"I asked ChatGPT" Well, I asked Claude.

art blog(derogatory)

tannertan36

Janaina Medeiros

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Three Goblin Art

romaā

ē„ę„ / Permanent Vacation
Xuebing Du
noise dept.

shark vs the universe
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
šŖ¼
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Peter Solarz
DEAR READER
occasionally subtle
h

seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from Austria

seen from Türkiye

seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Maldives

seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@22degreehalo
"I asked ChatGPT" Well, I asked Claude.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Hard not to get the notion sometimes that in a sci-fi future Tumblrites would be the ones gung-ho about enslaving alien species because 'maybe you should care a bit more about marginalised people in poverty in your own communities???'
Wait what am I talking about lmao. That's already the way Americans on Tumblr talk about the third world!
no offence but what is tumblr's beef with people who love animals
Like. It is actually possible to be progressive and also want animals to be treated better. They are not in any way incompatible. In fact, they more often DO go together.
Animals do not deserve agency in the same way humans do but they still have a brain that processes experiences and can feel pain (even fish! We used to think fish can't feel pain but they do!) and it is entirely normal and reasonable to look at the world as it is and go 'yep, okay: this is the problem I'm personally going to focus my attention on.'
Also in general I hate the kind of rhetorical bait-and-switch where misogyny/racism/transphobia etc. isn't only the big hate crime stuff or even conscious discrimination but a wide array of distinct features about our society which disproportionately impact marginalised communities, some of which are hard to piece out even when you're the one experiencing it.
But also, misogyny/racism/transphobia is in every one of those instances The Worst Thing, Ever and everyone who engages with it is Irredeemable and the source of it is nothing other than Wild Mindless Brutal Hatred and everyone who disagrees is also a bigot.
In general I seriously dislike the interpretation of misogyny as 'hating women'. What an incredibly individual-focused descriptor of the problem, as though taking Some Guys and giving them mood stabilisers would grant total gendered equalization.
You want to talk about the evils of love? Some of the most misogynistic people out there love women. They think women are wonderful and gorgeous and kind and deserve their unrelenting protection! By saving them from ever being able to make decisions for themselves because of course those silly little women don't know any better!
You want to talk about hating women vs hating dogs? Plenty of people in the world love women in the same sort of way they love dogs, and that is also misogyny.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Genuinely I really don't want to be rude or dismissive or whatever but I am. Unbelievably confused.
In what world do y'all live in that people can just say 'ugh, I hate women' or something to that effect and everyone will just be like 'oh, okay' they way they would if you said you hated dogs???????
In a national survey of [trans & gender expansive] people assigned female or intersex at birth who had been pregnant [n=210], we found that more than one in three respondents had considered ending a pregnancy on their own without clinical supervision, and that nearly one in five had attempted to do so. Reported abortion methods ranged from ingesting herbs and vitamin C to physical trauma to testosterone use, among other unsafe or ineffective methods. Notably, not a single person reported using misoprostol or mifepristone ā the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended abortion medications ā to self-manage an abortion.
from Abortion attempts without clinical supervision among transgender, nonbinary and gender-expansive people in the United States by Moseson et al (2021).
In 2020 this study on cis women in the US found that 1.4% had ever attempted a self-managed abortion. This study from 2024 found that before the 2022 decision that struck down Roe vs Wade, 2.4% to 3.3% of cis women had ever self managed an abortion, and after 2022 that rose to 10.1%.
God, I wish people would pay this more attention. There's been massive attacks on both abortion/birth control and gender affirming care at the same time by the same people. You think the overlap would be obvious. You'd think it would be too obvious for people to not talk about how scary this is for trans people who can get pregnant, how this is the perfect example of how anti-trans violence is an inherent part of patriarchy & misogyny. And fucking yet!!!!!!
There's even the fact that the executive order defining sex as male and female and immutable, defined male and female as "a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces [gametes]." They worked "legal personhood starts at conception" into the executive order targeting trans people and no one talked about it. One must ask why we (and I mean both trans/queer people and self-identified feminists at large) are so goddamn allergic to talking about issues that affect trans people who can get pregnant! What is it about this group that makes it so we aren't compelling enough victims for anybody who claims to care about intersectionality to give a shit about!
Also gonna link this post because this is a prime fucking example of how cissexist feminism's refusal to theorize about how systemic institutional misogyny targets and shapes the lives of trans people who aren't women is so profoundly harmful. Because that's a major part of the answer here. People don't know how to be feminist about trans men & nb/gq people's oppression under patriarchy, because your feminism is cissexist even if you include (some) trans women & use people's pronouns.
I do think the ability to emoji-react is a net win for human communication. not only does it give you an outlet for 'I see and acknowledge this but don't have a verbal response' but it also adds a pleasing alethiometer element to things
my coworker announces that he's off to the dentist. someone reacts with a tooth emoji. is this a statement of dentist solidarity? a wish for my coworker to return with more (or fewer?) teeth than he set out with? simple word association? who can say
i like when fiction treats love as a more complicated force and not something that is inherently pure or redemptive. portray it as flawed and complex as any other human impulse. give me love as prejudice, love as possessive stasis, love as addiction, love as blindness, etc.
proposing a new genre of fiction called an anti-romance where u r presented w a couple at the start & the story is about their emotional journey towards a catastrophic break up

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
this is just obviously not true! you just don't know anything about what the working class of the rest of the world deal with!
Don't think I'll ever forgive Tumblr for going full 'accessibility is bad because if you're not trying as hard you'll lose the ability to do it' for the sole and entire purpose of having one extra reason to complain about tech.
really if you take any complaint about ai and replace ai with "complex math" you can see a bit more clearly on the topic
"complex math is ruining art/complex math art is not art" nonsense statements
"the government is employing complex math to automate extreme violences on other countries" something to consider and be concerned about
as a certified woman-lover I understand the instinct to say there's no such thing as a woman who isn't beautiful or all women are amazing etc. and i take a lot of comfort in loving women. and beauty is in the eye of the beholder etc. we can't say anyone is objectively attractive or not and "ugly" is a loaded worded riddled with a history of fatphobia, racism, and ableism. that all being said, all women don't have to be beautiful to deserve respect. women are allowed to be "ugly". if we hinge our respect for women solely on how much we love them then what happens when there are women we don't find attractive or nice or pleasant or who actually have no desire to be seen as attractive either. what about grandma? idgaf if you find old women hot, what about their unpaid labour? their rights??
image description: tags saying "#yes and #all women are beautiful #but yes i agree with the point #I'm just very bisexual". end description
i don't want to direct this at one specific person but like you cannot agree and then follow up with "all women are beautiful" anyway. your sexuality has nothing to do with women. they exist outside of you and your wants or preferences. and some women don't want to be beautiful. no matter what. no matter how you define beauty. some women are sick of beauty. some women were called beautiful as they were assaulted. like yeah it's not that serious but it also kinda is like. if we cannot respect the way women do or do not want to be perceived and their self actualisation over how we feel about them then it's over
Also it conflates sexual/romantic attraction to, like, political support?
And I know almost everyone would agree that *of course* they don't actually *mean* that you're doing something bad or wrong by not wanting to date women!
But when you compare the treatment of lesbians and bi women to aro/ace women like me... it sure becomes pretty obvious that people do see a difference, even if they don't want to admit it.
Like. Sorry but at the end of the day 'I only politically support people I want to fuck' is an extremely shitty stance regardless of if you try to paper it over with 'but ALL women are fuckable <3' after the fact.
theres definitely opinions you can have about games or literature that make me go "okay youre a bit of a tasteless rube" or "you don't know what you're talking about". but yknow i dont think that reflects on you as a person or anything, we're all like this in different areas. i bet any actual, like, cinephile looking at my letterboxd thinks the same thing about me and is justified for it, yknow?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Pro tip: it is very easy to conclude that people are engaging in bullshit arguments that are clearly nonsensical on your good, reasoned Tumblr posts if you simply assume that from the outset and refuse to even try to interpret reblogged additions as though they were written by an actual real-life person.
Or you could just. Like. Ignore them?
genuine question, not trying to be unkind: in what way is āmovies that are not made for childrenā an incomprehensibly complex idea
I don't know the full context of that conversation, but I can easily see why "movies that are not made for children" could be called an incomprehensible category.
It's because it could be defined in completely different ways, and includes content that cannot be meaningfully grouped together.
It can include movies that children are legally not allowed to watch (which is a shitty concept), movies made without children in mind, but that still attract children (like most action or horror movies), movies made by someone who's trying to be an edgelord on purpose because they believe "adult" media should be offensive (like a large part of cartoons that are marketed as for adults), movies that are considered too complex for children for some socially constructed reason.
In general, the idea that something is not made for children should invite skepsis and digging deeper.
The Brave Little Toaster (great movie btw) for instance is a good example of an animation that was targeted at teenagers and young adults but became popular with kids. It was picked up by an arthouse film distributor for the theatrical release and was nominated for an award at the film festival for being the best film there (it lost because it was animated).
So like, the brave little toaster is technically in the same category as A Serbian Film.
you did not seriously just compare an animated kids film called āthe brave little toasterā to a Serbian film, about a pornstar in a snuff film, which has been banned in multiple countries and cited by many as the most disturbing movie ever made, because they were both art films.
I'm not, I'm just saying that there's a very wide variety in adult movies
In what way is brave little toaster an adult movie I am genuinely asking, because the book is intended for children, and the movie is intended for children. A kidsā film that chooses to treat its subject matter in the same way as a film made for adults isnāt a movie made for adults, itās just a good kidsā film.
I'm crying, the brave little toaster is owned by Disney. Yes it was technically made by an independent studio but they needed Disney's permission and funding as Disney had owned film rights to the book for years by then.
...the comparison is extremely straightforward to me? They said that both The Brave Little Toaster and A Serbian Film were aimed at adults. So a category of 'films intended to be watched by adults' is, in that poster's argument, uselessly vague, because even films as different as those two would still be covered.
Like, the fact that A Serbian Film and The Brave Little Toaster are extremely different films is the entire point? A reducto ad absurdum of the original argument? So why are we acting like the poster was claiming that they are the same, or something?
Is this one of those 'I didn't read what you said but I saw these two titles and I'm pretty sure I got the gist of it. This makes no sense and you're crazy and stupid' occasions?