Beware a long rant about autism and second language learning.
Concretely speaking, what has been the biggest challenge in the past some years is that I have been drawn to connecting with places whose dominant or official language [various tiny European languages] isnât one I already know ânaturallyâ from childhood. I think this is a vital part of why I keep getting âconfusedâ or âoverwhelmedâ or âmore autisticâ and this reason, unlike almost every other one, is not one that can be changed or evaded - probably ever. I have to accept that it will likely affect me for the rest of my life, and commit to working on developing a strategy to mitigate how it negatively affects my ability to function.
I like learning languages. I like reading, I like writing, I like analysing grammar. Learning the language of a place is also deeply emotionally fulfilling and necessary for feeling properly connected with a place - especially if I live there - because the language is part of how the place communicates. Super easy example: how disorienting is it if you canât read any of the signs on the roads, in the train station, in the grocery store?
I donât need to be fluent in [insert any tiny European language] to be able to communicate personally with the humans in that place, I know this, and I am so fucking tired of trying to explain for the 9000x time that this is not the point. I donât care about whether or not I can communicate with a person, this is about communication with the place, with my environment, and oh yes, environments do communicate with us. More complicated example: when I look at job postings and search by location, more than 3/4 of them specify that because the language of the working environment is [the local tiny European language], all applicants must be fluent in it. Can each individual employee there communicate totally fine in English? Definitely yes. Will there be communication barriers with individual people if someone was hired who only knew English? Surely not. But that is completely not the point. Will that person experience some kind of vague barrier in relation to the office environment? Yep!
If I for an extended period of time do not communicate with a single human, well, Iâve done this lots and itâs been alright. It causes some practical problems due to that I start to forget I actually still have a human form and how to function inside of one, which is primarily annoying and frustrating and takes a lot of energy to âget back out ofâ, so I very much do prefer to avoid this. In contrast, if I for an extended period of time feel like there are, for any number of reasons, significant and unresolvable communicative barriers between me and my spacial and geographical environment, I will become extremely depressed. I will feel like my soul is rotting and slowly slipping away. I might know how to function in my body and in front of other humans but there wonât be anything inside of the shell and I canât find words strong enough to indicate exactly how torturous such a condition is for me.
So language ability is necessary to feel connected with the only kinds of places that I seem to be drawn to anymore, and this is to establish or strengthen communication with the environment itself, both the âphysicalâ environment and the âculturalâ and institutional, not for personal connecting with individual humans. But in order to attain this ability to a truly sufficient degree (something I absolutely need) I am completely dependent on practice from fluid and informal personal interactions with individual humans (something I cannot do). It is not enough to read or listen or write blogs or write essays to the teacher or write for exams. With your native language, you could get away with having a total of 2 humans that you ever communicate in a fluid and informal way with. In a second language, if you want to improve within a reasonable amount of time, then that limitation will really hurt.Â
This fact is the cause of so ridiculously many problems. It may well be the primary reason why all of the coping and adaptive mechanisms I had developed between being a Very Dysfunctional Autistic Child in primary school and eventually perfected in early adulthood, do not work anymore. Without the base mechanism around maintaining certain kinds of boundaries and distance with other people (because I need people to practice the language with, I really cannot afford to do that) I will very quickly get confused and the amount of confusions I encounter in interactions will build up to a point of overwhelm which results in decreased ability to tolerate sensory stimulation and oh look, here comes all of the physical symptoms.Â
What would maintaining my original boundaries look like, then? It would almost certainly involve just accepting whenever people switched to English on me and took that as a sign to never try again. The key here is that I look to othersâ behaviour to tell me what is desired and acceptable social interaction, and when words contradict behaviour I have seemingly learned somewhere that behaviour speaks louder than words. People tell me âoh you donât need to learn this tiny language, we like to speak Englishâ? Ok, I wonât learn then, you just told me you donât prefer that. People tell me they are willing to practice with me but then switch to English the moment I seem to struggle for words and then donât switch back after I find the words? Thatâs behaviour contradicting verbalisation and Iâll interpret your behaviour as telling me that practicing with me is not your true preference, which I very much would like to respect. Is this how I prefer to interact? No, but that doesnât matter. Will I be able to feel seen, heard, or connected with in a genuine way if I just let the interaction continue the way the other person prefers? No, but that doesnât matter. Except for with established close friends, the primary focus of any unstructured (obviously, if the interaction happens in the context of a structure, like work, then the focus is also on that, in addition to ->) social interaction is to just get through it without annoying or offending the other person or triggering confusion in myself. Letting the other person guide the interaction seems to be relatively speaking the safest way to avoid annoying them. Having no hopes, desires and absolutely not any âpersonalâ agenda for the interaction prevents getting confused as a result of them somehow being in conflict with the other personâs intentions.
Prior to adopting this strategy, I was a quite annoying child. People bullied me and honestly I probably asked for it because I didnât âstay in lineâ and behave in a way that kept the bullies satisfied. Nowadays I carry 100% of the burden of uncertainty in social situations as internalised confusion and self blame in a frantic attempt to try to not annoy or offend the other person.Â
I look at all the people who are in my âcategoryâ of migrant (hey, isnât it even more confusing, that when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers the entire society suddenly expect them to be fluent asap) who have truly taken those words and behaviours to heart and just donât bother to learn the local language, or do so only as a limited personal (literary, linguistic, intellectual, "to read street signsâ, etc) interest but do not try to use it to speak with people and donât aim for âfluencyâ, and I canât help but envy them in a deep way. Itâs almost as if my environment actually wants me to be like them, and it is only I who is stubbornly saying this will lead to a level of connection that is too shallow to be acceptable for me. But itâs not the environment, is it? Itâs actually my inability to find the right kinds of people who do actually want me to learn, because of my inability to find people, right?Â