"Treasure," β featuring AndrΓ© 3000 for the Summer 2002 issue of KING Magazine. Photography by Michael Blackwell and text by Patricia DeLuca.
Game of Thrones Daily

Discoholic πͺ©

Kiana Khansmith

dirt enthusiast

RMH
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
h

oozey mess
hello vonnie

Janaina Medeiros
DEAR READER

pixel skylines

titsay
tumblr dot com

Product Placement

seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@coarsesalt
"Treasure," β featuring AndrΓ© 3000 for the Summer 2002 issue of KING Magazine. Photography by Michael Blackwell and text by Patricia DeLuca.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
important stuff
January 28th, 2012
Rosamund Pike at Die Another Day premier (2002)
edmond kiraz

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
I've been bit at least 25 times since my trip began
everyones got that one neurosis they cant even complain about on tumblr
It'd be nice if the "sex positivity" was about like...women demanding orgasms and pleasurable sex with their partners with the threat of kicking them to the curb if the don't deliver. Instead it shames women to accept whatever kink their partner has in the name of being "open-minded" and that they shouldn't prioritize having an orgasm anyway because "sex isn't all about orgasms". A woman wanting to have "vanilla" sex with her partner and still climax is viewed as boring. Like, if your male partner consistently gets off each time and you never do, why would you stay with that person if you're "sex positive"? Sure seems unfair to the woman in that situation, almost like it's just another way to get women to do only what men want in bed π€.
This is specifically about that post that's been circulating radblr about the woman who broke her neck getting her hair pulled. She described their relationship sensually, called his penis a goddamn treasure, and then concluded the post saying he never made her cum once. So she was letting a man roughhouse her body for no pleasure in return and nobody seems to find that weird. Why was she with him at all? Why is her only comment on this situation to pull hair "safely"? He was hurting her and she admitted that she didn't even enjoy sex with him and nobody cares because they're "sex-positive". The sex positivity movement is fucking cancer.
I'm bringing this back because it still pisses me off and I feel it's relevant. This is how she starts out talking about sex with this guy:
One part that I didn't include was how she talked about greeting him at the door and he pretty much instantly initiated sex. The whole story makes her sound like a MRA's dream girl: she greets him in her own home wearing high heels and stylish clothes and makeup, has sex with him immediately without complaint, lets him do whatever he wants to get off, and barely even complains about the grievous injury she receives at his hands or the fact that she didn't orgasm once during her entire relationship with him. She mentions that he never thought of her pleasure like it was an afterthought to her, an additional strike against him but not enough on its own to be brought up. And despite that, despite her being a "cool girl" who he apparently said was "marriage material", he still drops her like she's nothing to him the moment she was injured because he obviously couldn't be bothered.
Even to the very end of her story, she doesn't think he did anything wrong by pulling her hair like that nor does she denounce "rough sex". All she talks about is how to pull hair "safely". Like....this is fucked up. How could you read this and not see that man as anything but a self-obsessed, misogynistic, abusive asshole despite all her attempts to paint him to the contrary? He literally fucked her when he felt like it, broke her neck, then left like it was none of his business.
This is what porn culture does to women: it makes them rationalize their own abuse because they and everyone around them continually justify it as normal and any serious incidents that occur because of "rough sex"/BDSM/etc are waved off as "dumb, badly-executed moves". This isn't healthy, you shouldn't wave off this kind of shit as just a mistake. I doubt this man was unaware of the amount of force he was pulling her hair with. Acting like it was completely unintentional is disingenuous. If it was really a mistake, if this dude had felt any remorse for what he did, he wouldn't have left her immediately after. This was a man who used a woman and then threw her away and he should be villified for that.
we need more pathetic female characters written by authors who don't hate women
to be clear since this is making the rounds: she has to be an absolute loser in no way that can be pinned on her gender. no "i'm just a girl tee-hee" stuff. straight up just a loser (nondenominational)
addendum: she must be the most important person in the whole narrative
I decided to sit down and concentrate and properly write the list of rules that qualify a character for this role.
FIRST LAW: This character must be a woman.
SECOND LAW: This character must be a loser, but not in a way that can be pinned on her gender. Misogynistic response from the audience does not disqualify the character.
THIRD LAW: If the audience does not enjoy this character, then it becomes impossible to enjoy the show/film/book/game altogether. It is not possible to ignore this character, for better or for worse.
FOURTH LAW: The character must make bad decisions, and not just be a victim of poor circumstances outside of her control. The character can also be a victim of poor circumstances outside of her control, but it has to be primarily her personal choices that deem her a loser.
Isn't it interesting how every single one of my friends' boyfriends/husbands has a rare untreatable combination of ADHD, anxiety, autism, and trauma which completely excuse and explain all of his shitty abusive behaviors while simultaneously justifying his refusal to do his own chores?? And isn't it fascinating that this pernicious epidemic of severe learning disabilities has completely escaped the purview of the medical profession, leaving speculative diagnosis entirely up to the careful conscientious examination of Dr. Girlfriend?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
banana republic spring 2000 campaign, published in vogue us, march 2000
via models.com 2002/2003
so much kink shit is just men trying to justify their desire to hurt women and pretend like they can go into a room, hurt someone, get off to hurting someone, and then walk out as if that doesnβt mean anything about who they are as a person

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
I like when you click a link and it turns purple its like youre bruising it