they can be the bread and butter that helps fund bigger, more complex shows and endeavors. My Golden Blood, for instance, will have required more spending just for props, special effects, and work hours in post-production. That Summer takes place on an island, so they'll have needed to spend a lot of money to shoot on location and house cast and crew for the duration. Shows like Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist can help fund that.
Some have said that part of this show's unpopularity comes from not having an established, popular couple to help pull in viewers and make them overlook issues (people who say this are usually the same who think shows like We Are are bad and/or boring), but I have a counter to that as well. No, it doesn't have popular couple, but it does have one of the most overall popular actors in his first lead role: Mark Pakin.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that GMMTV didn't bother to include a lot of popular actors or a great plot because they assumed Mark's popularity and hype alone would bring in the viewing numbers and content engagement. And hey, Mark probably is the reason why a lot of people seemed to start this show, because there's not much else, really, to draw people in. The plot is basic and the cast is small. There's no side couple, no large friend groups, and actors like Jimmy, View and Khaotung have very minor roles. Khaotung is basically just a two-episode cameo! Which is fine and normal, but noticeable when the cast is so small.
Mark was most likely meant to be the drawing factor. Unfortunately, even if he did manage to draw in a lot of viewers at first, the rest made a good portion of them leave.
But no, GMMTV is not the big bad that set out to create a terrible product, that Mark and Ohm, and all the others, had to suffer through to earn money for others. GMMTV made yet another version of a type of show they've done a lot, and this version, unfortunately, did not turn out so good.
Did anything else play into it?
This one might seem random, but people have suggested that they maybe had to remove an episode from the show because of the big earthquake earlier this year. It meant that all shows were off air for a week, but GMMTV had already made all the preparations for a Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist finale party on a specific date, and if they wanted to stick to that, they had to cut an episode. And I can actually see them having done that. In the final episode, there's a montage explaining how Jay and Sant decided to move out of Bangkok after graduation, and it's not entirely unlikely that this storyline was originally meant to take up more time. But then the earthquake happened.
International differences
I'm most certainly not an expert on Thai culture or Thai audience preferences, but I do feel like I've heard and noticed that Thai fans and international fans don't always like the same things. It's possible that some of the backlash to this show is because international audiences don't like a lot about it. For instance, I feel like I've generally seen more international audiences say that university bls are boring, whereas Thai audiences seem to like that. There's also sometimes talk of a specific type of Thai comedy, that not all international audiences fully understand or think is very funny.
Now, Mark talking about the failure of this show at his birthday event tells me that the Thai audience also wasn't too pleased with the show, so the international audience being hard to please sometimes was definitely not a huge factor, but it may have been a factor.
CONCLUSION: What happened with Sweet Tooth, Good Dentist?
Obviously, I can't say with 100% certainty and accuracy that this is what went wrong. I think all the things I've mentioned might have played a part, and I'm sure there are other possibilities I haven't even considered.
But with that being said, I think this is what I would point to as being the biggest, most defining issues: the source material and especially the director.
JittiRain is infamous for these mediocre stories, but plenty of them have been popular in the past. This might very well have been one of their weaker stories, and the adaption did not make up for it.
And listen. I know Pepzi has made very popular shows. I know that. But usually when a show is considered bad, the director gets a good chunk of the blame, if not all of it. And regardless of whether this simply wasn't her strong suit, if it was a fluke, or if she's secretly not a very good director, I don't know. All I know is she had the most power over this show, and so most of the responsibility for why it failed falls to her. The same way New gets the blame for things that go wrong in his shows. Pepzi simply wasn't capable of creating a good, silly romcom with the source material and the actors she was given.
That's what I think went wrong.