We stan

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic đŞŠ

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Product Placement
Claire Keane
taylor price
Keni

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Stonewall Inn

PR's Tumblrdome
Jules of Nature

Origami Around
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
official daine visual archive
noise dept.
trying on a metaphor

blake kathryn

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from France

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Netherlands
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Ecuador

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Ecuador
@casuallyobsessed
We stan

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Jesper Fahey from Six of Crows listens to seminal Canadian pop artist Carly Rae Jepsen.
Maybe itâs LIttleLostStarâs CRJ loving fic but when I saw this I immediately thought, âYes, I know.âÂ
The Church of Carly Rae Jepsen
Iâm a recent convert to the church of Carly Rae Jepsen.
I wish I had a good explanation for why itâs taken me this long, but I really donât. If youâre not a member of the CRJ congregation, you might know her best as âthe âCall Me Maybeâ girlâ. Thatâs the song that propelled her to notoriety in the States. I was in college at the time and, characteristically, the song was everywhere. I vividly remember a sign one of my roommates created for a party that said, âHey I just met you / and this is crazy / but I brought vodka / so party baby.â
I knew all the words to âCall Me Maybeâ but I couldnât have told you anything about CRJ or what the rest of her music might be. The song faded and Carly was summarily assigned One Hit Wonder status. Then, three years later, she had the audacity to put out her third album - âEMOTIONâ. Pop enthusiasts went wild.
I missed the call in then, and missed it again when âDedicatedâ came out in 2019. Â
Before I converted, most of what I knew about CRJ was that she was somehow both cult and mainstream. Everyone seemed to know about her, but she wasnât well known.
As it turns out, thatâs kind of the mythos of Carly. Sheâs known as a hitmaker who hasnât had any hits (at least not since âCall Me Maybeâ). To say that her fans think she deserves more recognition is practically a meme because no critic can seem to talk about her music without saying so.
It is interesting. CRJ makes music that is so purely pop - proclaimed as such by both critics and fans - so why hasnât she found more mainstream success?
Iâve started developing a theory, with the help of Olivia Rodrigo.
One of the things I love about âSourâ as an album is the concrete details incorporated into each song (and repeated through the tracks). Olivia tells us the story of the relationship, and how she feels now, through this materiality. A perfect example is âdeja vuâ, which opens with airy, mournful music, and the words, âCar ride to Malibu / strawberry ice cream / one spoon for two.â Itâs so incredibly specific that immediately youâre there in the moment with her. You donât have to have had that specific experience - she sets the scene for you with such detail that you can map your feelings to the moment.
This is very different from most of Carlyâs music. In reading critical responses to CRJ, what I saw again and again was people drawing an association between her music and âvagueness.â The implication is that thereâs a kind of emptiness. Not that the music is vapid, as pop music is sometimes described, but that thereâs an actual empty space. It stood out to me because at first I couldnât figure out what people were referring to. For me, CRJ songs are a direct hit of emotion - it feels laser targeted, not vague.
But in thinking about âSourâ, what I realized is that the âvaguenessâ being identified in Carlyâs music is probably related to the lack of materiality in the lyrics. Most CRJ songs are about relationships, but because there are rarely markers like strawberry ice cream in Malibu thereâs an indistinct quality when you try to distinguish one relationship from another. Any CRJ song could be about any relationship.
What I think is missing from that analysis is the fact that CRJ songs arenât really about her relationship to any particular person. Her songs are about how it feels to have feelings.
In âGimmie Loveâ (EMOTION, 2015), she sings, âI canât lie / I like the feeling how you make me shy.â She likes the feeling of being shy around the object of her affection. She goes on to sing, âgimmie love / gimmie touch / âcause I want what I want, do you think that I want too much?â Sheâs having the feeling of wanting - one level of experience - and sheâs also wondering (worrying?) how the other person feels about her wanting - another level of experience. In the song, CRJ isnât just in the moment - being shy, wanting love - sheâs watching herself in the moment.
Itâs this kind of self obsession that I love, because in a way that feels more real to me, more true, than the idea of some pure, grounded experience. Thereâs an element of, âI canât tell you what kind of ice cream we ate because I was too focus on observing my own feelings of being together eating ice cream.â
I think this might be one of the reasons CRJ hasnât found true mainstream success. If you go into her work looking for concrete detail, youâll end up unmoored and adrift. She includes elements of narrative and materiality, but theyâre not the focus in her body of work. People are used to pop music having tangible objects we can grab onto while we navigate intangible feelings. Those kinds of narrative elements makes us feel like weâre grounded in the specifics of one relationship, and then we fill in the corresponding emotions.
On the surface it might seem like CRJ songs are about how she felt about someone else, but on closer inspection the focus is almost always how she felt having the feelings. Thereâs a self consciousness to it. She isnât signing about another person - sheâs singing about herself.
I can see why other people might find that off putting, or feel like itâs a weakness in her work. But I like being plunged headfirst into an emotional experience. I want that pure rush, unadulterated by the problem of material reality. I worship at the altar of big feelings.
Take me to emotion, I want to go all the way
***
This was originally published in the Casually Obsessed email newsletter. If you like it, youâll probably like the rest of the newsletter too (in which case, you should subscribe!)Â
This episode is about the very bisexual book "Red, White and Royal Blue"! It was originally recorded for Chelsee's solo project, Casually Obsessed. It's a spoiler free discussion, so you can listen even if you haven't read the book!
In the episode we talk about:
⢠Avoiding things that are popular;
⢠Our theories on why straight women like content about gay men;
⢠Quintessential queer experiences;
⢠Why books like this matter (even when their covers are bubble gum pink);
⢠Writing about an identity other than your own;
⢠Author's we want to be friends with (and maybe date);
⢠Perfect nights with chosen families.
You can find the show notes for this episode at casuallyobsessedpodcast.com/red-white-and-royal-blue.
For a complete episode transcript, visit casuallyobsessedpodcast.com/red-white-and-royal-blue-transcript.
To sign up for The Bi Pod Bulletin, visit buttondown.email/TheBiPod
still working on my tarot magnum opus
So gorgeousÂ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
We're talking about our favorite biological identicals and the people who love, created, and try to murder them!
We're talking about our favorite biological identicals and the people who love, created, and try to murder them! Returning guest Julian Lejbman helps me dissect the BBC America sci-f thriller Orphan Black.
A few things we discuss in the episode are:
What we tell people who haven't seen Orphan Black before when we pitch the show to them
How Orphan Black transforms over time
Alison's existential crisis about being a clone
Factions within factions within factions (there were almost too many factions)
Who's your favorite clone?
Moral relativism and the doctors who practice it
Sarah Manning is bad at doing the right thing but she's really trying
What makes a maternal clone?
This episode is part 1 of a 2-part conversation. This first part is light on spoilers so it shouldn't ruin anything if you haven't seen the show or have only seen parts.
Show notes and more listening links live at casuallyobsessedpodcast.com/orphan-black
favorite sarah manning caps | for @markcampbells
Pretty much all my Paul & Sarah feelings are based on this moment. (As described in detail in prt 2 of our Orphan Black convo)