paradoxical rectification
it turns out that particles described by quantum effects are only statistically likely to contain the same amount of temporal momentum as the rest of the system described. Â in other words, we can define the average speed of time, and yet, on average 50% of particles should be traveling into the future slightly faster, and 50% traveling slightly slower. Â with the net average being the obvious. Â 1 second per second. Â A sort of arbitrarily unitless measure. Â unless we define the first as a sort of temporal velocity.Â
this should abide by the exact same types of statistic mechanics which govern the sort of average particle speed of an oscillating group of particles. Â or perhaps a group of photons in which 50% is y and 50% is x polarized from the propagation z vector.Â
the goal then is to get a group of particles to behave in a controlled manner where they are moving in unison. Â it turns out the imaginary part of the wave function is what is being described here. and that bose einstein condensates offer a glimpse into the reality which is being hinted at. Â (maybe).Â
these though are still an uncontrolled group of temporally coherent particles, and they are still being dragged along by the temporal current, whatever the underlying mechanism might turn out to be.Â
the idea is to get these things to increase their oscillation amplitudes and thus the peak forward and reverse temporal velocities. Â the experiment should yield some strange effects indeed.Â
the particles should basically pulse into and out of existance. Â the problem is that that frequency tends to be so high, and the wavelengths so short, that even the lowly electron (which turns out to have the longest and thus most measurable wavelength) is still restrictively small.
while it might be possible to phase cohere a system of electrons talk about a job.Â
I cant say how the theory should progress. I can only say that I believe better mathematicians than I could hash out some equations which describe what is going on in a logically consistent way. Â that physicists more in tune with experiment than me could get a large group of atoms to jump into a higher temporal energy state. Â and that electrical engineers better than I could find a way to binary encode such temporal energy states with real data. Â In essence talking in a backwards vector.Â
the main problem I have seen in my own sort of simulations is the inherent volatility of such an ability.  that the ability to do this is slippery like quicksilver, or evaporates like the aether.Â
this is why we do not really see much in the way of causality acting strangely. Â because for the most part, any quantum non-local, non-temporal spookiness is buzzing at a frequency on the order of plank times, much too quick to notice. Â and that the net average is always such that causality is preserved.
but that through careful tuning, even a cheap and hacked together experiment might be able to cause a causal eddy current to form by which a binary message may be transmitted not across the spacial domain, but across a temporal one instead.Â











