amour

Why does this need to exist?

First, I don't know if it even really counts as a micro label for radnormals.

If the creator of radnormality defines radnormality as being against non-traumagenic systems, then every single radnormie would fit this by definition.

And if, as it says, it's meant to encompass literally all of the people who are opposed to non-traumagenic systems, including the ones that don't identify as radnormies, think that's not really a micro label either. It's just another word for sysmed. You've just coined a word for something which already exists and already has multiple words to describe it.

It's also, medically speaking, a bit of an oxymoron. Normality in medicine is defined by the absence of a disorder. That's what the whole boundary with normality in the ICD-11 is about.

And I wouldn't bat an eye at this if it was some type of anti-psych label rejecting how psychiatry treats people with mental illnesses as not being normal. If that was the statement that was being made here, fine.

No. Plurality = Systemhood = CDDs. Psychology supports that the formation of autonomous identity states is exclusive to extreme levels of dissociation. There is no apparent reason for the brain to form these identities otherwise. It’s not how our brains are designed to work.

RADQUEERS FUCK OFFFFFFF IDDJJDJD

yes, WE hate radqueers

why are we using transphobic wojaks ???? #NotVeryWokeOfYou

there is no good reason to use something created by transphobes (and most likely nazis too, seeing the environment these things originate from) you are literally just a piece of shit

your dni does not exempt you from people pointing this out either. you are a bigot. this is bigoted behavior. you cannot use something made by nazis and transphobes in good faith.

You are scum.

(also i am in the lgbqtai+ so how am i transphobic y'all acting like im the one that made the original image????)

if you did like five minutes of research you would understand that most of the nazis in our community that you speak of are:

a. non ideological, so they just use the term and aesthetic to look big and bad without believing in the hateful things nazis do

or b. have slipped in and make themselves look like theyre radqueer, when it goes against radqueer ideology in the first place

and besides.. why would a true nazi want to label themselves as queer? when, yknow, theyre literally one of the minorities they dragged into their genocide? lets do some basic research and use some common sense

thats exactly what i wrote yeah. whats your point

did you not read anything i said

i need you to read what i said very slowly and then process it because i cannot spell it out any clearer

maybe read my other reblogs !

are you illiterate on purpose

youre allowed to be uncomfortable yeah. its nazis. i just think its weird how people dont understand what transnazis are or think theyre on par with actual real life ones

yes, WE hate radqueers

why are we using transphobic wojaks ???? #NotVeryWokeOfYou

there is no good reason to use something created by transphobes (and most likely nazis too, seeing the environment these things originate from) you are literally just a piece of shit

your dni does not exempt you from people pointing this out either. you are a bigot. this is bigoted behavior. you cannot use something made by nazis and transphobes in good faith.

You are scum.

(also i am in the lgbqtai+ so how am i transphobic y'all acting like im the one that made the original image????)

if you did like five minutes of research you would understand that most of the nazis in our community that you speak of are:

a. non ideological, so they just use the term and aesthetic to look big and bad without believing in the hateful things nazis do

or b. have slipped in and make themselves look like theyre radqueer, when it goes against radqueer ideology in the first place

and besides.. why would a true nazi want to label themselves as queer? when, yknow, theyre literally one of the minorities they dragged into their genocide? lets do some basic research and use some common sense

thats exactly what i wrote yeah. whats your point

did you not read anything i said

i need you to read what i said very slowly and then process it because i cannot spell it out any clearer

maybe read my other reblogs !

are you illiterate on purpose

For all you idiots that can't tell the difference, being a murderer and a predator, are two different things. 'dave miller killed children' so what? So did his own children. Doesn't mean he was a fucking p3do you losers. Media Literacy is severely dead 🫩

yeaaaah…sorrryyy….Stupid anti. Do some research……..So friggin uneducated. Like, bro, W T H…..

i don't understand (non)individuals who are so radically against transnationalities saw some1 (whose username unsurprisingly had radnormal in it) calling transbulgarian racist can we PLEASE get real issues instead of thinking race = nationality yessss it's racist 4 me 2 be trisbritish oooooo

[prev]

I'm actually baffled at this because I have no idea where you're getting half of this from. You are making a lot of wild assumptions about me and my opinions.

Whilst there are many aspects to pro-paraphile ideology, and there is internal discourse and disagreements on how to go about helping paraphiles live normal lives, almost all of those points you mentioned are very popular pro-para opinions.

Therapists and medical professionals should absolutely help paraphiles and give them the resources and support they need. Medical intervention, such as libido suppressants, are necessary in a lot of extreme cases and should be an option. Especially to people who have offended. I have never said otherwise?

Also some of this is getting into shipcourse territory, which I am not touching with a 10ft pole.

Bro is just casually redefining the word abuse?

Abuse is generally defined as treating someone, or something, in an improper, harmful or morally wrong way.

(sources: Cambridge dictionary, merriam webster)

Consent is not directly mentioned in these definitions. However, if somebody consents to being slapped in the face, that is not abuse because you are not mistreating them. They have agreed to what is happening and understand the consequences. So, aside from a degree of physical trauma that the person is okay with, there is no long-term harm done.