my syscourse stance is stop being assholes

HYPOTHETICAL: A person does not believe endogenic systems exist. They go into system spaces and fully acknowledge the labels, names, and origins of every system they meet; they do not reveal, ever, that they think endogenic systems do not exist. They encourage endogenic systems to use the label that is best for them, and acknowledge they are not the judge of someone else’s system.

Other traumagenic CDD systems, what's something you have in common with endogenic systems?

I'll share first

Personally, a few things are me is that I also prefer to see my systemhood as being individuals sharing a body & brain similar to what many non-traumagenic plurals see themselves (although not all do).

Ability to switch on command. See above.

Vivid innerworlds. See above.

The view of systemhood as a practiced thing. I have had to practice so much of my systemhood, because genuinely, I dissociate otherwise. I’ve had to learn to see myself, as well as my other parts. Some endogenic resources have helped with that, because they’re strongly focused on developing and seeing your parts.

Finding joy in splits. Many endogenic systems I’ve met celebrate when someone new joins their system; I’ve had to work hard to get there, but at this point, I’ve come to really appreciate when I split. It’s my brain coping. It’s nice to have community who hears, “split someone new,” and immediately goes, “Damn, sorry about the situation, but I’m so glad you’ve got someone new who can help!! What’s their name?” It’s not pity. It’s joy!

(Obligatory, “obviously not every system relates to every other kind of system, I’m just sharing my own experiences and own similarities I have found with SOME endogenic systems)

only engaging with the community to talk about how much they hate created plurals

the only evidence ever brought forward is faked screenshots

all other alleged evidence is based in hearsay, witness testimony is the weakest form of evidence

fundamentally believing that plurality is inherently a disability. which has... not been a belief of plurals at large since even before the coining of endogenic. the "natural multiplicity movement" even before the age of the internet made the distinction that they are not disabled by this aspect of themselves.

heavy reliance on appealing to emotion. they compare created plurals to radqueers, and they can't solidly define what radqueers believe. there's an alleged pipeline, but any alleged proof is always said to be in a place where no one else can verify it. comparisons to cults, pedophiles, and using the foreign invader of the community steretope. all appeals to emotion without making posts to detail the arguments with proof that others can verify

a heavy reliance on respectability politics. although aimed at created plurals first, since anti endos usually consider them to be the worst, these anons are also against spontaneous systems and protogenic systems explicitly. i believe that if they do accomplish their goals of dividing the community to turn against created plurals, that they would then aim for protogenic or spontaneous systems to try and get the community to divide even further

The first thing I had planned after the brackets were finished was a bonus round. This will not affect the 2025 winner — Freezing Cold System Takes took the win, no questions asked.

But there was one individual who was nominated no less than 5 times before I had to make a post about it. And I think it’s only fair to see what happens.

Greetings, fellow headmates, heartfolk, and curious onlookers!

I'm running for President of Syscourseria-- the title of Best Syscourser in the system community. Why? Because I believe in systemhood, plurality, unity, and most importantly… quality memes and warm takes.

What qualifies me to be president of Syscourse? Well, I come with not just experience-- but experiences, plural. I’ve got a full internal cabinet ready to go, complete with wildly differing opinions, snack preferences, and at least one personality who insists on being called “CEO of Vibes.” Whether it’s navigating academic theories or deciding which one of us left the lights on, I’ve got a whole think tank in my head. You want diverse perspectives? I’ve got them-- sometimes all at once. Voting on initiatives? We’ve already had three internal elections and a group chat meltdown. I’m basically a walking committee, and that’s what makes me perfect for the job.

I've won twice before, how bad could it be?

I’m here to represent all kinds of systems: DID, OSDD, endogenic, median, ones I can't pronounce-- if you’ve got headmates, I’ve got hugs.

Under my leadership, I promise:

A ban on gatekeeping disguised as “concern.”

Free headspace renovations for all systems (open floor plans encouraged).

And weekly community cuddle piles — consent required, dissociation optional.

Let’s talk about my opponent, Freezing Cold System Takes. The only candidate brave enough to say “who cares about plurality” while in a plural tag. If you want leadership that’s more lukewarm chaos and less frostbitten ideology, I think the choice is pretty clear.

They’ve proposed policies like:

Mandatory amnesia checks at every roleplay checkpoint

“Inner world license exams.” (We barely passed real driving, okay?)

Mandating all system members clock in and out like it's a psychic punch card

And their signature catchphrase: “I’m just saying what everyone’s thinking.”

Freezing Cold System Takes has some truly innovative policies—like their plan to standardize inner world time zones, as if our brains needed more scheduling conflicts. They also want to install a “vibe check checkpoint” between switches-- because nothing promotes mental wellness like being interrogated by the Internal Revenue of Stability. And don’t forget their initiative to assign every alter a job title-- because nothing builds trust like telling your demon protector they're now the Assistant Manager of Emotional Regulation.

Well, maybe we’re all thinking it’s time for a warmer take!

In conclusion, if elected, I promise to be:

Chaotic but kind.

Educational, but with memes.

And above all, someone who sees the whole system-- not just the fronters.

Vote for me, your friendly neighborhood syscourser. Together, we’ll build a community where everyone-- yes, even the inner world gremlins-- feels seen, heard, and slightly overstimulated in a loving way.

Thank you, and may your switches be smooth and your headspace have Wi-Fi.

the person whose littles understand sexuality are not the reason that person assaulted you.

the person who uses microlabels for any aspect of their identity is not the reason people are shitty to you about your identity.

I hope all child parts and littles can heal in a way that's best for them, and they can live a life without fear where they can express themselves

“Sometimes, people say they have DID/OSDD, but they’re mistaken, and that’s okay.”

Some of yall: Yeah, that’s absolutely true, this is a fine take.

“Sometimes, people say they have DID/OSDD, but they’re mistaken and are actually endogenic, and that’s okay.”

Those same people: HOW DARE YOU FUCKING FAKECLAIM PEOPLE!!!

that's the entire basis of what originscourse is about. you're not solving anything, i'm sorry.

nontraumagenics have plurality, headmates, and so on.

traumagenic have alters, multiplicity, and so on.

people with mixed experiences may use a variety of terms.

at least try and have a conversation with us about our experiences where we are at, instead of dictating what terms should fit us when you don't understand us. you don't talk to us, you don't read any of our experiences, you straight up don't believe us about what we experience.... and you think you're qualified to say what everyone that qualifies to be on the nontraumagenic spectrum should identify as?