expected utility- 0

babies are crazy. someone explain how birth works on a metaphysical level

you are two poets telling a story at the same time, millions of choruses, over and over until they can sing no more. the song is a language. the song unfurls through time and space. it tears itself in half so that it can weld itself to a new duet, a new pas de deux, from four voices aching in unison. the name of the singers is deoxyribonucleic acid

babies are crazy. someone explain how birth works on a metaphysical level

"the oak sleeps in the acorn. the giant sequoia tree sleeps in its tiny seed. the bird waits in the egg. god waits for his unfoldment in man."

I wonder if there’s some historical significance (i.e. in indicating certain societal shifts) to how it seems that sometime after WW2-ish there was a far less penetrating theoretical grasp of the fallacy of misplaced concreteness, to use Whitehead’s term, more or less equivalent to the dualism between form and content Lukacs critiqued, which was also the central problem for the classical pragmatists (and the distinction between the classical pragmatists and e.g. Rorty on how much they grasped the problematic dualism of form and content is a very telling example of what I mean).

suffering constant humiliation at the hands of @crackretard

jealous that im neons favourite arent u

suffering constant humiliation at the hands of @crackretard

jealous that im neons favourite arent u

ex and i aint talked in over a month and she opens up with a pic of her foot what does this mean

it means she knows something we don't, bub.