Brian Ross Criminal Defence Lawyer

The Ontario Court of Appeal says no. This case highlights why after-the-fact conduct evidence must be carefully assessed and tied to logical inferences rather than assumptions about guilt or intent. Contact us today to discuss your criminal law matter read more here

The McGowan-Morris decision shows how courts assess police conduct, individual rights, and public confidence in justice. Explore the ruling and understand its legal significance. Find out how this ruling could impact future vehicle searches read more here

Examine the Ontario Court of Appeal’s analysis in R. v. McDonald, including the flexibility of Browne v. Dunn, the importance of fairness, and the risks of overly restrictive jury instructions. Read more to better understand this significant criminal law decision read more here

R. v. Hussein, 2026 SCC 2 marks a major shift in Canadian criminal law. Learn how the Supreme Court narrowed the use of criminal records in Corbett applications while reinforcing fairness, social context analysis, and protections against prejudicial reasoning - read more here

What threshold must be met for an included offence to reach the jury? The “air of reality” test, clarified in R. v. Pan, ensures juries consider realistic alternative verdicts without judicial interference in credibility or inference. This ruling is a game-changer for defence strategy—learn how to apply it to secure fairer trials read more here

Delays in counsel access, unlawful arrests, or improper searches can lead to excluded evidence. This article explains how courts assess Charter breaches under section 24(2). Learn how justice is balanced and why legal remedies matter—read more here

This overview breaks down investigative detention, reasonable suspicion, and your rights to counsel and silence under the Charter. It also explains when courts may exclude evidence due to police misconduct. Explore your options and take action with confidence read more here

Are you aware of your rights if the police set you up for a crime? Canadian entrapment law outlines when police actions become unlawful. Find out how “bona fide inquiries” and “reasonable suspicion” affect your case. Get professional help now—speak to an experienced criminal defence lawyer for personalized legal advice read more here

Can post-offence conduct evidence lead to wrongful conclusions? Yes—unless judges carefully guide juries on how to interpret it. Learn how courts use this evidence to infer guilt only when justified. Read how fairness and reason shape the handling of after-the-fact conduct in trials read more here

When is expert testimony truly required in criminal trials? Judges apply strict rules to prevent unnecessary influence. See how necessity is assessed, why helpfulness alone isn’t enough, and what recent court decisions reveal about admissibility. If you need clarity about your case, connect with a skilled criminal defence lawyer today read more here

​Is it legal for a judge to step in and question a witness during trial? The Court of Appeal outlines strict limits to protect fairness and prevent bias. If you're accused of a crime, understanding the judge’s role can make a difference. Speak to a qualified criminal defence lawyer to ensure your rights are respected throughout the process read more here

When can provocation reduce murder to manslaughter? This article explains the legal framework under section 232(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada, outlining the four key elements required for the partial defence to apply. Understand how evidence is assessed, what constitutes a provoking act, and the impact of recent legal changes. Learn your rights and explore your legal options today read more here

How does the Youth Criminal Justice Act protect the identity of young offenders during sentencing? This article explains publication bans, record retention, and exceptions for adult sentencing. For personalized legal advice, contact an experienced criminal defence lawyer. Understand the Act’s provisions to better protect your rights and future read more here

What are the sentencing rules for youth convicted of murder or manslaughter under the YCJA? Sentences emphasize rehabilitation and reintegration over punishment. If a youth turns 18 before being sentenced, they may be placed in an adult facility, unless it’s in their best interest. Learn about custody limits, conditional supervision, and how age and pre-trial custody impact outcomes. Contact criminal defence lawyer Brian Ross for legal guidance read more here

When can a youth be sentenced to jail under the Youth Criminal Justice Act? This article explains when incarceration is considered, including violent offences, repeat non-compliance, and serious indictable crimes. Learn about sentencing limits, rehabilitation programs, and how the YCJA balances accountability with reintegration. Understand youth custody rules, maximum sentences, and supervision guidelines. Read more to stay informed read more here

Discover why youth sentences are often lighter than adult sentences under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Section 38 outlines how youth sentencing focuses on accountability, meaningful consequences, and rehabilitation to ensure long-term public safety. Learn how judges determine appropriate sentences and the role of remorse in the process. Understanding these principles is key to grasping the youth justice system. Read on to explore how the law balances fairness and rehabilitation in youth sentencing read more here

Discover why youth sentences are often more lenient than adult sentences under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). Section 3(1) outlines key principles that guide sentencing, ensuring accountability while considering factors like intent, harm caused, and the young person’s conduct. Learn how the YCJA balances fair consequences with rehabilitation and proportionality in youth justice. Explore the principles shaping young offenders' sentencing and understand the legal framework designed to foster responsibility and reintegration. Read more to gain valuable insights read more here