I thought we made fun of MRAs because they are misguided and misogynistic for believing that feminism is against their interests and they need a movement apart from it. I thought we made fun of them for not understanding that feminism is in favor of men's liberation from the oppressive patriarchal binary as much as women's.
But some of you are actually making fun of MRAs because you think men have no problems to complain about, and feminism ISN'T for men, because they don't need anything, and the patriarchy isn't the enemy, men are?
Oooh I don't think we've been laughing at the same thing. You have lost the plot.
I thought we made fun of people who said "not all men" in response to women discussing sexism because while they are correct that not all men [insert bad behavior here], saying so in certain conversations is just a defensive knee jerk reaction that distracts from the point.
But some of you are actually making fun of any men who ask to be taken seriously and have their needs met and issues heard, even though they aren't talking over women? Some of you are making fun of marginalized men for talking about the experiences at their unique intersections of identities and asking for justice because you actually DO think "all men [insert bad behavior here]?"
Oooooh you are failing feminism 101. You do not understand what the patriarchy even is. You do not understand where its power comes from, who benefits from it, and who is harmed by it. You have not progressed beyond "cooties" level discourse. I am not laughing with you.
This is why you sound like a clown if you call transmasculine people talking about their issues "TMRAs." If you hear men discussing the ways they are harmed by the existing system and the only thing you can think of is obnoxious MRAs, you're telling on yourself. You're broadcasting the fact that you haven't spent enough time engaging with broad feminist viewpoints to know that men's liberation ideas (NOT the same as MRA) are a part of feminism and have been for a long time.
This is why you sound like a clown if you say "trans men who want feminism to be for them are misgendering themselves" and "trans men benefit from the patriarchy because all men benefit from the patriarchy" and "trans men experience no unique injustices because misandry isn't a systemic axis of oppression" and "trans men have male privilege so they can't be oppressed."
Because even if you take "trans" out of these statements, they're still incorrect. Feminism is for people of all genders. Men can be harmed by the patriarchy. The ways in which men are harmed by the patriarchy are different from the ways others are harmed by the patriarchy. Having certain "privileges" in certain contexts doesn't negate the harm of a rigid social structure that punishes nonconformity.
Men can oppose the patriarchy because they want justice for others AND for themselves. There's nothing wrong with that. Giving them shit for talking about that is NOT helping take down the patriarchy.
The patriarchy is not a war of men against women where men are given all the advantages. That's not what feminism is up against.
The patriarchy is a system where ALL people have rigid roles imposed upon them. All else being equal, certain advantages are more likely to be given to men (or masculine people, or people AMAB, or people with male sex characteristics, depending on CONTEXT). But all else is RARELY equal and even when it is, the range of experiences is vast, and the system is rigged against almost everyone.
Because the goal most individuals have, and the right all individuals deserve, is to be themselves, and to do so by choice. And no matter who you are, the patriarchy stands in opposition to this goal. It tells you who you're allowed to be, who you're not allowed to be, what you're allowed to do, and what others are allowed to do to you. This is an injustice for people of all genders.
We're ALL trapped. This system can only be dismantled if we understand the WHOLE thing. Which means we need to listen to everyone when they talk about the harms the system is causing them, from where THEY'RE stuck in it.
How are you going to escape the torture mansion if you don't understand vast swathes of it because you've mistaken your brother for the enemy and closed your ears to him? He's shouting from the torture chamber next to yours, trying to tell you the layout of the room he sees so you can plan your escape together, and you're refusing to listen because he's been given more food and water than you? How do you not see that this attitude is only to the benefit of the torture mansion, not its victims?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
so many common negative reactions to restorative justice seem to boil down to
strawman argument about how supporting restorative justice means you are promoting that every single individual abuse victim needs to love their abuser until they become a good person
thinking "restorative justice" is just "when bad people don't face consequences" with 0 further theoretical depth
thinking that restorative justice is just "when people get forgiven for doing a bad thing" with 0 further theoretical depth (and so if you think about it, restorative justice already exists! no need for any systemic or cultural changes actually!)
thinking "restorative justice" is means "no person or community is ever allowed to engage in self-defense ever"
thinking restorative justice, rather than being an overarching term for frameworks of justice that focus on restoration of wellbeing rather than punishment, is actually One Single Thing + if that One Single Thing has ever been done or ever could be done in a harmful way, then the entire concept of restorative justice can be said to "not work"
going "but what about the victims?????????????" as if victims of harm are currently thriving under the punitive justice model.
^ related to that: assuming everyone who advocates for restorative justice is a privileged white person who has never been abused or faced any serious form of harm or injustice (+ also assuming that every single victim of harm universally hates everyone who hurt them and wants them to suffer and feels they benefit from this system because fuck victims who don't have the "right" emotional response, + also assuming that the emotional response of victims of harm should be the ultimate deciding factor for how our entire system of justice works)
"this system doesn't intuitively make sense to me, a person born and raised entirely within the confines of a national and international society where punitive justice is heavily normalized and naturalized as the only way of managing a society, and in which morality is constantly framed as a black-and-white issue of Bad Person vs Good Person, and in which capitalism heavily incentivizes hyperindividualism, conflict, quick solutions, and emotional catharsis over long-term solutions that require a strong sense of community. all i'm asking for is that you give me a quick simple answer to my question fundamentally shaped by my current worldview that satisfies me right now without changing that worldview at all, and if you can't it means the entire framework of restorative justice is bad. that's all i'm asking!!!!!"
tumblr crunches these a bit, but I turned the saturation way up to make these more closely match how this sand looks in direct sunlight, and this isn't too far off. you can actually see the green and purple bands depending on what angle you're at.
have a zoom!! i promise those are not blown out pixels. rather, that is actually rainbow sand; most of the colorful specks are pieces of sea glass and gemstones! michigan black sand isn't black due to volcanic rock but rather because of the rich soil and many, many other things that mix into it- including the mineral deposits that make this sand magnetic! i have a small baggie at home to play with :)
I know this post is 5+years old -but I just really need to know WHERE this sand is located. because you kinda freaked me out.
You see- I have seen rainbow black sand on 2 occassions- both times, VERY TOXIC do not touch!
A have a bucket of sand from the sandblasting pit at an automotive shop. This looks like paint flakes. SUPER toxic. don't stir it up. don't breathe it. don't let it cut your skin.
the other was a beach on the West coast of India - the entire coast line is covered in colour shifting sand. There was a Crude Oil spill there 15 years ago. people bathe and swim there- The locals have high rates of Cancer.
Speaking of Ojibwe! There’s a new point and click game to help teach the language! It’s called Reclaim! Azhe-giiwewining, and is currently on sale on Steam!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I don't have specific fic recs (except that you should read literally any of @tunemyart's excellent Xena fic on AO3. and then read the rest of her fic because damn), but what I do have is a list of classic Xena fanfic sites. these sites all originated in the 90s when the show was airing and are lovingly maintained to this day (presumably by the same fans, although I don't know that for sure).
The Athenaeum - mostly Xena fic but does feature other fandoms. almost entirely femslash oriented
Academy of Bards - Xena fanfic, still regularly updated!
Merwolf’s Home Page - Melissa Good’s Xena fanfic and original/Uber fic
AUSXIP - The Bard’s Corner - the fanfic section of AUSXIP (the Australian Xena Information Site). probably entirely Xena fic but I don’t actually know
Tom’s Xena Fan Fiction Archive - all Xena fic as far as I know
Tom’s Xena Page - list of fanfic site links - links to other Xena fanfic sites, including review sites. haven’t checked the veracity of any of these links so some of them are probably dead. proceed at your own risk etc
I hope and assume you also know about whoosh.org, which is probably the most famous Xena fan site and has a plethora of episode summaries and commentary. and oh boy did the OG fans have Opinions about AFIN lol.
Fun fact! The dog residue is called sebum, which is oil produced by sebaceous glands, and its primary purpose is to maintain coat health, skin health, and waterproofing!
The reason I know this is because my family had hounds like beagles, bassets, coons, bloods, redbones, etc, and then when I met other dogs, I was amazed that they didn't (comparatively) have dog residue! Turns out, hound breeds naturally produce more sebum than other dogs!
Another fun fact, it's actually just like lanolin! Lanolin is also secreted from the sebaceous glands and is the sheep version of sebum. It has a similar chemical makeup to human sebum as well, but instead of fat (in human sebum) lanolin has a heavier wax content.
This is why we prize it above other types of sebaceous secretions commercially, because the wax creates a barrier much like petroleum jelly, but it is similar enough to our own sebum that it actively help moisturizes our skin as well. It is both occlusive and emollient!
We use it in medicinal topical creams, makeup products, moisturizers, and more! It's primary purpose, like all sebaceous secretions, is skin and hair health and protection, and waterproofing!
Anyway, I just wanted to share my weird and niche farm knowledge, but this post is brought to you by the FFA, 4H, and the fact that I spent my entire childhood with my hands covered in Residue.
You unlocked one of my niche special interests! DAMMIT. I don't' wanna derail the DOG -residue post to yammer about Sheep and Lanolin though. Are you a biochemist? or like a pharmacist? where does one learn about constituent parts like occlusives and emollients in wax vs. fat based sebum?!?
@rosslynpaladin .. There's been endless (valid-i think) controversy over the planning and production of this film. I follow a couple of Greek folks and have been getting their local narrative for over a year.. it's Really Shitty. Very *Hollywood*.
Find meaning. Distinguish melancholy from sadness. Go out for a walk. It doesn't have to be a romantic walk in the park, spring at its most spectacular moment, flowers and smells and outstanding poetical imagery smoothly transferring you into another world. It doesn't have to be a walk during which you'll have multiple life epiphanies and discover meanings no other brain ever managed to encounter. Do not be afraid of spending quality time by yourself. Find meaning or don't find meaning but "steal" some time and give it freely and exclusively to your own self. Opt for privacy and solitude. That doesn't make you antisocial or cause you to reject the rest of the world. But you need to breathe. And you need to be.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Shane Hollander is a jock, Shane Hollander does not wear anything but athletic wear, Shane Hollander does not have a skincare routine.
Shane Hollander routinely uses sunscreen(for safety against skin cancer) and washes his face with a sensitive skin friendly soap in the shower. He uses the same bar for his entire body.
Beyond that his smooth skin is entirely coincidental. Ilya is very jealous of this. Ilya wears hair products, styles himself meticulously and has tried multiple skincare routines. None of which are giving him the supple skin he desires.
The first time Ilya goes to Shane's real apartment and not the sex condo he is outraged by the number of unused samples of skincare products, mostly because these brands are choosing to work with Shane when he knows for a fact that Shane does nothing to properly take care of his skin.
Shane's bathroom sink is barren.
Shane *enters Ilya's bathroom*: why do you have so much clutter in here
Ilya *outraged*: is not clutter Hollander we did not all climb out of womb and become world's prettiest man by accident
Shane *having no filter*: why do you bother with it if it doesn't work?
TFW you're making a spindle whorl and have to open up the second set of burners on the torch. The room is normally lit. The camera just had to compensate for my fucking flamethrower.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The Mütter pulled its own YouTube channel, January of '23. So why were the skulls ever on the wall in the first place?
Okay so the thing everyone believes about the Mütter Museum is that it's a Victorian freakshow with a medical license — creepy doctors just loved collecting pickled weirdness, and Philadelphia kept the cabinet. No. The collection is a contract. In 1858 Thomas Dent Mütter handed the College of Physicians of Philadelphia about 1,700 specimens and a $30,000 endowment — call it a million and change now — and the money came with conditions in writing: a fireproof brick building, a paid curator, an annual lecture, on a deadline. Miss the deadline, lose the money. The skulls are on the wall because a dying surgeon wrote a covenant with teeth, and I think that's the most beautiful thing in the building, including the Soap Lady.
But back up, because the contract doesn't make sense until you know what market it was written into.
cw extreme deformity below the break
Philadelphia in the first half of the nineteenth century was the medical capital of the United States, and I don't mean that as civic boosterism, I mean it as a count of enrolled bodies — Penn's school going back to 1765, Jefferson Medical College chartered in 1824, and then a whole shaggy undergrowth of proprietary schools, which is a polite term for a diploma business run out of a rented hall by four guys splitting the ticket revenue. Because that's what a medical lecture was. Ticket revenue. A student bought a ticket to each professor's course, directly, cash to the man, and after two winters of tickets he was a doctor. No state licensing that meant anything — Pennsylvania's had collapsed, most states' had, the Jacksonian mood being that licensing was monopoly and monopoly was aristocracy, which, fine, it was. So the credential was worth what the school's name was worth and the school's name was worth what its professors could draw.
Which means a professor of surgery in 1841 Philadelphia isn't an academic, he's a headliner, he's carrying the gate.
And Mütter could carry a gate. Jefferson hired him at thirty and he packed the amphitheater — this vain, charming, gorgeously dressed Virginia orphan (raised on somebody else's money after yellow fever took the whole family, there's a whole other post in how many antebellum professional men were orphans capitalized by a guardian's estate, not tonight) who did the surgeries nobody else would touch. Burn contractures, mostly. Women whose faces had fused to their chests because a cooking fire caught the dress — and hold that thought about the dresses, I owe you on it — and Mütter would cut a flap from the unburned back and swing it around and give the woman her neck back. Before anesthesia, most of this. Then ether shows up in late 1846 and he's the first surgeon in Philadelphia to use it, weeks after Boston, because a man whose income is his amphitheater does not let the other fellow demonstrate the miracle first.
The specimens were the same business. You taught from the thing — the wet preparation, the sawed skull, the wax model ordered from Paris at real cost — because the students were comparison shopping and the school with the better collection sold more tickets. A teaching collection was capital equipment. Jefferson's trustees understood their museum cabinet the way a mill owner understood his looms.
So now the 1858 gift reads right. Mütter is dying — gout, lungs, he's mid-forties and wrecked — and he's sitting on a lifetime of accumulated teaching capital that will be scattered at auction the day he stops breathing, the way every dead professor's cabinet got scattered. And across town is the College of Physicians, founded 1787, Benjamin Rush and that crowd, which is not a school at all. A club of the kind of physician who wanted a wall between himself and the diploma-mill trade, and who had lost, remember, the licensing war — the state wouldn't build the wall for them. So the club had to build the wall out of other materials. A library. A fellowship you had to be elected to. And now, for $30,000 and a fireproof building, the finest pathological collection in America.
The club got the collateral. That's what the Mütter Museum is — the physical asset the Philadelphia medical elite borrowed its authority against, in the decades when the law wouldn't underwrite the loan. You couldn't point to a state license, so you pointed to the building. The marble, the specimens, the endowed lecture. Walk a legislator through two floors of catalogued human pathology and the question "what makes you gentlemen different from the botanic healer on Race Street" answers itself, wordlessly, at scale.
Which is insane, a little. We credentialed American medicine on real estate and jarred organs. But it worked.
And the collection kept accreting in exactly that spirit, and every famous object in the place is a receipt from some specific fight if you flip it over. The Hyrtl skulls — the wall of 139 skulls everybody photographs — bought from Joseph Hyrtl of Vienna in 1874, and the point of them was polemic: Hyrtl assembled ordinary named Central Europeans, each skull inked with a name, an age, an occupation, a cause of death, to demonstrate that skull shape tracked nothing — no criminality, no race-science destiny — a standing artillery position against phrenology, which in 1874 was the competition, and the competition was doing numbers. The Chang and Eng material is there because when the most famous conjoined twins on earth died in 1874 the commission that got the autopsy was — well, whose amphitheater do you think? Philadelphia collected the liver like a trading house collecting a famous debt. Grover Cleveland's jaw tumor is in a jar there because the 1893 surgery was done in secret on a yacht in the East River — the country was in a financial panic and a president with cancer would have cratered the gold markets, so they took his upper jaw out at sea and lied about it for twenty-four years — and when the truth finally came out, the specimen surfaced at the College, naturally, because where else does establishment medicine bank its secrets. Einstein's brain slides landed there in 2011 by way of the pathologist who'd simply kept the brain, which is its own whole racket.
The Soap Lady, since you're going to ask — exhumed 1875, a Philadelphia burial ground being cleared for development, and Joseph Leidy paid the exhumation crew for her because her fat had saponified into adipocere. Paid them, the record suggests, by fudging the paperwork fee. The most famous woman in the museum was acquired for something like the price of a good dinner, off a construction site.
Anyway.
Now the supply chain, and I won't be cute about it: the specimens came from the people who couldn't refuse. Almshouse dead, unclaimed dead, and — before Pennsylvania regularized it — the resurrection trade. In 1882 the Philadelphia press caught a ring lifting bodies out of Lebanon Cemetery, the Black cemetery, and selling them to Jefferson's anatomy rooms at a going rate of a few dollars a corpse, with the cemetery's own superintendent in on the take. Somebody's cousin at every gate. The scandal produced the Anatomy Act of 1883, which didn't stop the flow of poor people's bodies into the teaching supply — it legalized it, routed the unclaimed dead to the schools by statute, cut out the middlemen and their wagons. The reform, as usual, was a change of invoice. And the man from Lebanon Cemetery whose name the clerk didn't bother to record is exactly as present in American medical training as Mütter is. More present, by headcount. The clerk just didn't write it down.
I said I'd come back to the dresses, and here it is, quickly: the burn contractures Mütter built his reputation repairing were an industrial injury. Open hearths, whale-oil lamps, and women's fashion in flammable fabrics — the medical literature of the period logs "her clothing took fire" as a routine entry, a thing that just happens, hundreds of times a year in every city, mostly to women, mostly to poor women, because the cheap fabrics burned fastest. Mütter's genius was real. His raw material was the going price of cotton and the absence of a fire-safe lamp. The monster operations were downstream of the dry-goods trade.
Then the whole ecosystem that produced the collection died, on schedule. The Flexner Report in 1910 did what the College's marble never could — got the state and the foundations to torch the proprietary schools, cut American medical schools roughly in half inside twenty years, moved the credential from the professor's gate to the university and the licensing board. The ticket-selling headliner professor went extinct. The teaching collection stopped being capital equipment, because now you taught from slides and journals and, eventually, scans. Every other medical museum in America quietly deaccessioned, rotted, or burned.
The Mütter survived for the most boring reason available, which as regular readers know is my highest compliment: the 1858 contract. Fireproof building, paid curator, endowed lecture, in perpetuity. The covenant outlived the market it was written for, and the collateral just sat there, appreciating into a tourist attraction — some 180,000 visitors a year at its peak, keeping the whole College afloat, the club now living off the cabinet instead of the other way around.
Then 2023: new management pulled the museum's YouTube videos and calaveras merch overnight and announced a rethink of whether the remains should be displayed at all, provenance and consent and all that, and the staff revolted and the goths revolted and half the leadership was gone within a couple of years. And everyone covered this as a culture-war story, the sensitivity people versus the fun-weird people.
But look at the shape of it. A body of physicians, anxious about their profession's legitimacy, arguing that the way you display authority over the dead is exactly what separates real medicine from the disreputable kind. That's not a new argument at the Mütter — that's the founding argument. In 1858 the display was the proof of legitimacy; in 2023 the reluctance to display is the proof; the asset didn't change, the reserve requirement did. The College is doing what it has always done, which is mark its collateral to the current market for respectability.
My bet, flat, no hedge: the Soap Lady is still on view in 2033. The gate revenue is the endowment now, and covenants written by dying surgeons have a way of holding.
The skulls have names painted on them. Hyrtl did that on purpose, in 1874, to win a fight about what a skull could prove.
That fight's running again, and the skulls are still up on the wall, named, waiting to get marked to whatever the market for respectability wants next.
The way isolation plays on your psyche, and the way that a solid support system can improve your life is insane. One of the worst things that we did as a society is removing most avenues to find this kind of thing, and the over reliance on the idea of getting better on your own