reading comprehension 101

open these yt videos/links once a day (or more!) and let the video play unmuted for at least 30+ seconds to boost views! likes and comments also help, but views are the most important!

✦ destiel date video

✦ destiel compilation valentine's day video

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

Lucifer raping Sam, just like Dean not denying being raped by Oberon, were verbal affirmations of rape taking place. Past tense. It already happened. We can’t see it.

The YE confrontation was ongoing, we were watching it as it happened. Rapists don’t shout their intentions before doing so. So for us to just be told “YE is trying tg to sexually intimidate Dean (and Sam 🙄) right now!” wouldn’t make sense.

Other than the fact that JDM is just bigger than Jensen, the camera is placed over Dean’s head in his closeups during this scene in a way we very rarely see for the remainder of the show.

Sam’s chin was lifted, he was still above YE. He wasn’t being looked over like Dean at all. YE and the camera placement and Jensen’s hunched form all IMPLY something here. There’s an unspoken threat happening. At about 1:40 YE really leans in, nearly bumping heads with Dean.

We’re talking in circles now. We watched it differently. And I’m guessing so did the numerous other people that you’ve screenshotted and disagreed with. So this is why your blog confuses me.

Are you upset people see things/are different from you? Do you think all media and, therefore Supernatural, should all be viewed and thought of in a standardized way? Are you upset that people prefer and side with a different character than you do?

You call them hot takes but are also insulting people by calling them dimwits and the like for reading into things that made it into script but got cut in post-production. You accuse people of bias while also having obvious bias. Because people having opinions makes your viewing of the show unsatisfactory?

I had fun talking this out with you (it made me more steadfast in my opinion of this scene and the Winchester dynamics,) but don’t lie and say that that is what you’re trying to do with this blog. There’s a reason you pick out the meta you critique and the pattern is very obvious. You would’ve let the people you screenshot (including my post after I blocked you,) know if you wanted to debate/theorize/whatever-it-is-we-just-did if that was the case. You want a gallery of people to validate you.

I believe that YE was using sexual intimidation towards Dean - using proximity and sexualized language to scare him. Implying rape, harassment, whatever you want to call it.

I think I’ll try the same thing. My main point is that there is nothing to indicate YE is planning to rape Dean to bait Sam. So instead of talking about that, you psychoanalysis me.

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

Lucifer raping Sam, just like Dean not denying being raped by Oberon, were verbal affirmations of rape taking place. Past tense. It already happened. We can’t see it.

The YE confrontation was ongoing, we were watching it as it happened. Rapists don’t shout their intentions before doing so. So for us to just be told “YE is trying tg to sexually intimidate Dean (and Sam 🙄) right now!” wouldn’t make sense.

Other than the fact that JDM is just bigger than Jensen, the camera is placed over Dean’s head in his closeups during this scene in a way we very rarely see for the remainder of the show.

Sam’s chin was lifted, he was still above YE. He wasn’t being looked over like Dean at all. YE and the camera placement and Jensen’s hunched form all IMPLY something here. There’s an unspoken threat happening. At about 1:40 YE really leans in, nearly bumping heads with Dean.

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

Lucifer raping Sam, just like Dean not denying being raped by Oberon, were verbal affirmations of rape taking place. Past tense. It already happened. We can’t see it.

The YE confrontation was ongoing, we were watching it as it happened. Rapists don’t shout their intentions before doing so. So for us to just be told “YE is trying tg to sexually intimidate Dean (and Sam 🙄) right now!” wouldn’t make sense.

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?

I think he was using looming physicality and proximity to Dean as a means to intimidate Dean and force an act out of Sam. What do filmmakers usually insinuate when they have a restrained party being stood over and talked to in a low voice? Assault.

Yellow Eyes is a demon, he’s not above torturing people in this way. I don’t know what people who like to argue with other peoples’ critiques/meta-analyses want exactly. A character to say “I’m going to sexually assault you now.” and then have a five minute scene follow up of them doing so afterward?

Because this was a cable TV show, he’s not going to out and say/do that. So all of the demon’s operate on the Moral Event Horizon, which means other than outright murder (cuz American television isn’t afraid of that sort of assault) the horrible things they do are often just implied. Implications are received differently to each viewer based on experience, belief, and personal circumstances.

There’s a lot of people who hold true that Sam and Dean and anyone who went to hell were probably raped. But that wasn’t in the show, right? So the implications that it happened aren’t feasible, right? Like Hell and demons are above rape?