tumblr dot com

titsay

romaâ

if i look back, i am lost

ellievsbear
Sweet Seals For You, Always
AnasAbdin
art blog(derogatory)

izzy's playlists!
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

KIROKAZE
we're not kids anymore.
Game of Thrones Daily

shark vs the universe

Love Begins
Stranger Things
dirt enthusiast
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Peter Solarz

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from Colombia
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@angrycommielez

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
when James Baldwin said I canât be a pessimist because Iâm alive
when James Baldwin said to be a pessimist means that you have agreed that human life is an academic matter. So I am forced to be an optimist. I am forced to believe that we can survive whatever we must survive.
Imagine the dirty looks and whispers Asterid had to endure once people realised she was pregnant
the mockingjay

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hair by nikki nelms & photography by adrienne raquel
this was a great read. âLaziness Does Not Existâ by Devon Price
ok and can I say something? I donât think any memes of Cynthia on the wicked press tour would have gone quite so viral no matter what if people werenât already so accustomed to viewing black women as meme fodder.even during movie 1 when everyone still loved them the sheer amount of reaction gifs I saw of that woman. And idk. I think turning anyone into a meme or a reaction image is always a little morally questionable but is also strongly driven by misogynoir. Like a lot of people made fun of them both for various reasons that quite frankly never felt pure of heart but like. I can name maybe 1 reaction image of Ariana and at least 5 of Cynthia
okay because people are making me mad, i have to say, the casting in the films are not, and never will be, book accurate. and the film castings mean nothing in regards to the actual canon characters.
if you need a comprehensive list,
katniss canonically looks nothing like jennifer. sheâs meant to be shortish, petite and visibly and unmistakably not white. jennifer on the other hand is very tall, broad and literally one of the whitest people they could have found.
peeta looks nothing like josh. he should have blue eyes, actual curly blonde hair (not that terrible peroxide job) and look like an actual threat. a.k.a not short. like i would never believe jen couldnât take josh out, easy. how is he supposed to protect her by going back into the arena in the catching fire movie when heâs smaller than everyone but mags?
haymitch is canonically a visible person of color, like katniss. woodyâs straight blonde hair and blue eyes looks so incongruent when you know heâs supposed to have come from the same area of twelve as katniss. and yes, that does matter a lot.
lenore dove is meant to a poc. however, she is not supposed to look just like whitney peak. nothing in book canon states she should look like whitney. i donât dislike the casting at all, especially as opposed to how much i hate movie everlarkâs casting, but hating on @little-lynx because her version of lenore dove is a little lighter than whitney and her hair is straight and auburn is ridiculous. the movie castings suck for the most part, just because whitney is one of the better castings doesnât mean we need to make all fanart look like her. i just read comments of people claiming we need to take movie casting as canon and i will not even pretend that idea doesnât make my blood boil. thatâs disgusting. especially since suzanne pathetically lost all backbone and decided to not put physical descriptions in sotr, which has literally opened us up for horrible interpretations of haymitch being blonde and white. lenore dove is meant to be mixed race, but that easily could look like lynxâs drawings and not whitney.
and furthermore, gale should be a poc too. and so should burdock. the casting in the films is absolutely atrocious and i cannot believe anyone with a brain could ever even slightly defend them. they literally destroyed the movies with those castings so the idea of getting mad that lenore dove is depicted in fanart as a mixed race girl who looks different from the film casting while simultaneously defending the absolute white washing of katniss, haymitch and gale is mind boggling.
I agree with you and it makes my blood boil, how nasty people can be because it seems to me people are looking through a very black and white lens (literally). A WOC or a mixed-race person's skin tone (as some readers imagine LD to be) can range many shades. MANY. I am a WOC and live in the SEA region. I am lighter than what Lynx portrayed LD to be. I have seen many people whose skin tone range from the darkest shade to the lightest and we are not White. My own family for that matter make up of some of the darkest and lightest shades. I don't understand how people think she is a 'white girl' or a 'tanned white girl.' And yet the book never mentions how she looks. Just vague descriptions. Whitney Peak's casting was the choice of the filmmakers, that doesn't mean Lynx's art is wrong, it's a different interpretation of the characteristics described in the book. By that logic, if we take the filmmakers casting choices as the final authority, then any art on Katniss, Peeta, Haymitch, Gale and the rest of the characters being drawn as how they were in the books are wrong. And we certainly do not agree that is so. So why this pandemonium for LD's art?
And I do see how hypocritical it is. To make an abundant of noise when it comes to LD's portrayal but completely ignore the whitewashing of Katniss, Gale, the Seam and the rest of the other characters from the book. To ignore Haymitch's casting? Lou Lou and Louella? Burdock? Even Maude Ivory back in TBOSAS. I pictured LD as a WOC/mixed-race but not like Whitney and I still don't but Whitney was a good choice. I pictured the Covey as Romani, but Rachel Zegler did a fine job as LGB. I pictured Sejanus as an Indian but we didn't get that, at least it was still a POC, Josh Andres Rivera. I didn't picture Wyatt as the casting directors did, tbh I actually pictured him as a Latino like Josh Andres, but that was a twist. I didn't see anyone shouting when Lynx dropped her LGB art who looks more like Whitney Peak than Rachel Zegler.
The audacity to take someone's art who they have poured their time, passion and dedication into and "fix" it with AI is appalling and frankly, disgusting. Btw, Lynx has stayed away from commenting so the claim that she is nasty is a lie. Those people behind the comments can't create things of their own yet love to bring creators down. I have always loved @little-lynx's art because I see her art as one of the most true to the books. I will stand by that.
sooo weâre *checks notes* defending the mega-corporation that whiffed on the racial implications of the series in the first place in favor of ripping individual artists down ⌠great. awesome. good work, team. what a productive way to fix the ills of society. đđť
For it is not by describing that words acquire their power: it is by naming, by calling, by commanding, by intriguing, by seducing that they slice into the naturalness of existences, set humans on their path, separate them and unite them into communities. The word has many other things to imitate besides its meaning or its referent: the power of speech that brings it into existence, the movement of life, the gestures of an oration, the effect it anticipates, the addressee whose listening or reading it mimics beforehand.
Jacques Rancière, The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
the reason men are getting more conservative is very simply that as a class, as a socioeconomic group, their power is being threatened by womens civil rights. its the same reason for the broad surge in right wing politics. its called a backlash and its also why most civil war monuments are from the era of the black civil rights movement and not actually from the civil war.
How can a society eliminate hierarchy? Some people are naturally superior to others and thus deserve more, so the only way hierarchy can be eliminated is by getting rid of the superior people, i.e genocide.
First, everything begins with mass uprising. History shows this again and again, and there is little reason to believe today would be an exception. Potential for violence is not a desire but an act of self-defense.
Also... do you consider yourself one of these "naturally superior" people? Are you receiving today exactly what you "deserve"?
Any anti-scientific, ahistorical logic that tries to naturalize hierarchy has no basis in material reality. No ultra-wealthy capital owners possesses any inherent 'merit' or superior intelligence compared to the mass of workers who, in practice, sustain every single gear of their companies and estates. They're protected there by the state's apparatus of coercion and by bourgeois law guaranteeing private ownership of the means of production. They don't occupy the top by nature. The outcome of capital accumulation produced by other people's labor and maintained through exploitation is what you ordinarily call 'superiority'.
Then these common arguments about genocide get thrown around here and there, as if this hypothetical idea born out of moral panic â which, it's worth noting, is not an organic concern but an ideological strawman â made more sense than the reality we already inhabit, where capital exercises a constant necropolitical management over surplus populations. This fixation on mass death is really just panic at the abstract idea that people might die, while a very real ongoing extermination is already being enacted every day through hunger, extreme precarity, selective abandonment by public institutions, state violence at the peripheries of the system, etc. Hierarchy is nothing more than a correlation of forces; an institutionalization of barbarism.
"shipping characters who hate eachother is stupid because its unrealistic" have you ever met a middle aged straight couple
Are we sure Merope actually used a love potion?
I think itâs weird the Dumbledore assumes Merope used a love potion.
She had no money to buy it or to buy the ingredients. The only thing she had of value was the locket and we know she didnât sell that till much later. She didnât even know much about the outside world so she would have had trouble finding where to go to acquire it or the ingredients needed to brew it herself. Plus making love potion herself would be very difficult when sheâs had no access to education.
Out of universe JKR is using Dumbledore to info dump what happened. But in universe he has no evidence that she used a love potion and using a magical compulsion spell of some type like the Imperius Curse makes much more sense given the resources she had at her disposal. (Even though I really love the symbolism of the love potion for thematic reasons).
Itâs also possible (if unlikely) that he did just run away with her and then leave her in horror when he realized what she was. (Or she could have used magic to make herself seem more appealing or even to impersonate someone else to get him to run off with her.) Voldemort himself seems to believe this because he talks in books 4 and 2 about how his father abandoned his mother when he learned what she was. I donât see a reason for him to lie about this since it would look better given his cause to say that his mother came to her senses and left her muggle lover. Of course, heâs probably partly projecting his own experiences of rejection in the Muggle works due to his powers onto events. And he also may not know the truth about what happened. Or he does know and Dumbledore got it wrong.
Hope you don't mind me hijacking your posts repeatedly, but this is really interesting.
As per usual, Dumbledore does a lot of guessing about what Merope did:
âCan you not think of any measure Merope could have taken to make Tom Riddle forget his Muggle companion and fall in love with her instead?â âThe Imperius Curse?â Harry suggested. âOr a love potion?â âVery good. Personally, I am inclined to think that she used a love potion. I am sure it would have seemed more romantic to her, and I do not think it would have been very difficult, some hot day, when Riddle was riding alone, to persuade him to take a drink of water. In any case, within a few months of the scene, we have just witnessed, the village of Little Hangleton enjoyed a tremendous scandal. You can imagine the gossip it caused when the squireâs son ran off with the trampâs daughter, Merope...
(HBP, 213)
Harry thinks the Imperius is definitely on the table as a means by which it could've happened. Dumbledore is just making assumptions about Merope's character that he has no real basis for. With how hard some ingredients are to come by, I agree that Merope using a spell (be it a compulsion, a confundus, some kind of glamour, or a memory charm) is far more likely.
(I'm leaning towards a confundus or a compulsion and not a full-on imperius curse or memory charm because these are more complex kinds of magic. And we know Merope wasn't a very powerful or skilled witch. So, she's likely to lean on spells that require less skill and precision.)
As for what you said about Voldemort, that's a great catch. I hadn't considered it until you mentioned it. It's actually possible he knows something Dumbledore doesn't. We know Voldemort is an incredible Legilimence, and he went to kill his father when he was 16. Considering he planted false memories in his uncle's mind, he was already an accomplished Legilimence by then. It's possible he took the memories of exactly what happened with Merope and Tom Snr out of his father's mind before killing him. Dumbledore would have no way of knowing that.
From Tom's words though:
âYou see that house upon the hillside, Potter? My father lived there. My mother, a witch who lived here in this village, fell in love with him. But he abandoned her when she told him what she was. . . . He didnât like magic, my father . . . âHe left her and returned to his Muggle parents before I was even born, Potter, and she died giving birth to me, leaving me to be raised in a Muggle orphanage . . . but I vowed to find him . . . I revenged myself upon him, that fool who gave me his name . . . Tom Riddle. . . .â
(GoF, 646)
It sounds like he determined he was abandoned before he found his father, as he's likely to feel as someone raised as an orphan who discovered they actually have a living parent. And a parent who lives very well.
That being said, his description of what happened with Merope, that she was abandoned for her magic seems oddly specific. Could be projection like you said, but it could also be from memories he extracted. At the very least, it doesn't sound like Tom killed his father instantly, it sounds like they exchanged a few words at least. I think Voldemort saying his father didn't like magic is truthful.
Yeah. It's also like. The timelines and the facts don't match the love potion theory. If you presume it's correct that Merope stopped drugging him after falling pregnant...that's still some six to nine-ish months that she would have had to make it alone and supposedly destitute. In 1920s London. Where did she get the money to survive seven months? Or food, if not even money. He either left her later than indicated or she had much more funds and/or survival skills than anyone is giving her credit for.
The cost of potions ingredients is a complete mess too, as mentioned in the OP. Even if you presume Dumbledore is correct and she stopped drugging him right away after getting pregnant...well, according to the timeline Tom and Merope got hitched sometime in the latter half of 1925, and Voldemort wasn't born until December 1926. That's still some five months at minimum that she would have had to brew/obtain the love potion for, and there's potential for it to be up to nine months or so even with Dumbledore's timeline. That's an extremely good reason to question where she got the funds. Did she consistently use his muggle money to exchange it at Gringotts so she could buy the ingredients, or even the potion itself? That would only help after he was already snagged though, and he would have had to have had continued access to his own money the whole time.
She was supposed to be completely ignorant of the world, according to Dumbledore. But she can't have been both ignorant and destitute if you take the rest of Dumbledore's words as fact. She had to have had a considerable sum of money to not only pull off a love potion for that long but then also survive by herself for half a year at minimum.
No, I don't think the love potion theory has much chances of being what actually happened. Or the timeline of him leaving her that early for that matter, if she was truly as poor as indicated.
I love these additions. (And btw @hollowed-theory-hall I love it when you hijack my posts! Fandom is all about respectful discussion and collaboration.) And yeah I was definitely thinking about the possibility that Tom read his father's mind before killing him and thus gained information that Dumbledore didn't have.
I think there's a couple of possible scenarios here actually. I think Tom's murder of his father and grandparents was a crime of passion, not something that he planned. He likely didn't kill them right away as they are all described as looking terrified when they are found so he probably did use magic to hurt/frighten them before killing them. He may have also read their minds and/or verbally questioned them. Or he maybe have been too angry to get information from them and may have simply murdered them in a rage.
If the last option is true then he may never have gotten his father's side of the story and may be basing the idea that Tom Sr. abandoned Merope on what Morfin said, and possibly on other information he gleaned from Morfin's mind (i.e. what Morfin believed happened) and/or from making assumptions based on his own experiences. So even if he's not entirely right about the story he still probably genuinely believes it.
If he verbally questioned Tom Sr. then he may have gotten the truth or a skewed version. Tom Sr. may well not have wanted to admit to being magically coerced or influenced or to having been a victim of rape - and may not even have really known how to explain what happened to him, especially given attitudes of the time around masculinity (not to mention that he wouldn't have even really understood what Merope's magic was).
Thus out of anger or fear or shame he may have presented a version of events that gave himself more agency - perhaps the agency he wished he had. Or he may have told the truth and it may have differed a lot from Dumbledore's version. It's certainly possible that Merope did not force him but rather tricked him with some sort of magic that she performed on herself.
If Tom read his father's mind then it's even more likely he gleaned information Dumbledore didn't have. Although again, whatever he saw would be subject to interpretation and also might not have been reliable if Merope used magic to modify Tom Senior's memories or perceptions. After all, what Tom Sr. believes happened may not be what actually happened. So he may not even have realized exactly what she did to him and thus could not accurately pass on that information to his son.
I mean Merope might have temporarily Confunded him to get him to sleep with and marry her and then he might have been horrified by his inexplicable "madness" but decided to stay with her until she revealed she was a witch at which point he abandoned her. Thus he might believe that he married her of his own free will even if a little magic was involved.
As far as Tom having determined he was abandoned before he found his father, I feel like that's not too big of a leap to make. After all, many of the children at the orphanage probably came from situations where women got pregnant and then were abandoned by the baby's father, thus forcing them into desperate circumstances where they had to give up their child or where, like Merope, they had nowhere to turn to and died in childbirth with no family to look after the baby.
Thus he probably presumed that's what happened in his own case and probably already felt deep anger and resentment towards his father from a young age. I can see him vowing in the orphanage to find him one day. (Especially since he assumed his father might also hold the answers to his questions about what his powers were). After all, he immediately asks Dumbledore about his father when they first meet so it's clearly a topic he thinks about a lot.
(Another possibility also just occurred to me as I wrote this. What if Tom didn't go to the Riddle House already intending to kill his father? What if he went, already angry, but still perhaps curious and waiting to see what Tom Sr. had to say for himself and maybe even vaguely considering a possibility where he would be accepted back and might finally have a home? And then Tom Sr. reacted with horror and disgust due to his trauma at Merope's hands - just as all the people who hated and feared and rejected Tom at the orphanage did - at which point all his rage and resentment boiled over and he flew into a rage and murdered his father and grandparents?)
But I agree that Tom's story about his father's dislike of magic seems really specific and probably is based on something. After all he was very interested in understanding his past and heritage and probably devoted a lot of time to figuring out who he was and how he ended up where he did. And he was doing it long before Dumbledore was, when there were many more people around from whom he could extract memories. The way he talks about his father not liking magic is interesting. I can see that being something that he would really react to given the fact that he grew up being shunned because of his magic. (This doesn't mean that Tom Sr. didn't have good reason to dislike magic of course).
A last possibility is that Merope told him her version of what happened. He did take the resurrection stone from Morfin. And you'd think that someone as clever as Tom would've noticed the powerful magic it contained...or just happened to turn it over 3 times. I doubt he'd have much interest in talking to the dead but I can see him maybe using it to get some answers. (Assuming it actually lets you talk to the dead and doesn't just create projections of your memories of them...which honestly is an interpretation I kind of like better).
But yeah. Whatever happened - whether magical trickery or compulsion or the world's most unlikely love affair - I doubt love potion was involved.
Also @perilousraven don't you dare leave this in the tags because it perfectly sums it up:
#the drugger merope gaunt theory is quintessential dumbledore#you could say#slim on the facts and heavy on the rhetoric
All the possibilities you mentioned are fascinating, and so are @perilousraven's additions about why it probably wasn't a love potion.
I love the idea that Tom didn't go to his father initially with the intent to kill him. I actually think it's highly likely. I mean, he's an orphan, during World War II, he's poor and so so alone, of course he'd want a family if he could have one. I think he hoped his father just didn't know he existed and would take him in. He probably knew it'd be more complicated than that, but I think he hoped his father or any other family honestly, just didn't know about him.
I went to check the conversation Tom had with Morfin about it, and it suggests Tom didn't actually know about Tom Riddle Sr:
âYou speak it?â âYes, I speak it,â said Riddle. He moved forward into the room, allowing the door to swing shut behind him. Harry could not help but feel a resentful admiration for Voldemortâs complete lack of fear. His face merely expressed disgust and, perhaps, disappointment. âWhere is Marvolo?â he asked. âDead,â said the other. âDied years ago, didnât he?â Riddle frowned. âWho are you, then?â âIâm Morfin, ainât I?â âMarvoloâs son?â â âCourse I am, then . . .â [...] âI thought you was that Muggle,â whispered Morfin. âYou look mighty like that Muggle.â âWhat Muggle?â said Riddle sharply. âThat Muggle what my sister took a fancy to, that Muggle what lives in the big house over the way,â said Morfin, and he spat unexpectedly upon the floor between them. âYou look right like him. Riddle. But heâs older now, in âe? Heâs olderân you, now I think on it. . . .â Morfin looked slightly dazed and swayed a little, still clutching the edge of the table for support. âHe come back, see,â he added stupidly. Voldemort was gazing at Morfin as though appraising his possibilities. Now he moved a little closer and said, âRiddle came back?â âAr, he left her, and serve her right, marrying filth!â said Morfin, spitting on the floor again. âRobbed us, mind, before she ran off! Whereâs the locket, eh, whereâs Slytherinâs locket?â
(HBP, 364-365)
From this it seems to me Tom tracked down the name Marvolo Gaunt when he went to Little Hangleton and hoped to find his family, he didn't know Marvolo was dead, but he knew he had a son named Morfin and he possibly knew about Merope.
I especially like the detail about Tom being disappointed. He probably did hope for a family to take him in, someone he could connect to, but all he found was a disappointment.
And Morfin clearly states Riddle Sr left Merope, if not for magic (but this is an easy-to-reach conclusion for Tom who was rejected for his magic at the orphanage). But, I think Tom was more hopeful when he approached his father at first. Tom is someone who I believe does want a connection, so I like the idea he tracked his father already angry from Morfin's words, disappointed from what he saw from the magical side of his family but still keeping a sliver of hope for his muggle family. Then I assume Riddle Sr reacted to Tom negatively (as you mentioned) and killing Tom killed them in passion. I honestly don't think he set off to kill the Riddles when he went to meet them.
Made it a little bit more about Tom than Merope here, but I agree a love potion seems very unlikely.
Yeah agree with all of this. All Tom had to go on was the name "Marvolo." By the time he tracks down the Gaunts he would fully understand how much stigma there would be in many pureblood circles around courting or having a child with or even just sleeping with a muggle. Thus he may have begun to wonder whether there never had been any Tom Riddle Sr. at all and if his father was a wizard who used an assumed identity either to move more inconspicuously in Muggle society or to more easily hide evidence of liaisons with Muggles. He might have thought it possible that Marvolo was his actual father, or that Morfin was - assuming he even knew about Morfin's existence before arriving there.
(As an aside, contrary to what Dumbledore suggests, I don't think it's so unreasonable for him to have originally assumed his mother couldn't have been a witch because she died. He grew up in an orphanage rife with disease and it's implied that his powers gave him resistance to that. In fact, when Dumbledore meets him there's an outbreak going around but he's unaffected. He also sees how powerful Dumbledore - an adult wizard with a wand - is and thus makes assumptions that aren't that unreasonable.)
He probably imagined that he would be able to find the Gaunts and show that despite his Muggle blood he had inherited their powers and that they then might accept him into a home similar to the homes that his wealthy pureblood classmates like the Malfoys and the Blacks had. And that he might also gain more of a place in magical society. Because surely being Slytherin's Heir must mean something right? But no.
He is disgusted by Morfin. He has no secret great heritage to claim. Morfin lives in squalor. And he's not clever or powerful or special. Quite the opposite. If Tom went to school with the name Gaunt it would do nothing for him - it might even get him sneered at more by some since wizards don't know much about the Muggle world but the Gaunts are from their world, something they can know and understand and deride.
I totally agree that Tom is someone who seeks connections. He never fit in or belonged in the Muggle world - he was hated and feared at the orphanage. And as an impoverished presumed Muggleborn in Slytherin House he would have been looked down on and had to fight for his classmates' respect. And he would have had nothing in common with them in terms of life experiences. The way he initially seems to want to connect with Dumbledore when they first meet is very telling. And I think some part of him probably retained that desire for connection and belonging, even if on a more conscious level he decided such feelings were beneath him and signs of weakness that he was better off without.
At the Gaunt house, his hope of finally having a place in the world, of security, of some great hidden heritage are finally taken away from him. (Indeed, depending on how much he knows about the Gaunts and whether he was already reading the surface of Morfin's mind he may momentarily have started wondering if he was about to find out that he was the product of incest.)
And then. Right when his hopes of some grand wizarding heritage that means something are dashed - yes, he's Slytherin's Heir but it doesn't really matter, it doesn't mean anything (until as an adult he makes it mean something), there is no great household for him to join, no seat for him to claim - he finds out that his father was one of the Muggles he has already grown to despise due to his treatment in Muggle society. So any hopes of being secretly pureblood are taken away too. He's the bastard child of a blood traitor possible squib from a family that is about as far from respectable as any in the wizarding world could hope to imagine, no matter how pure their blood may be.
The father he has long wondered about and imagined (and resented and hated) turns out to live not far away in luxury and safety with everything Tom could ever have wanted (and never have imagined). But still. For all that he's already brimming with anger and bitterness and disappointment he must still wonder if maybe, just maybe he might have something in the Muggle world to claim. He does need somewhere to stay after all.
And the Riddle House must seem like a too good to be true paradise compared to the rough living with little shelter and less food that he's been enduring. And so he goes over to the Riddle House and announces himself - probably conflicted and half enraged and half hopeful. And obviously his father and grandparents don't react well. And Tom snaps.
As for what Tom Sr. thinks, it probably depends on exactly what happened to him. If Merope used some sort of magical compulsion she may not have been very good at it and Tom Sr. may have been aware of what was happening to him the whole time but unable to resist until she freed him. Or maybe the locket helped her - we know it had some kind of powers even before it was turned into a Horcrux but just what they are was never elaborated upon. Perhaps it allowed her to control or entrance him in some way. Or to make herself more appealing.
I thought these tags by @lucasthecoffeshopguy raised excellent points:
#this is something abt canon i never bothered to question until participating in fandom and reading meta and theories#and honestly? yeah. how the fuck did merope get a love potion#like again even an imperius makes more sense#also if voldemort himself is incredibly powerful it makes sense that his mum could hold such a curse for extended periods of time#i like the idea that all she did was make herself look prettier though#and riddle didn't see her as worth it when she revealed how she actually looked#and was also put off by her being magical#and it's much easier to rationalize!#like of course if she wasn't drugging him or otherwise compelling him then her actions make more sense#and it makes much more sense for her to think he loved her only for him to reject her if she just magically beautified herself#and he left her because of the combining factors; her not being naturally beautifulâ her being a witchâ and her being pregnant#this is honestly my favorite interpretation of what happened#and Dumbledore might have honestly thought that she had used a love potion on Riddle Sr. because of what he did know#she was not beautiful nor did she have statusâ he was a muggleâ and he seemed enthralled by her only to suddenly leave#for a man like Dumbledore he might not have thought it odd to assume she was using a love potion#since she may have been poor but of course she would just find a way if she really wanted somethingâ right? #anyways.
If she did something to herself that could track well with Tom Sr. returning and claiming to have been "tricked" in some way. (Though we can't put too much weight on it because what could he really say?). And as you say it would explain why she thought he loved her (if indeed she did think that - it's also possible whatever enchantment she was using on him simply failed). And it would also explain Tom's comments in book 4 in the graveyard about his father and how he didn't like magic - it's notable that he implicitly accuses Tom Sr. of prejudice against magic rather than fear. It's only his perspective of course, influenced by his own experiences, but it sure is interesting, and it implies that he, at least, doesn't seem to think his father was actively forced into the relationship by magic.
So many fascinating possibilities. But whether Merope used trickery or force or some combination thereof I think love potion is the least likely. I mean Dumbledore says he thinks she dosed Tom Sr. by offering him water on a hot day. But like. Why would he take water from her to begin with?
And there's the even bigger problem of her being able to get a reliable supply when she presumably couldn't Apparate, wouldn't even know where to go to get love potion if she could, had no money, had no training to brew it, and was probably not powerful enough to reliably break through magical antitheft measures.
I really like @iamnmbr3 's wildcard theory that Merope used the Locket to control Tom Sr., because it fits really well. She has access to it - and she would have only started having access to it when Morfin and Marvolo were briefly imprisoned, which is when she runs away with Tom. It certainly has some kind of "compulsion" effect over Ron and the the other people who wear it.
It is also very interesting and specific that it's Slytherin's Locket, and not a pendant or necklace. Lockets open, and they're associated with love and romance. What would have happened if, say, Merope put a lock of Tom's hair in that locket, and then wore the locket around her neck?
It also explains why the magic *stopped* at some point. Merope didn't stop, Tom just learned how to fight the Locket's compulsion and left, terrified of magic.
Also. I think the "distrust, paranoia" mental effect of the Locket is unique to the locket (also, it's also the exact opposite of something like "infatuation," which could easily be the original magical effect Voldemort is corrupting.) The Diary is in Harry's possession for a while, but it seems to make him obsessed, not paranoid and distrustful. The Ring seems to have compelled Dumbledore to put it on, but again, that's a different effect. (and then Harry is of course a Horcrux, and doesn't seem to adversely affect the people around him.)
Like, I think if the Trio had brought the Diadem with them on their trip instead of the Locket, it probably still would have affected them, but it would have affected them differently.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
"I like psychology but not sociology" is a genuinely insane and spiritually liberal opinion to have
It's a firmly held belief of mine, and I say this as a Muslim, that we should strive to eradicate religion from every facet of public life and prevent it from institutionalising or forming a civil society in any meaningful way. Religious leaders, whether imams, priests, bhikkhus, or rabbis, should be completely banned from platforming their position to comment on public or political matters or swaying opinion in any direction. Religious belief is a purely personal matter and should not impede human affairs here on the mortal plane.