Tom Felton

This is why the Bracie thing was probably fake:

First: of course, anyone can make an email that matches b*******3@s*******.net

Second, and there’s a LOT of confusion about this: NEITHER of the two emails snake is using as proof are connected to the Lacie discord account. One is connected to B’s real instagram, and the second is connected to a random, completely blank and brand new instagram account that DM’d snake’s instagram pretending to be Britain’s friend Lacie asking snake to stop posting about Britain. Snake tries VERY hard to gloss over that fact and hide the old screenshots of the blank Lacie instagram account in an attempt to make people think that one of the emails is connected to the Lacie discord. It is NOT connected to the Lacie discord. It is impossible to see an account’s censored email address when doing “forgot my password” on discord. The ONLY thing that connects Britain’s real instagram to the Lacie discord is the fact that this random, brand new, completely blank instagram account with the name Lacie and the email b*******3@s*******.net DM’d snake, and then later, a girl named Lacie joined the discord.

3: it makes no sense for Britain to message snake as Lacie on instagram instead of tumblr or discord, snake’s two main platforms. Snake was barely ever on instagram. So why did Lacie reach out to her via insta? Well, because you can’t ping a tumblr or discord account’s email like snake did, you can ONLY do that to an instagram account.

It also makes no sense that Britain would make an instagram account pretending to be Britain’s friend Lacie who’s concerned about Britain getting cyber bullied, then make a discord with the same name pretending to be a completely different character partaking in that cyberbullying. But Snake’s whole scheme hinged on the fact that the Lacie discord was connected to the Lacie instagram, and since you can’t ping emails on discord, the only way to connect them was to make the two accounts share the same first name. If it really was Britain she would have just made the instagram and the discord under two different names.

4: I know people think Lacie predicted some things that Britain did, but here’s the thing. Lacie also made a LOT of prediction that did NOT come true. Snake likes to leave that part out and only show screenshots of the successful predictions. And the couple of predictions that Lacie got correct were vague and based on Britain’s consistent behavior at that time. In other words, it was pretty easy to guess what Britain was gonna do next at that point in time, she was baiting every other day. Snake is famous for throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks, and that’s exactly what Lacie did: she made a bunch of predictions, some stuck, some didn’t, and snake conveniently only talks about the ones that stuck. And you can’t go back and check the discord to see Lacie’s failed predictions because snake conveniently deleted the entire discord chat and started a new one after Lacie left.

She hasn’t scared me away, and she hasn’t “won.” I’m choosing to protect my own peace because I’m better than continuing to live inside this level of toxicity.

I’ve received death wishes, threats involving family members, and relentless misogynistic abuse towards other women. I don’t want or need any of that in my life.

I’m leaving this blog up, along with the tags and posts, so the information and screenshots remain available for anyone who wants to look for themselves.

But I’m stepping away from Tumblr now. This space has become far too toxic, and I refuse to let it keep taking up my time or affecting my real life.

You can find me on Instagram, where I’ll be going back to what I actually enjoy: fashion, community and having fun.

This isn’t defeat. It’s choosing peace.

Thank you to all the kind, supportive people I’ve met here and really- message me on instagram!

💕💕💕💕

It also infantilises the man, as though he can’t choose his own partner or decide how to spend his own money. Wealthy people naturally have access to expensive experiences; sharing those experiences with a partner does not automatically mean that partner is using them.

Britain is criticised if she apparently enjoys something luxurious, (even though we don’t actually know who paid for what), but when she reposts that affection and handwritten notes matter more than expensive gifts, she is criticised for that too. She just can’t win because the conclusion has already been chosen: whatever she does will be twisted into something negative. That isn’t concern or harmless gossip. It is a misogynistic stereotype being forced onto a woman people have already decided to dislike.

Girls and women who promote misogyny need to ask themselves what they’re getting from it. Is it to impress men? To appear tougher or “different” from other women? To undermine another woman or damage her relationship?

How about standing up for women instead? How about helping create a culture where the Tate brothers, Trump and misogynistic manosphere influencers are challenged rather than given endless platforms?

Once again, there is no proof that Britain paid nothing towards any of these trips, no proof that Tom funded everything, and no proof that this supposed Bahamas trip is even happening exactly as claimed.

But even if a wealthy man does take his girlfriend somewhere expensive… so what? Dating someone with money does not automatically make a woman a gold digger.

Britain is accused of only wanting Tom for his money, yet when she reposts something saying she values handwritten notes and affection over expensive gifts, that is somehow mocked too. She genuinely cannot win.

If she enjoys luxury, she’s using him. If she values affection, she’s a hypocrite. At some point it stops being “gossip” and starts looking like finding any possible excuse to criticise the same woman.

Talk about desperation. Embarrassing behaviour really.

And if I upset you that much, please feel free to unfollow and block me on ALL of your accounts.

“I’m messaging you regarding your daughter Bex.”

I’m 35 years old. Contacting my mother to discuss my online activity as though she is responsible for managing me was unnecessary and inappropriate.

“She has been cyberbullying and cyber-harassing a relative of mine.”

I have criticised a public blog and responded to content that was posted publicly. Disagreement and criticism are not automatically cyberbullying. If you believe a specific post violates a law or Tumblr’s rules, report that specific post through the proper channels.

“My relative has a Tumblr page where she discusses the relationship of an actor.”

That description leaves out the repeated personal attacks, misogynistic claims and serious allegations made about real people. My objection has never simply been that she holds a different opinion.

“Your daughter made a blog about my relative and has been cyberbullying her nonstop for months.”

The blog addresses public claims made by that account.

“My relative doesn’t know I’m telling you this.”

That is convenient, because it allows the person being defended to deny any involvement if the message is exposed. The account used to contact my mum was brand new and appeared to have been created solely to send this message.

I cannot prove who was behind the account, so I won’t claim that I can. But the attempt to create distance from the person at the centre of the dispute, while contacting my family anonymously, is exactly why this felt calculated rather than like a genuine attempt to resolve anything.

“She’s scared because this is causing her distress and anxiety.”

I don’t want anybody distressed. She is free to block me, report any post she believes breaches Tumblr’s rules and stop reading my blog. The same boundaries apply to both of us.

“Bex has even found her Instagram page.”

I requested to follow an account because I had been told it might belong to her and wanted to establish whether it was active. I did not publish private information from it, contact her relatives or use it to intimidate her.

By contrast, I was sent anonymous messages containing my real name and personal Instagram information alongside “I’d be careful if I was you,” followed by further references to my identity. Shortly afterwards, my mum was contacted directly. So presenting my viewing or requesting an Instagram account as threatening, while my personal details were being used to reach and pressure my family, is deeply hypocritical.

“An attorney has already been contacted.”

Anyone is entitled to seek legal advice. If an attorney needs to contact me, they can do so formally and directly. My mother is not my legal representative.

“If the harassment and bullying doesn’t stop, the police will be contacted.”

You are completely entitled to contact the police, and they are welcome to look through my blog in full.

Bullying and harassment involve things such as targeted abuse, threats, personal attacks, repeated unwanted contact, encouraging others to pile on, or sending people to harass someone.

So I’ll ask plainly: can anyone point to a post of mine that contains threats, targeted abuse, instructions for others to contact her, or personal attacks unrelated to what she has publicly posted?

Criticising public claims, challenging misinformation and disagreeing with someone’s behaviour are not automatically bullying simply because the person being criticised dislikes it.

If there is a specific post that is believed to cross a legal or platform boundary, then identify it and report it properly. Vague references to police in a message to my mum do not prove wrongdoing.

“I hope you have a talk with her.”

Again, I am a 35-year-old adult. My mum is not responsible for disciplining me over a Tumblr disagreement.

“Gossip blogs have always existed and having different opinions is normal.”

Different opinions are normal. Publishing degrading claims about women, presenting speculation as fact and making extreme allegations about real people are also open to criticism. A person cannot demand freedom to publish their opinion while arguing that nobody may publicly disagree with it.

“Bullying needs to be taken seriously.”

I agree, which is precisely why involving someone’s uninvolved family, tracing their personal accounts and using legal or police language to pressure their mother is not acceptable.

My position is simple: contact me directly, use Tumblr’s reporting process or have a legal representative contact me properly. Do not involve my mum or any other member of my family again.

I’m okay, genuinely. She hasn’t upset me.

What she did do was cross a very obvious boundary. Messaging someone’s real-life family over Tumblr drama is embarrassing behaviour, full stop.

I’m a 35-year-old woman. I don’t need anyone contacting my mum to “tell on me,” intimidate me or try to manage what I post online.

Messaging my real life mum is a wild move. I’m all for different opinions, debate and internet blogs but real life family members? Come off it. Threatening my mum is a bit too far.

Grow up. Get a life and find happiness because whatever is making your soul so sad and hateful for you to behave the way you do, needs to be addressed. Get therapy. Get a dog. I don’t care how you do it but get help.

I have no idea what time this was or what time the game was but it seems he was at the theatre! So pleased to see the dogs too ❤️

This was last night apparently, so Willow looks to be well ❤️ 🥰