Danielle Binks

Here’s something I’ve had in the back of my mind for almost as long as I’ve been an Outlander fan.

Jamie and Claire have always and will always find each other. Literally.

Claire is born in 1918 and falls through time in 1945. She arrives in 1743, spends 3 years there, goes back to the 20th century, stays there until 1968, goes back to 1766. Presumably lives the rest of her days with Jamie until she dies (Diana Gabaldon has repeatedly said that she expects the series to end circa 1800, in Scotland, but then again she said that Book 5 would be called “King Farewell” and that there would only be one more book after that…but I digress…)

Anyway, the key point is that even if Jamie and Claire pass away circa 1800, Claire will be born again in 1918. She’ll fall through time again in 1945. She’ll meet Jamie again in 1743. Etc.

So they’re in an endless loop of finding each other, losing each other, and then finding each other again.

Here’s food for thought: If Jamie and Claire are in this loop - and have been in it countless times - what iteration are we reading about in the Books? Is this their 10th go-round? 100th?

"War is war and hell is hell."

But Ferngully?

Yeah, you couldn't make that shit today.

Specifically because of those right-wing boomers.

A critique of capitalism and it's effects on nature all embodied by a fruity Tim Curry villain who sings a song about how horny he is for pollution? And it's a kids film?!

“To those who do not know that the world is on fire, I have nothing to say.”

— Bertolt Brecht

Zoey pet sitting Derpy! Demon tigers are just giant neon-colored house cats.

Princess Tiana!!! ✨

Still experimenting with how I want these collages to look, but I’m liking this style a lot.