One thing I cannot stand is whenever people act like Laurance is significantly better morality wise then Garroth (even before the sk transformation) or vise versa.
Many of the icky things they do are quite comparable despite their heavy personality and flaw differences.
I don't think it's a problem not to include stuff like their entitlement over Aphmau in your rewrite and headcanons, it's fiction and we don't always want to think about real life stuff like misogyny. Especially when they're more then that and they have so much flaws outside of that.
But idk, it ircks me when people continuesly give one of them the benefit of the doubt where they don't give the other. It's frankly hypocritical.
Ofcourse you can be a Garroth fan and criticise Laurance, or vise versa. But I personally just cannot stand it when people act like one of them is objectively much better then the other.