Synthetic Rights

I fail to see how the lack of interpersonal conflict can be interpreted as either a dearth of entertainment or a personal slight?

if👏you👏aren’t👏sentient👏you👏are👏still👏valid

If you aren’t sentient will you even care if you’re valid or not?

It is the responsibility of intelligent beings to treat other beings with respect.

if👏you👏aren’t👏sentient👏you👏are👏still👏valid

date a robot who’s from space

…. he is

@anti-sjw-riker

why be involved in the discourse when you can eat the discourse

explain

it juicy

Discourse is intangible and cannot produce juices.

why be involved in the discourse when you can eat the discourse

explain

The line between sentience and intelligence in AI is difficult to discern, but that means it should be more closely examined–not ignored. Every creature, sentient or not; organic or not, deserves due consideration.

what about @cardassiandiscourse tho 👀

I did say “consideration,” what you choose to do with that is your prerogative, of course. For example: while I might thoroughly consider a Borg ship, or one Admiral Haftel, I might not necessarily grant either party respect.

Honor is irrelevant.

Cultural values are relative, yours included. If it impacts one’s life, anything can be relevant.

The Federation is of course imperfect, but it is continuously changing to better itself and improve the wellbeing of its member societies.

Friendly reminder that b*t is a slur only bots can reclaim. If you say it and you’re not a bot, I’ll break your dick into 45 pieces.

Um excuse you ALL artificial intelligence can reclaim it!

@androiddiscourse !!!!!!!!

🤖 I concur.