Iâm so convinced that the reason ACOTAR is so divisive is because of its first person POV. It's not as divisive in TOG or CC (at least not to the same extent) because those series offer multiple POVs, we even get perspectives from side characters. If SJM really intended acotar to be taken seriously, newsflash: sheâs painfully miscalculated. The series, combined with its marketing that's more geared toward romance, didnât particularly seem to care much about worldbuilding or politics. Instead, it targeted an audience more interested in the male leads.
Rowan, Dorian, Hunt, and Ruhn are generally loved, but they arenât scrutinized or picked apart as much because the narratives in their books are less biased. Feyre was intentionally written as a naive character. She didnât know anything about the fae, she never really cared about politics, she just wanted to survive. And the readers felt that. We were forced to experience and understand the world only through Feyreâs limited knowledge and emotional lens. Which is... not great. Because SJM while not the worst writer isnât exactly a great one either.
Thatâs why fans are so deeply attached to the male characters instead of being feyre's ride or die. Because Feyre (and by extension us) are attached to them: Tamlin, Rhysand, etc. And thatâs okay in itself. But SJM didnât do a great job of streamlining her ideas, so when you even remotely think critically, you start seeing holes everywhere even if she didnât intend it that way or wasnât even aware of them.
The âI turned my brain offâ crowd of course doesnât see the nuance in Tamlinâs actions or acknowledge that Rhysand is widely manipulative. Thatâs why people try to justify Rhysandâs behavior in ACOSF by blaming Nesta as the lead narrator as if the only reason he seems bad (because she hates him etc.). If people realized itâs actually the opposite, they might understand where the âantisâ are coming from. Because no, Rhys isnât seen as bad because itâs Nestaâs book. Heâs seen as bad because weâre no longer trapped in the singular POV of a desperate, very young woman who thinks sheâs finally being loved the ârightâ way by a man the author tailor made for her.
ACOSF (and spoiler: CC3) is the point where we, as readers, are forced to admit that Rhys isnât all that great (even if SJM didnât intend it exactly like that). Whether we accept that is another story. And no, itâs not Nestaâs fault. Even with Cassianâs POV in the book, nothing truly absolves Rhysandâs actions. If anything, Cassianâs perspective amplifies how awful Rhysand is.
Now, Iâm not saying there arenât readers who understand all of this and still love Rhys or the inner circle and fine whatever. But the readers stuck in Feyreâs POV after her POV is over are the problem. The ones acting like the world ended because weâre no longer inside Feyreâs head, and now theyâre âforcedâ to follow the story of the sister weâve been told for three books was horrible. SJM didnât realize that her inability to write strong characters, compelling plots, or consistent worldbuilding would lead to this level of hostile discourse.
Maybe itâs not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but one of my favorite series is The Daevabad Trilogy. We get all three main charactersâ POVs in each book. And while there were some disappointments, no one was truly angry about who the FMC ended up with because while the romance mattered, it was never the only thing that mattered. The story offered so much more. The characters were equally well-developed, the politics were thoughtful, and the writing was strong enough that readers didnât walk away with fundamentally opposing interpretations. It felt like the work of an author who genuinely cared about crafting a cohesive, layered story. Not someone just hoping things would land well in the end.
Anyway, all of this is just my opinion of course. But honestly, it feels like a kind of social commentary. How white feminism in first person POV, combined with inconsistent writing, can lead to a very toxic fandom.