Asking this genuinely with no ill intent and not a ploy to anger you as I am still a fan of Roger and Brian but do you think there is no reason for anyone to question their loyalty to and regard for Freddie when they green lit and became executive producers of a movie that completely painted a dearly departed friend as a egomaniacal, inconsiderate, extremely hedonistic asshole that he isn't while they came out being portrayed like angels? You have to be honest there's something a little wrong with that. Everyone that knew him personally that bothered to speak about the movie said they mischaracterized Freddie completely in the film. I don't want them to have portrayed Freddie as an angel, in fact I would've been appreciative if they showed his honest misgivings but they just made this one dimensional character with a voice of a god and a head filled with nothing but debauchery. I so badly want Queen to be a solid unit but this divided the fandom for good reason. It's not something easy to reconcile even if we're still fans.
Okay, first things first. I don't like the movie, and I haven't watched it in years. I also haven't really talked about it on this blog, so here's my take:
All of the band members are written poorly in it. They're all incredibly one-dimensional. In my opinion, Freddie is actually given the most depth since he's the main focus of the film. He's presented as an abrasive, inspirational, and deeply lonely man. Your criticism of how he's presented is valid, though. His negative sides are definitely exaggerated for dramatic effect... because this is a Hollywood Film (derogatory).
Roger is a hot-headed ladies' man who's snarky sometimes. That's it.
John has like... Three lines... and he could be replaced with a cardboard cutout. No one would notice tbh.
Brian is soft-spoken and makes heart eyes at Freddie. That's his entire character.
Like??? THEY'RE ALL WRITTEN TERRIBLY. The other band members come across as accessories to Freddie, and that also allows the narrative to be so easily interpreted as "Freddie was a tyrant and the other three were angels." No. Actually, the truth is that the narrative does Freddie a disservice by flattening him and his lifelong friends into maddeningly uninteresting caricatures of themselves.
Now, with that out of the way, I have to be completely honest with you. I think it's deeply unserious and messed up to question Roger and Brian's loyalty/love for Freddie over this fuckass movie. It's crucial that we try to separate fact from fiction here.
Fact: Roger and Brian (and John, who also greenlit this movie btw) knew Freddie for 20 years. They lived with him. They toured the world with him. They supported him as he found himself as a gay man in a deeply homophobic era. They rallied around him when he was diagnosed with AIDS. They were his escape and his second family while he was actively dying.
Fiction: Well, um, I—actually, I think they might've secretly hated him because..., uh, the movie that... the movie that they had no real control over made Freddie look less than favorable.
I'm sorry, anon. But I'm not gonna pretend that this isn't what you sound like. It sounds like you're devaluing some of the most important and enduring friendships in Freddie's life because you didn't like a movie. Because that's exactly what you're doing. And to me it's so insanely unserious.
You didn't know Freddie. Who the hell are you to question how close his actual friends and bandmates were to him?