How to calculate my maximum heart rate using a wrist based heart rate monitor.
I was hoping to write about my new nCube smart home hub today as it arrived last Friday, unfortunately three showstopping issues have occurred and the developers are looking at them and trying to fix them for me and the wider user group. Hopefully I will be able to give you a full run down on it next week.
In the meantime I wanted to talk about maximum heart rate tests.
I’ve had a little bit of a break from running since a disappointing performance in a marathon 3 months ago following an amazing gamified training experience I put together. But now I’m ready to get back to training again, and as someone who likes to run by heart rate (HR) as a guide to effort rather that pace it’s important my maximum HR is calibrated correctly so all my effort zones (usually percentages of your maximum HR) are accurate.
I’ve not done a maximum HR test for a year or so, and even then I think my lack of understanding about how a Garmin samples heart rate might have incorrectly reported* my max HR – so there is no harm in doing it again, and if you’ve never done one and always assumed that ‘220 – your age = maximum HR’ is a substitute measure I’d advise you to think again and if you have a HR monitor it is worth your time to do a proper test. It will only take 20-30 minutes, and only 1200m of that will be hard work!
1. Run 1.5 km as easily as you possibly can.
2. Run 400m as hard as you possibly can.
3. Recover for 2 minutes, this means run very easily (I’d not recommend stopping).
4. Repeat steps 2 & 3 until you have run 400m three times.
5. Cool down with a low effort run for 1km.
When you synchronise your HR data you’ll see where your heart rate jumps during the 400m efforts, the highest heart rate value you see recorded is your maximum HR.
Bonus content: how does Garmin calculate my HR?
First off, I’m only talking about how it seems to work in my experience, which has been with a Forerunner 225 predominantly.
It seems that the Garmin polls it’s sensors every 5 seconds and then averages the result against the previous 60 seconds results to show you your HR. This is fine as perhaps wrist based HR monitoring is too error prone to give real time output results and over the course of a long run it’s not really a problem.
Where it does become a problem though are interval sessions with short efforts, as you may find if you go from very low effort to very high effort you will get a lag in the HR reporting for 30 seconds until the earlier readings are pushed from the averaging for that previous 60 seconds.
As you can see in the data below where using the above method, the real time heart rate (in red) jumps as the interval begins but the average HR takes time to catch up as it is still averaging the HR shown on the device (in green).















