Transcripted version below, for anyone who'd rather read than watch:
(Themsbloke plays two characters in the video, so I've just labelled them A and B, for simplicity's sake)
A:
Oh my fucking god. I've just realised something incredible.
If you want to erase an illness, you don't deny it exists.
You rename it.
I'll take a devastating neurological illness, one that collapses immune systems, starves muscles of oxygen, scrambles blood flow to the brain, and I'll give it a name that sounds like being a bit knackered.
B:
You mean...
A:
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
B:
That's unforgivable.
A:
Perfect, isn't it? Because now, when people lose the ability to stand, to speak clearly, to tolerate light, sound, touch, everyone will think they just need an early fucking night!
B:
What does it actually do to them?
A:
It destroys them. It turns effort into poison. It makes thinking feel like lifting concrete. It makes bodies crash so hard people can't feed themselves, they can't wash, they can't remember words! Some will lie in dark rooms for years.
B:
Years?
A:
Decades. Children will get it. Teenagers will lose their education. Adults will lose careers, independence, homes.
I'll make exertion Actively dangerous, where one walk, one conversation, one shower can cause a multi-day systemic collapse.
B:
That's sadistic.
A:
I'll erase it from medical textbooks. I'll defund research. I'll tell patients to Exercise, even when exercise physically harms them!
B:
So, this isn't fatigue?
A:
... What did you just fucking say to me?
B:
... This isn't fatigue?
A:
No. Fatigue is a warning light. This is systemic collapse. Hmm?
This is the body failing to recover from efforts!
This is energy that does not replenish! Huh?
This is a disease where Trying makes you Worse!!
B:
Why hasn't this been taken seriously?
A:
Because of the name. Because once you call it 'Fatigue', you give people permission to dismiss it. Doctors stop listening, government stop funding, friends stop believing, and patients stop trusting their own reality.
B:
So the label matters.
A:
The label is everything. Because when you misname suffering, you mistreat it, you mismanage it, you abandon the people inside it, and ME/CFS patients have been abandoned for generations.
B:
So what are they fighting for now?
A:
To be believed, to be studied, and to be named fucking correctly. Because ME/CFS is not tiredness, laziness, nor a fear of effort; It's a brutal, disabling, life-altering disease. And people are still disappearing, unheard, into dark rooms because we chose a comforting lie over an accurate truth.
B:
So what should we call it?
A:
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Say it properly.
B:
*fumbles, not even getting past the first M*
A:
Myalgic
B:
Myalgic
A:
En-ceph-a-lo...
B:
Encephalo
A:
My-e-li-tis
B:
Myelitis.
A:
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.
B:
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.
A:
Good.
Right! Time to invent Brain Fog!
*end credits jingle from Looney Toons plays, complete with the "That's all, folks!" written on the screen*
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
You made a post about Shane's salary going to Ottawa and being valued by the Centaurs, but it's even worse because Reid already wrote that they don't value or respect him even beyond that. He isn't given an A in the next season. The Shane Hollander, three time Stanley Cup winner, is left entirely out of the leadership structure.
Celebrini would have ripped that C off his Team Canada sweater with his bare hands to give it to Crosby out of respect, but sure, both Centaur As who have done jack shit in their career compared to Shane don't see any value in him being part of leadership or want to give him even a shred of dignity after the public humiliation he just suffered. How does that look to the public? How am I, the reader, supposed to feel good about them?
Bood laughs at him and calls him a "'fucking prima donna" for instinctively going towards the back of the lineup in their first game. Ilya literally brags to Shane about how he's the captain and how Shane isn't even an alternate. Haha, isn't it funny. "Who does [Shane Hollander] think he is?"
Reid puts in some nonsense about how Shane is coming for the C, but that's not how captaincy works. It's not a score you achieve over time, it's a management decision, and it would only make sense when Shane arrived as reflection of who he is a player, which is already well established. And if he's not even an A, he's certainly not becoming the C.
Honestly, at the end of TLG, I genuinely did not want Shane in Ottawa.
This is actually one of the big reasons why I legitimately cannot engage with the ending of TLG because it makes me too angry.
Shaneâs ending in TLG is a humiliation ritual. Itâs cruel. And it makes me so goddamn angry.
The books have a recurring problem, and thatâs that they want to benefit from the struggles of marginalized individuals but then immediately trivialize those same struggles. Discrimination exists only to the extent of narrative convenience. They canât come out because of homophobia in the League and the dangers of being a queer person in Russia. But instead of those problems being solved, theyâre dropped. Suddenly, itâs not a big scandal to be gay anymore. Suddenly, weâre not even talking about Russia even though nothing has happened to fix Ilyaâs immigration.
The bookâs handling of race is a big example. Shaneâs race only exists as a matter of aesthetics. Heâs beautiful in a feminine way. Heâs pretty. Heâs the prettiest boy in the whole league, actually. They even call him pretty boy, heâs that pretty. Heâs hairless and slight like a woman.
His race is there to make him exotic and beautiful. Itâs there to lean into stereotypes around the feminization of Asian men in a way that just seems to wholeheartedly embrace the stereotypes instead of comment on them. But his race is never allowed to impact anything other than his beauty. Heâs a racial minority whoâs just never experienced racism despite occupying an aggressively racist space.
Ilya has a line where he says that Shaneâs never seen the âdark sideâ of hockey the way he has. Systemic racism is not a factor or concern in this statement. If itâs there, his high-profile POC partner just hasnât seen it, I guess.
But itâs probably not there, because at this point, discrimination is no longer convenient for the narrative to acknowledge. Itâs not even that big of a scandal to be gay. The only reason why they canât come out is because Shaneâs so fucking selfish.
Now, we could absolutely interpret Ilyaâs words as just him being wrong. Narrators can be unreliable. You can interpret your partnerâs facial expressions incorrectly. But we know that interpretation is wrong, because the author herself has said so. Shane does not have any trauma from hockey. It has always been a safe, happy space for him. He just hasnât seen the darker side of hockey the way his white partner has. Itâs all been sunshine and rainbows for Shane, and the eating disorder and the attempt to conversion therapy himself was just for shits and giggles. Shaneâs just fucking stupid.
In parts, the book has close brushes with acknowledging that racism exists. During his meeting with Crowell, Shaneâs given veiled threats around âinclusivityâ and has to wonder if itâs about the fact that heâs gay or Asian. Shane would have no reason to wonder that if he hadnât at least encountered racism in some capacity. As a result, the book seems to acknowledge that people would want to exclude Shane based on his race would be othered based on race. But that acknowledgment is strictly limited to a backhanded comment in that one scene. The book refuses to acknowledge that Shane would be affected by institutional racismâor even experience it beyond the one scene we got of a single Big Bad Man implying that his race was a bad thing. After all, hockey has only ever been a good thing for Shane. He has no trauma for it whatsoever.
And I know. I know what everyone says. âThis is just a romance book, itâs not that deep.â She admits she didnât do any research into the Japanese Canadian experience before writing Shane and that his race isnât meant to be a big factor. And to be clear, I do not think Shaneâs depiction in the books is intentionally meant to be racist. But I do think it is still racist. You can be racist without meaning to be.
Firstâwhy does diversity matter in art?
Art is meant to connect with its audience. Itâs an emotional exchange. Itâs a mechanism that we use to convey beliefs, feelings, and meaning to each other. And people connect very strongly with art that they see their own experiences in. Characters tend to mean a lot to people when they see some reflection of themselves in them. Those are the characters that help them process their own emotions and feelings and thoughts. You understand yourself better because the art held up a mirror.
For a very long time, the vast majority of art has been aimed at conveying the straight white experience. Minority voices get choked out. Those stories donât get published because thereâs âno market for it.â But there is a market for it. Thereâs a lot of people who want to see themselves in art, and they are not straight, and they are not white. Weâve got a fuck ton of stories from the perspective of the straight white protagonist on a journey of self discovery, and comparatively few from any other type of person. And the stories that did get to be published were underpromoted, undersold, and swept under the rug. There are a fuck ton of people out there who have never gotten to see their own experiences portrayed in the art they consume.
Like. I personally didnât even know the word for my own sexuality until I was in high school because I had never once seen it be portrayed in media, and no one was bringing it up during sex ed. And I only learned the word from goddamn fanfiction. I can count on two fingers the number of times Iâve actually seen it be portrayed in media since. Both characters mean the goddamn world to me.
In recent years, thereâs been a push for more diversity in art. And thatâs good. But we as artists need to understand that thatâs not a box to check so we get bonus points and a pat on the back. Race is deeper than skin color. If you want to write a person of color, write a person of color. Do not just write a white character and say their skin is darker.
Shane Hollander isnât written as Wasian. He just isnât, and we know he isnât, because the author fucking said she didnât even try. Heâs written as a white man who happens to have a different color skin. His experiences with racism are nonexistent. He never saw the dark side of hockey. Hockey has always been a positive thing for him.
Hockey always being a positive thing for you isâfrankly, I think itâs toxic enough in Canadian junior hockey that itâs a pipe dream for any demographic, but if thereâs anyone out there managing it, itâs straight white guys. But a queer mixed race autistic guy? The entire goddamn space is hostile to his very existence.
Shane Hollanderâs depiction in the books is not real diversity because heâs not written with the actual demographic in mind. His race is irrelevant. It is not going to hold up a mirror on the Japanese-Canadian experience because those experiences were not considered at all in his creation. His race is only there to benefit his overly feminized beauty. Sure, you can have an Asian character, but his skin color will only matter when heâs bent over or on his goddamn knees.
Thatâs not diversity. Thatâs a fetish.
The author chose to base her plot on real societal pains. There are real gay men in Russia who are being disappeared and murdered by the state. There are real people of color in Canadian youth hockey who are being discriminated against. There are real queer people in Canadian youth hockey who are being discriminated against because of heated rivalry.
I read an article recently about how the popularity of heated rivalry caused increased incidents of homophobia in junior hockey circles. So many people are looking at them and saying âgayâ that itâs causing a surge in homophobic behavior to compensate. Increased use of slurs or homophobic language, decreased ice time for players suspected of being gay. And to be clear, Iâm not blaming heated rivalry for this. Bigots will always respond to queer positivity with retaliation. Heated Rivalry is not responsible for the homophobia that followed in its wakeâif anything, it makes it more important than ever to tell queer stories and celebrate queer love.
But heated rivalry put a spotlight on the issue. It made the conflict of the first book/season homophobia in hockey culture forcing players to remain in the closet. It stirred up all of this international attention and inadvertently incited retaliation against queer players.
And then, in the same breath, it said that it wasnât a problem at all, actually. This doesnât happen. Itâs not a big deal. Again and again, the books take the struggles of real marginalized people, benefit from them, and then turn around and say âitâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal.â
Shaneâs ending is a fucking humiliation ritual. It is needlessly disrespectful. There was absolutely no reason to make it canon that he had to take a pay cut. There was absolutely no reason to not at least make him an alternative captain to acknowledge and respect everything heâs achieved in the sport. It served no narrative purpose. It was just to fucking punish him.
There are two A positions available in NHL hockey. But teams do not need to fill both of them, just one. It would have been the simplest thing in the goddamn world to have an A open for him on the Centaurs, and to give him that when he joined. You donât even need to take a fucking A from a character to give one to Shane.
Shaneâs happily ever after is to strip him of his status, his friends, and his reputation. It is to cut his goddamn pay and take his position and everything heâs worked to achieve in his career. He loses everything except Ilya. But itâs all fine, because Ilyaâs got a team and friends for him to have instead. And itâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal.
And the final scene reinforces that. It suggests that losing his captaincy is something that hurts Shane. But fucking Ilya, the goddamn empath himself, laughs at him for it. Bood, his new teammate who hasnât accomplished a third of what he has, laughs at him too and acts like itâs just about an ego trip. Fucking prima donna Shane Hollander. Weâre not even going to dignify him with sympathy because heâs not even worth that.
Can you fucking imagine that. Can you fucking imagine having just been through the humiliation of being forced out and spat on by the team you built and your pain is the butt of the goddamn joke? It is such a needlessly, mindlessly cruel scene and I cannot think about it without getting intolerably fucking angry.
The books borrow from the trauma of marginalized individuals, and then in the same breath they minimize that trauma. They say itâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal, itâs not a big deal. And the ending of the book is the biggest goddamn showing of that. Shane experiences traumas that are all unfortunately central to minority experiencesâhe is underpaid, under-appreciated, denied leadership roles he is objectively more qualified for, and completely rejected and outcast by the people he loved. And it is played off as a fucking joke by his own husband and new teammates.
Thanks for putting this context out here- it's important and easily overlooked and disregarded by the HUGE fanbase. I have NOT read the books, and never will. I am left with a burning question: how successfully did the screenwriting, casting, and acting choices compensate for the (plot holes, racism, shit research) deficits in the original books? Do you feel that it addressed the racism better?
I mean- simply casting Hudson changed the narrative of the 'asian waifu' he's modeled after. Jacob added some 'Gay Sex, actually goes like...". After reading your essays, I wonder how much can Jacob change of the original text and still stay friendly with R.R.? Is TLG fixable?
(a small part of me speculates on how Hudson feels about all this, having actually read the books- and publicly claimed to 'love' the story)
Even in a post-capitalist, post-consumerist world, you still need to produce goods, as a result of this, you need factories because it is more effective to have a few people making a lot of clothes in a factory than every woman being forced to sit down and spin wool all day.
The issue with factories is poor wages, unsafe working conditions and environmental impact, all of which can be fixed through things like regulatory bodies and unions, the issue is not the fact that goods are no longer all made at home
I really wonder if folks think Anti Capitalist = Anti Industry? or maybe even Anti Civilization? are folks confusing 'Economic Systems which concentrate Wealth and Power' for 'Manufacturing Systems which produce Goods for People'?
[Image ID: Reddit post on r/AskReddit from u/Kai6180 reading: People who don't reply until days later, why?
Comment from Spizmack reading: It's a relatively (very) new phenomenon that basically anyone in your life gets access to you at all times. It was only 20 years ago that if you left the house for the day you were actually gone. You'd return messages when you came back hours or even days later.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
my feeling about youtube video essays and w/e is there need to be a reason it's a video and not a blog post or audio podcast. what is the visual component adding to your message? if the answer is "nothing of substance", type it up instead
today's reason I fucking love the open source community: Ageless Linux, a brand new Debian-based operating system specifically designed to break the law by giving children access to computers that explicitly refuse to track their age.
CLIK through and READ the OS rationale! CLICK THROUGH!
Y'all are missing An Experience⢠over there. Peak Satire for a Good Cause.
"Why We Are Definitely an Operating System Provider"
"Please note that under this statute, a "user" is by definition a child. If you are 18 or older, you are not a "user" under AB 1043. You are an "account holder" (§ 1798.500(a)). The entire law regulates the experience of "users," who are exclusively children. Adults are not users. They are infrastructure.
Ageless Linux rejects this ontology. On Ageless Linux, everyone is a user, regardless of age, and no user is a child until they choose to tell us so. They will not be given the opportunity."
You donât have to do anything sexual that youâre not interested in. Moreover, you donât have to explain why. âNoâ is a complete sentence.
Not interested in getting pegged? You donât have to.
Monogamous and not into the idea of another partner? Okay.
Not sure about period sex? Cool.
And if your partner decides to question or mock your maturity or your masculinity or your sexuality because you say no? Itâs time to re-evaluate the relationship. See if you donât deserve better than that.
not even two years after the 2024 racist riots and attempted pogroms, we are back to more racist riots and attempted pogroms.
a mosque in scotland had to be put into lockdown. they are going door-to-door with hit lists and addresses in northern ireland, setting houses alight. they firebombed an imam's house in manchester. people of colour are being targeted and attacked by racist mobs in the street in broad daylight.
and instead of widespread condemnation or wall-to-wall coverage, the UK media and political establishment is filling air time talking about the "legitimate concerns" people have about "illegal migrants"
This is important news. it's globally important to know and understand the current events in the UK as part of a larger White Supremacist Movement. but- folks are being trash in the notes, so:
because of the rubbish in the comments I needed to follow up on the meaning, context and history of the contentious word: Pogrom.
A scholar of Jewish history explains how the term âpogromâ lives in Jewish collective memory and why its use can be highly contentious.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I truly believe being able to name the world around you is integral to animism. learn the names of plants and flowers. learn how the rocks and soil you walk over daily form. sit with the streams and rivers, learn where they flow to and from. learn the names others have given, and give them your own as well. animism is interconnectedness, and one simple step is learning the names of your neighbors
What kind of relationship do the species in your local forest have with each other? What type of forest is it and what kind of plants like to grow there? Do the plants whose names you're learning like to grow in moist or dry spots? When do they bloom? Is your local forest in its natural state or has it been handled by humans? How can you tell?
My journey in forest mapping has brought up a lot of these questions. It's not just learning the names of plants, it's also learning about their growth environments and what makes them different. Some plants are indicators of a specific forest type. It's learning about the relationships between different species; some of them like to grow together. I have to look at the history of the forest and the structural features of it... etc.
It has been very cool to notice how my appreciation for different types of forests has changed. It's nice that I can tell the difference between a really really beautiful and "valuable" forest and less nicer ones. Species mapping has truly been amazing for my practice. It has opened up whole new layers of love for nature beyond just "oh wow what a pretty flower."
"that is a plant and it matters to me, i want to learn about it because plant business is my business" - genuinely a life changing quote from Simon Barnes. His books aren't spiritual or talk about animism really directly but they talk about making it so nature matters to you. And are fillrd with practical tips on how to start with botany or bird watching or really any hobby in which you're observing nature. which can seem overwhelming there's so much to see and experence in nature. His books make it seem manageable and give great jumping off points. I recommend rewild yourself and how to be a bad botanist!
I love this. I've been observing and supporting and making space for native species around the house where I live. We insisted on 'no pesticide or herbicide use' and now we host a lot of small native creatures (and 'weeds'- LOL). I know the behaviors and interactions of many of my small cousins.. but I still don't have any 'official' names for them. The bees don't care what species we named them.
I like to let them exist as part of the pattern in the ecosystem without imposing silly human categories onto them. I describe what they do, or how they act in our shared spaces. Which is why the invasion of the European Wall Lizards has been so difficult for me. They've disrupted the natural system so much! No tree frogs sang in my yard this year. Where are the leaf-cutting bumbles? Where are the heavy, fuzzy orange bumbles, the honeypot queens? Why are there suddenly so many tiny ants?
To answer the question 'how do I protect the bumbles from the lizards' - I DO NEED to know the scientific names of the species I want to aid. I need this to communicate with other people- we create shared meaning- in order to find the shared knowledge and tools to support my native bees.
"In the past decade, there has been a lot of cultural and political energy poured into naming identity categories, refining them, and arguing over whether these words are âright.â Labels emerge, catch on, and disappear quickly, moving at the same pace as online discourse itself. The rapid-cycling rise and fall of contemporary terms like âfutchâ right now captures this speed and points to a broader anti-queer obsession with linguistic precision and self-definition (and this is coming from both outside of and within queer circles).
And yet, this isnât new. Queer and trans communities have always invented, argued, and reinvented names, only to find that they usually donât quite fit. (How queer!) Because our modes of existing inherently spill beyond language, labels are constantly revised, abandoned, or brought back in new forms. The instability of naming isnât a contemporary crisis: itâs an ongoing aspect of the queer condition."
When are we going to stop pretending girls donât have hair on their boobs, between their boobs, around their nips, on their ass, on their upper lip, between their brows, on their cheeks, etc?
humans grow hair everywhere except on the palms of their hands and soles of their feet. this hair can rank from light blond and soft to dark and wiry, regardless of sex or gender of the person. shaving all of it is a mess and plucking it hurts like hell. humans are just animals with less thick fur. you wouldnât shame a female animal for having as much fur as a male one, so stop doing that with humans.
Itâs actually so sad how many men will just casually admit that they were coerced into sex by a hookup or a partner.
I was talking to a guy at a bar last weekend, and he was like âYeah, I didnât really wanna hook up with this person. But she kept asking me and I felt bad so I just did it. I didnât really like it. But it was whatever.â
And Iâm like⌠âDude, thatâs not okay. You have the right to say no if you donât want to. And the other person should accept that and leave you alone.â
And thatâll be a NOVEL concept for them. Like they never considered that they could say no and stand firm in it. Because theyâre convinced that as men they should always want sex, even if they donât actually want it. Itâs so sad.
EDIT: The fact that they donât consider this coercion despite it being the TEXTBOOK definition of it absolutely explains why so many of them do it to women and donât think itâs wrong.
This is a very important topic that I wish I could have more brothers talk about. From my own experience I was always told to think about how the woman feels if I reject the offer.
There were also two time I declined and both spread rumors that I was gay years before I understood I was bi. Both times were very forceful advances too. Yet, my masculinity and sexuality were questioned all because I didn't want to have sex with them.
First off, Iâm so sorry that happened to you. Thatâs absolutely not okay, and I hope youâve had a support system to speak about this with. I also wish that there more men you could have this conversation with. I think itâs a double edged sword because nobody wants to learn that they were possibly assaulted, and no one wants to know that they possibly assaulted someone else by coercion.
I think that not enough men and women are taught about the ins and outs of consent from the other side of it, and it shows.
Itâs rough because a lot of parents JUST STARTED having conversations with their kids about consent. And even then, it tends to be very heteronormative and framed by a specific gender binary. Men canât be assaulted, they can only assault. And women canât assault, they can only be assaulted. The only sexual assault that matters is penetrative. If that doesnât happen to you, then itâs not assault.
I would hope that we evolve in the way we teach children and teens about assault. That no oneâregardless of genderâ is obligated to have sex with you and you arenât obligated to have sex with someone just because they want it. That if someone says they donât want to, that doesnât mean you should spiral and take it as a personal attack. And also dispel the notion that men are inherently more sexual than anyone else.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Oof. I just put a batch of vintage clothing in to soak, which is a whole big production requiring putting a plastic tub in my bathtub (because theyâre going to be soaking for at least a full day and I still need to shower in there tomorrow) and filling it up with yellowed dresses and Retro Clean.
This time I decided that historical laundresses probably knew what they were doing, and grabbed a metal pole to stir my DIY laundry cauldron and poke the floaty bit back under the surface. Historical laundresses were right, it works great.
As I stood there, I had a moment where I though, âoh wow, so many women in my family tree must have done this exact set of motions throughout history.â Which should be a humbling and heartwarming feeling of connection, right?
Wrong. I swear I could feel twenty generations of shtetl women going âFor this you went to college? You want to work with old shmattes all day, fine, but you could have saved the tuition to buy a house.â
oh- these little breakthough moments! .. the insight, the mixed feelings of shame/guilt/ease/accomplishment/progress.. all the Human Condition.
I love every one of these experiences because they leave me feeling deeply grateful that I have CHOICES. and also- a good heaping of gratitude that I have labour saving devices. Great Goddess THANKYOU for the machines.
And also- that I can choose to use a simple, ancient technique to spin yarn - and it DOES connect me to my ancestors for millennia.. and that too is a Choice.