If women are superior in capacity to males–at least in the ways that matter in the modern context–then it stands to reason that males are there to follow. They are there to be of service, not to be served. If a woman wants to do something nice for a male, to please him, that is of course her prerogative. But prerogative is the key word. It is a woman’s prerogative. But to boil it down into basic terms, males are there to serve women. And if males are meant to serve, then it stands to reason their sex itself is meant to serve and please women. Ergo, how his sex is used is a woman’s prerogative. Ergo, it is natural and correct for males to wear chastity. Conversely, males in chastity naturally want to serve and obey the women in their lives. It’s an inevitable result. Which should further erase any doubt that there is anything perverse or abnormal about male chastity and orgasm management.
