I'm currently more active on my side blog (diabolocracy).
!!Antiship DNI, thanks!!
This account is Proship.
Minors just don't contact me privately and we're gucci.
My Mature posts are marked Mature and if you see them then you lied about your age but I'm not your fucking babysitter 🤷
Mature posts that aren't marked Mature were posted by other people and I am not liable for their content.
Follow at your own discretion.
Hate anons will be put on blast and ridiculed ✌️
Instead of an extended DNI, I'll just say this: conservatives of any stripe will not have a fun time here. Especially American conservatives. Neither will Christians, Catholics, or Evangelicals if you're the type that puts your religion before all else and gets absolutely huffy at the mere thought of someone exercising their free will to do something your cringe god doesn't want you to do. The only ones who need to mind your god's wishes are those who follow him. There are other people.
As for me, I am The Supreme Chancellor of Edge Who Rescues Lost Bugs From the Side of the Road, or, as my friend has called me, "Chancellor Cringitine."
A meme that has somehow taken on human form and barely knows how to function as one. Life is suffering!
35/N/The Frigid North; happily 'degenerate' and 'problematic' sex-positive asexual trixic; the kind of socialist conservatives piss the bed about; diagnosed in less than fifteen minutes with schizoid personality disorder by a small town psychiatrist; demonolater and theistic Satanist with a focus on Beelzebub and Pazuzu although I've never formally said hi to either because social anxiety is a bitch.
Obligatory Pinned About
Because a description isn’t enough sometimes.
The runner of this blog is
- unabashedly Proship
- unabashedly Leftist
- unabashedly Satanic
Proship
Definition: Ship and let ship. Fiction is fiction. An anti-harassment stance. The ability to mind one’s own business. An abject disinterest in other people’s wank material.
Leftist
Definition: Pro-Socialism. Pro-UBI. Pro-LGBT+. Pro-choice. Anti-Capitalism. Someone that makes Conservatives, Republicans, TERFs, and so on, cry and piss the bed.
If something up there strikes your ire: block me. It’s that simple, babygirl.
Otherwise--well, I block liberally. If I’m in your DNI and I see you liking or reblogging my things I will block you for my own sake. If I come across a post tagged ‘proship dni’ I have a tendency to block every person who leaves a positive interaction, too, so 🤷
Some of you fuckers are crazy little bitches. If perchance you take it upon yourself to send some silly babble before I get the chance, I’ll respond in kind whilst mocking you with my friends on Discord.
For your own sake, since I know some “antis” have embarked upon such shenanigans with others in the past, don’t even try to send me gore. I know how to find things that will have you waking in a cold sweat at night. I’ve used and will use the archived Rotten as a drawing reference. I’ve born witness to the Pain Olympics. I used to be a casual /b/astard. I have no qualms about returning fire.
Besides, most of the examples I’ve seen the more unhinged ants send people is just plain fuckin weak. And yes, I will critique and mock your shitty excuse for shock imagery!
As for my art, some people on this site are weird about tagging. I, personally, don’t care. Go ham. If something looks shippy to you, it probably is.
Tag as kin/id/me or whatever too, I reeeeally don’t care, though as a forewarning you might be interacting with a kin twin (me) in some cases.
Icons are fine for personal use; reposting is a no unless it’s to an image archiving site like Gelbooru; I’m too stupid to know how to set up paypal or whatever so commissions are a no but art trades are a maybe if I’m in the mood (also I’m on ArtFight).
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've been seeing this term "radnormal" a bunch lately and it's been getting on my nerves. I don't consider myself pro-radqueer exactly but these "radnormals" bother me even more than RQs. It gives me the vibes of transmeds and such. "We're not like those other, nasty queers. We're actually normal!!" Does nobody realize that's what it sounds like? Has no one pointed this out amongst them?
e-7237
Petition to the House of Commons
Whereas:
Testimony from privacy regulators and experts before the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs identified significant regulatory gaps in the oversight of political party data practices in the Canada Elections Act as amended under Bill C-4, Part 4 as referenced in the committee’s report;
Regulators warned that political parties remain shielded from the level of independent enforcement, transparency, auditing and access rights required of other organizations across Canadian society;
Legislation governing personal information by political parties operating year round must equally protect the democratic rights of Canadians year round and not just during the election period and should avoid entrenching regulatory advantages for political parties themselves;
The recent proposed amendments allow political parties to operate under weaker privacy accountability standards than those imposed on citizens, businesses, and civil society organizations; and
Democratic confidence is damaged when those who write the rules for elections exempt themselves from the standards expected of everyone else.
We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons to oppose or repeal any changes to the Canada Elections Act, during the 45th Parliament, that have the effect of exempting political parties from privacy obligations that they are or were subject to; and impose enforceable privacy obligations equivalent to widely accepted Canadian fair information principles, including meaningful rights of access and independent oversight, prior to the next federal general election.
Today - June 30 - is the last day to flood the federal immigration levels consultation. The deadline is 11:59pm ET!
It will take you 15 minutes. Speak up for equal rights and dignity for migrants, and to oppose mass exclusions and deportation.
What is at stake
This consultation decides how many people get permanent residency, how many stay temporary, and for how long. It decides who gets exploited and how, and who gets deported.
Thousands of people are being pushed out of Canada every day. The Home Care Worker Pilots are closed until 2030. The Agri-Food Pilot has been closed since May 2025. Bill C-12 - now law - retroactively blocks people who have been here over a year from claiming refugee protection. Canada deported 22,500 people in 2025 - the highest annual total in history.
This is your moment to speak up against these policies, and to push for better ones.
Here's exactly what to do
Step 1: Go to the consultation form
https://forms-formulaires.alpha.canada.ca/en/id/cmp15luge003i01yt8nzf3jdf
The form sometimes fails - there is an option to save your answer on your device, do that at every step.
The form has a number of demographic questions followed by six open-ended questions. A few sentences per question is enough. You don't need to be detailed - you need to participate.
Step 2: Use our guide if you want help
We built a full guide with template answers for each question and tips on how to personalize your submission. Download the consultation guide here.
Step 3: Once you've submitted, let us know: https://actionnetwork.org/forms/immigrationlevels2026/
In solidarity,
Migrant Rights Network
PS: Save the date - mass mobilizations across the country on September 20: https://migrantrights.ca/events/sep20/
The federal government has brought in major changes to how pesticides are regulated in Canada, granting cabinet the power to authorize the u
The federal government has brought in major changes to how pesticides are regulated in Canada, granting cabinet the power to authorize their use — even pesticides Health Canada has deemed are unsafe.
Bill C-30 passed both the House of Commons and the Senate on Thursday before Parliament rose for the summer.
While the legislation largely deals with measures the federal government announced in its spring economic update, buried within it are major changes to Canada's Pest Control Products Act.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I’m a Canadian who uses DuckDuckGo. It’s so annoyingly our government can’t just leave the internet alone. We are not the UK and there is no need to follow Keir Starmer’s terrible decisions. Just make a bill that requires schools to teach about internet safety.
We are, however, part of the Commonwealth, unfortunately. What the UK and Australia do, of course they're going to try doing here, too 🙄. We might as well consider ourselves as being part of a Hivemind Government. The people at the head are going to try to do the same things. That is my understanding of it, mind you.
And I do agree, the better route would be educating the children on internet safety. Kids aren't born knowing how to keep themselves safe. You don't ban children from crossing roads on their own, you teach them how to cross roads safely.
An even better route (at least when combined with the above education), since all this hubbub is because "endless scrolling" and "algorithms" are predatory... Would be to pressure companies into getting rid of or fixing them. They're bad for adults too. Kids, infamously, grow up to become adults, who will become effected by those things anyway. But I digress
The Trump administration is cynically exploiting calls for stricter AI regulation to pass broad censorship measures at the federal level.
So, in terrible news, Trump's trying to pull some strings to pass this massive internet censorship bill, featuring all the kinds of internet censorship we're terrified of, including mandatory ID for accessing basically any website, specifically to crush state regulation of AI, because apparently this man will always see the moral bottom of the barrel and start digging.
So, if you live in the US and hate censorship and AI you know what to do, contact your congresspeople and tell them do not fucking dare let this through or so help us god...
In Canada, Bill C-22 is being forced through today. Bill C-22, AKA the "Lawful Access Act" will require an ambiguously defined group of online service providers to keep a record of all user metadata for up to 6 months (as of the third reading), as well as provide the government a backdoor to access it, anytime, with no warrant. In the bill, the definition of electronic service provider is broad enough to include any online service, including encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, email providers, banking apps, and cloud storage services.
While it has been amended slightly since the first reading, it is still dangerous and the Liberal majority government does not care about privacy concerns, dismissing those against Bill C-22 as “tinfoil hat” and “paranoid” conspiracy theories. (While, of course, they are pushing for Bill C-22, an age verification bill, and purposely overlooking generative AI as per their push for Canadians to adopt AI usage more at the same time.)
Already privacy focused companies such as Signal and DuckDuckGo have threatened to leave Canada completely over Bill C-22.
Email and/or call your local MPs, especially Liberal MPs. If you have done so already, contact others.
Please share this news, whether you are Canadian or not. Most news outlets have done very little coverage over these bills, and too few Canadians know of their existence.
Government just prematurely ended debate on Bill C-22
The federal government decided to use a so-called “guillotine” time-limit all further clause by clause on Bill C-22 to just 30 minutes.1 This will block ANY committee debate that scrutinizes the dangerous surveillance powers in Part 2 of the bill.2
The government wants to jam Bill C-22 today, and vote it through the House tomorrow (June 19). We’re calling on MPs of all parties to refuse to advance Part 2 without full committee study, but we need you to help turn the pressure up.
Message your MP and demand they reject Bill C-22 TODAY! And if you can also chip in to support the critical work at the Senate and over the summer to stop C-22, please give what you can. Stop Bill C-22! Donate $10 to stop mass surveillance!
Why do we need to stop Bill C-22? This bill includes provisions that will compromise the security of every person in Canada. It would let the Minister of Public Safety issue secret orders compelling apps, messaging services, and other providers to build government access into their systems — orders that come with mandatory, permanent gag rules and no meaningful judicial check.3
Experts and major privacy-focused companies condemned this portion of the bill. Signal, DuckDuckGo, Proton, Windscribe, NordVPN, Apple, and Meta are among those warning that C-22 threatens encryption — the very foundation of your online privacy.4
The government is forcing through a secret-order regime it cannot defend on the merits, on an artificial deadline of its own making. Part 2 should be split off and sent back, not rushed past the public before the summer break. Please take 30 seconds to send a message to your MP today. And if you can, give what you can to support our work defending Canadian privacy. Add your voice now! Chip in to defend Canadian privacy!
Whatever happens this Friday, our work is just starting. We heard rumours Senate would start studying this bill early so government could force C-22 this month; and by turning up the heat with our peers, we helped stop that. Through July, August and September, we will keep fighting for real study of C-22’s problems and amendments that remove its huge privacy problems.
But we’re a very small team, and right now our June drive is well below our target to stay viable through this year. If you’re able to give, please give now.
Thank you for all you do.
Matt at OpenMedia
P.S. The Liberal government is using their majority in Parliament to gag debate on the most reckless surveillance powers Canada has seen in a generation. They’ve signalled it wants Bill C-22 passed before the House rises tomorrow (June 19). Please join us in calling on MPS of all parties to reject Bill C-22 NOW!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i wrote another essay in the youtube comment section. copy-pasting it just cuz i can lul
social media bans are just a grab for your personal data. to prove you are above 16 you'll have to fork over your government id to a third party website that may or may not actually delete the data after they 'verify' you. (conveniently, this fact is left out of any polls that ask, "do you support banning kids from social media?" - a lot of people do. but a lot of those people do not in fact support uploading their government ids to 'verify' their age, or digital ids, etc so it's a useless statistic really, but it's one a government can point to and say 'look! the people agree!') you won't know until they get hacked & you see weird behavior going on with regards to strange phone calls about bank accounts you didn't set up, etc. who is any safer for that?
it's also ineffective, takes choice away from parents' regarding what their kids can or cannot handle while at the same time kids will just migrate to less moderated websites, and to any liberal who thinks it's a good idea: what the libs put in place, another party can use against you. like, duh? you don't want 'your' side to have powers you don't want to see used against you if your worst nightmare of a candidate gets in! use your heads.
also it's a stepping stone to digital id and eroding your choice of staying anonymous online. no thanks! people are crazy! i don't need some unhinged lunatic hunting me for sport because i said something they don't like on the internet! i've seen people do this over clashing opinions on CARTOONS…
like, do people say some hateful things online? sure. but like, even youtube has a BLOCK FEATURE. BLOCK THOSE PEOPLE. wow so ez. sure sure, it might feel nice and tingly if someone spouting some hateful things gets their comeuppance but um. look to our southern neighbor. it only takes one election cycle for the government to start demonizing trans people, for example. do you really want to make it easier for them to find those people? lol??
and then there's the fact that if this "id verification" nonsense spreads far enough it will just become the default. there are still many, many countries where just being gay is illegal. there are countries where being certain religions is scrutinized, or being indigenous, etc, etc. if online anonymity is eroded completely they won't be able to seek online community anymore. among everything else, id verification is homophobic.
i've also seen an uptick in "your account has been compromised! please give your id so we can verify that you're you" scams. i have watched people almost fall for them in real time with the only reason they didn't being that i spammed that they were a SCAM until the scam account blocked me. and it isn't just old people falling for this, the site this took place on is mostly people in their ~20-30s.
i would also consider it a national security issue. all that personal civilian data… or do we not matter? maybe we should encourage politicians' kids to use their parent's ids to verify themselves. maybe then it will matter?
and we all know it isn't about the kids anyway, it's about the $$data$$. it's no coincidence i'm sure that they tabled c-34 shortly after carney declared "ai for all."
if it was just about verifying your age, those 'verification' companies would advise you - for your own safety - to censor out everything but your face and your date of birth. they don't need ANYTHING ELSE… unless it isn't just to verify your age 🤔
if this idiocy passes here (and i sincerely hope it doesn't; as we can see in the uk it is actually rather unpopular and quite the career killer! NO ONE LIKES STARMER, and the age verification nonsense is part of why he is utterly loathed - i recommend anyone reading this to point this & everything else about why this is such a bad idea out to their MPs) i plan to send in one of those censored examples.
if it isn't accepted i will become very annoying for all involved. this is a promise. and i highly recommend others do the same :) either do not comply, or - if you must - send in an id with all unnecessary data points cut out of the image and raise a ruckus about it if it's "not enough." because again, they don't need your full legal NAME, your weight, your height, etc, to prove your AGE.
also i'm pretty sure our charter guarantees us freedom of expression. do under-16s not count as human anymore? are they not citizens? social media is also used as a place to share art, writing, and other projects. sooo…??
and if it's anything like australia's ban, then those kids (and adults who do not, or cannot, verify) run the risk of having all of their creative work deleted. not cool.
it doesn't even have to be creative work. laugh about those fancy photographs people take of their lattes all you want, yeah they're cringe, but they're also memories. social media has more or less taken the place of photo albums and scrap books and diaries.
governments try to say they'll make it safe. they'll fine sites if they don't really delete your data!!! but that doesn't really work. i'm sure they make more money keeping your data and selling it for ai training than they lose in any government fine. if they didn't, then they actually would delete that data because the pros wouldn't outweigh the cons (but most times, they don't… delete your data, that is).
in either case if your data gets leaked and sold you now have multiple copies of it probably being used by criminals to do who knows what and YOU have to deal with that while also juggling your busy life. yay!!!!
behold the sheer stupidity of politicians trying to regulate technologies that they don't understand! it's like none of them have ever been taught basic online safety (do not give out your personal data… like, say… YOUR GOVERNMENT ID)! but seeing as our "ai minister" is apparently technologically inept i guess that tracks. like, god, if people that useless can get a high ranking government position, maybe i should try for one. i at least went to trade school for some of this. but that probably makes me over qualified…
…and if i had to deal with people so brain-numbingly stupid every day i'd off myself, probably.
The current laws being enforced on the UK public is not to protect children & teenagers, it’s a blatant scheme disguised to fear-monger, isolate & control the country’s population. I don’t care if I’m sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist, the idea that people can no longer have privacy if they want to access the bare minimum online is absolutely bizarre and dystopian.
If you’re against these acts by our government and want to fight against unlawful forms of censorship, there’s a few things you can do; (will be updated as time passes — click on og post)
Support organisations such as Open Rights Group & Big Brother Watch
Sign petitions against Digital ID & The Online Safety Act
Contact & complain to your local MPs about your concerns around these new laws being put in place.
Attend any protests or rallies in your area if possible
Don’t give up, keep posting & sharing anything you can!
The U.K. doesn’t care about you or kids. It’s an authoritarian reign by the government to have the public under their dirty, oppressive, pro-genocidal hands.
UPDATES:
VPNs no longer work for iphones with newer ios updates
Google & Apple have until september to enforce their users into this new law which allows AI to scan their private photos / etc for nudity or anything deemed mature.
Bluesky was just added to the list of banned socials media sites and joins the following bans announced already — youtube, reddit, x, facebook, threads, twitch, kick, instagram & tiktok
boye @the-private-local-enemy - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook
