If any of American followers voted for Trump today unfollow me.
Interview Vampire Daily

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
occasionally subtle
Color Me Curious

Origami Around
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Doug Jones

blake kathryn
The Stonewall Inn

🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
EXPECTATIONS
Mike Driver

tannertan36

shark vs the universe

bliss lane
Cosmic Funnies
🪼
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Canada

seen from Latvia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from France
seen from Ecuador
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
@theblueinformant
If any of American followers voted for Trump today unfollow me.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The more they talk about AES/AOC/Hasan, the less time they spend focusing on the other Senate races.
They're finally good for something
I'm reading a study on how nurses define the term 'drug seeking', and what makes them more likely to put the 'drug-seeker' label on a patient's charts and. well. let me just throw down some quotes
"Needy, unable to cope" (<- you try coping with chronic pain)
"Comfort seeking" (<- you mean.. having a preference for not being in pain.. how criminal)
"Using or trying to obtain drugs on a long-term, chronic base" (<- do you understand what 'chronic pain' means.)
"Asking for pain med then returning to sleep."
"States he’s level 10 pain, but does not appear to be in pain (or ‘5= on appearance)." (<- it is well-known that chronic pain patients tend not to display pain in the same way as acute pain patients)
"Dramatic response to pain" (<- notice how this directly contradicts the comment above. you cannot win)
"Gets IV med, then leaves unit to smoke or walk around" (<- wow requiring medication and then going off to do something you needed pain meds to be able to do is so suspicious)
the article itself put it best when it says: “some comments depict patients trying to apply sound pain management principles, such as continuing to take medication for persistent pain”. no wonder all the other literature on the matter says that women of colour are the most likely group to be labelled drug-seeking. this shit is entirely vibes-based (read: based on the prejudices of nurses and doctors)
The majority of Americans see the hijab as a symbol of oppression, whether it be the right because they don't like Islam period or the left-liberal side for feminist reasons, with moderates usually carrying a mixture of both. Whether you like it or not, that's the reality. The median voter is going to see AES' wife wearing hijab and dressing conservatively and see him in his muscle tees messing around with women revealing a lot of skin and conclude he's a massive hypocrite who oppresses his wife. That's what he's working against.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Oh lordy there's a clip of AES complaining about Oklahoma banning Sharia Law and comparing it to Native displacement.
Can’t comment on the comparison to indigenous displacement, but this isn’t the damning sound bite it’s presented as. Sharia is the name of Islam’s religious law /code of ethics.
To anyone who isn’t an Islamist (so, AES and most of his audience in the West), sharia has nothing to do with trying to implement Taliban-style control or Islam on a local/state/national governmental level; it’s just the religious commandments of Islam. It is to Islam what halacha is to Judaism. US muslims have sharia courts like we beit din, to make religious judgments and settle intracommunity disputes.
The law in question was extremely vague, completely useless, & unnecessary. We already have laws that prevent the establishment of religion. It’s called the 1st amendment. The only thing the law accomplished was encoding in law a disdain & fear of Muslim religious doctrine—itself a violation of the 1st amendment—and it was struck down for exactly that reason.
He’s responding to this the same way we would respond to any part of the US government banning “halacha law”, because to Muslims, sharia fulfills the same role in Islam as halacha does in Judaism. There were several high-profile bans like this, all overturned, because they were a massive overstep and a violation of the Constitution.
It's damaging because he has to appeal to the median Michigan voter - when he's already underwater - who isn't going to care about any of that. They're going to assume Sharia Law = forcing women to wear burka and everyone must read the Quran.
It doesn't matter what sharia law is, it's what the median voter thinks it is, and to the median voter sharia law is byword for religion backed oppression and sexism
Clueless (1995)
Getting annoyed by fandom is the mind killer. Getting annoyed by fandom is the little death that brings total obliteration.
"If Hasan's fans can be mobilized without alienating normies"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Until death, all defeat is psychological.
“Musk talks about Mars as a lifeboat for humanity, which is among the very stupidest things that someone could say,” says Adam Becker, an astrophysicist and author of the book More Everything Forever, which outlines the messianic, sci-fi fantasies of the tech oligarchs. “There are so many reasons why it’s such a bad idea, and this is not about, ‘Oh, we’ll never have the technology to live on Mars.’ That’s not what I’m saying. What I’m saying is that Earth is always going to be a better option no matter what happens to Earth. Like, we could get hit with an asteroid the size of the one that killed off the dinosaurs, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could explode every single nuclear weapon, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could have the worst-case scenario for climate change, and Earth would still be more habitable. Any cursory examination of any of the facts about Mars makes it very clear.”
What You’ve Suspected Is True: Billionaires Are Not Like Us
I really like sci-fi stories where people have to go off and terraform a planet, or figure out how to rebuild civilization after some disaster, or ideally both. "The last ark-ship leaving Earth right before it becomes uninhabitable" sort of deal. But lately I've been coming around to this same idea, that it will always be more practical to try to save Earth than to try to start over elsewhere.
I was reading one story where the apocalypse was impossibly-rising oceans. Like, water is appearing from *waves hand* the Earth's crust or something, and literally all dry surface land on Earth is going to become underwater in X years. Part of the story was about a giant research project to invent FTL to send a few hundred humans to a nearby star which might have a habitable planet. You know what they were hoping to find? A planet with liquid water. Their plan was to descend from their starship and restart civilization using just the tools they brought with them, on a world with no life and no breathable air and the wrong gravity and the wrong temperate and the wrong sunlight and the wrong day-night cycle, just because it had liquid water. You know where else has liquid water? The flooded Earth you just abandoned. Instead of researching starship technology, you could have spent that time loading up all the same civilization-restarter tools into boats.
And this is really true of any futuristic apocalypse scenario. If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth? Even if you smash an ice comet into Earth and destroy basically everything, Earth will still be more habitable than Mars! It'll still have roughly the right atmospheric pressure, and magnetic field, and heat balance, and it'll still have whatever life the comet didn't kill... Same with a starshade to cool Venus. Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations. Same with abandoning Sol System entirely and heading to another star. If an ark-ship arrived in a new star system and found Earth-but-choked-by-climate-change, the crew would be ecstatic. They would never have thought to get that lucky. So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
I'm sure he can go on Fox News and explain that as a rich white man, impoverishing the white middle class has crossover appeals to Republican voters.
Hey man. Not my mountain not my eagle not my liver. Not my problem
she would have been the best president of the modern era and I stand ten does down on that

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
as predicted, people in the notes who are mad about this can’t actually refute her point so they just resort to ad hominem attacks
The reason you can't be the next J R R Tolkien isn't because you don't have the talent, but because you're not the right kind of unwell. Tolkien wasn't bent for fantasy worldbuilding; he was bent for constructed languages, and got into fantasy worldbuilding in order to provide a material context in which to ground the notional evolution of the languages he invented. If you want to be the next Tolkien, you can't start with the worldbuilding; you've gotta find something extremely specific to fixate on, and develop it in such depth that inventing a world to contain it is genuinely the most logical next step.
#the best route is clearly to get really into a specific kink scenario and invent a world to justify it (via @salix03)
That's not even a joke. Developing a kink scenario so elaborate and so excruciatingly particular that it can only properly be contemplated in the frame of a world created specifically to contain it is genuinely closer to Tolkien's actual creative process than 99% of the stuff that plays at being heir to his legacy.