#www.pagan.com

FILE: ALIEN.INV AUTHOR: Unknown DATE: Unknown SUBJECT: Prophecy Theories: Alien Invasion "As the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be." -- Matthew 24:47 EXTRATERRESTRIAL ALIEN INVASION OR FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECY? To those familiar with the MJ-12/Project Aquarius materials. Note: The word "nephal" in Hebrew means "to fall;" Nephilim means "Fallen Ones." The Christian Bible speaks rather plainly about what would appear to be the UFO phenomenon of today. "And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord." -- Genesis 6:1-8 In every place in the Old Testament where "sons of God" are mentioned it refers to angels. But why would angels have sexual relationships with humans? Aren't the angels of God supposed to be holy and good? Not all of them... "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he [God] hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgement of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh...." --Jude 6-7 Ahhh.... so some of the angels (sons of God) left their own habitation and had sexual relations with humans. It is a simple matter to reason that some angels left heaven and came to earth. The Bible states that children were born of this union between angels and humans -- the children grew up and came to be the "mighty men of old -- men of renown." Some translations yield the term "giants of old," yet still others refer to these angel/human hybrids as "nephilim." Who, then, were these nephilim and who also were their fathers? We see in Numbers 13:32-33 a brief picture of the character of these "mighty men. And they [Israelites] brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants ther; and all the people that we saw in it are men of great stature. And there we saw giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their [nephilim] sight." In Deuteronomy 2:19-21 we see a bit more. "And when thou comest nigh over against the children of Ammon [God speaking to the Israelites], distress them not, nor meddle with them: for I will not give thee of the land of the children of Ammon [Egypt] any possession; because I [God] have given it unto the children of Lot for a possession. That [Egypt] also was accounted a land of giants: giants dwelt therein in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; A people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; but the Lord destroyed them before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead." What have we learned so far? That the children of the angels and human women were quite tall and barbarous. They lived in Egypt apparently before the destruction of the last age by flood. The Ammonites succeeded the Nephilim and referred to the Nephilim as "Zamzummims." It would appear that the destruction caused by the great flood -- the end of the last age -- was a direct result of the increasing evil done by humans and that evil appears to have come to a crescendo with the appearance on earth of the angel/human hybrid Nephilim. We have also learned that these angels "kept not their first estate, and left their habitation." Who, then, are these angels who left their first estate? Various discussion in Christian sources refer to these angels that have left their first estate. In the initial rebellion against God the leader of the rebellion was Satan/Lucifer. Lucifer and one-third of the angels were involved in that rebellion. These angels which have had sexual relations with the daughters of men are very clearly those under the guidance and leadership of Lucifer. We begin to see why a crescendo of evil in the world preceded the end of the last age by flood -- there were, according to the Bible's Old Testament, demonic/human hybrids living on earth at the end of that age. Psalms 78:48-49 says, "He [God] gave up their [human's] cattle also to the hail, and their flocks to hot thunderbolts. He cast upon them the fierceness of his anger, wrath, and indignation, and trouble, BY SENDING EVIL ANGELS AMONG THEM." Could this possibly be? Could it be true that the "humanoids" from the UFOs are none other than the legions of demons of Lucifer? And if this is true, just as happened before the end of the last age, are we now seeing a repeat of history in our own time? Are there now, in our midst, hybrid demon/human hybrids -- the "mighty men of old of great renown"; the Nephilim? I think you know the answers to these questions. We've had the answers placed before us for over 2000 years. In the book of Revelations are the acts of many Godly angels and Satan's demonic forces. It is fair to state that the book of Revelations is the description of the final battle between the forces of good and those of evil. In Revelations 12:7-10 we see, "And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon [Lucifer]; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old Serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." In Revelations 12:12 we see what happens next..."Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time." Finally we see in Revelations 13:4-... "And they [humans just prior to the end of the current age] worshipped the dragon [Satan/Lucifer] which gave power unto the beast [the human (or perhaps it might be Nephilim?) world dictator]: and they [humans] worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven." What then, in the final analysis, are we seeing in the UFO phenomenon and the abduction of humans, reports of women being impregnated and their fetuses being stolen, reports of genetic activities by the "humanoids," reports of cattle mutilations? All of this in the context of still other fulfillments of prophecy? Should we not know what the UFO phenomenon is? Should we not know what the purpose of the invaders is? Can it be made more clear? I conclude with Isaiah 14:12-17... "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities ther; that opened not the house of his prisoners?" Christians should not be surprised by this information for it is written, "Therefore my brethren when ye see these things come to pass look up for your salvation draweth nigh." and "As in the days of Noah were so shall the coming of the Son of man be." Will the world accept this explanation for the "humanoids" and the UFO phenomenon? No -- throughout the Tribulation period those humans on the earth at that time will not believe God and they will only blaspheme Him and His name. In fact, it is likely that they will see the "humanoids" or the "nephilim" as being able to save the world through their superior intelligence. Upcoming events shall show the truth for all to see as the deception of the Nephilim/EBEs continues to unfold.

Others also viewed:

Top Hedgefolk Sites Top Voodoo Spells Sites Top White Magic Sites Top Pagan Altar Sites Top Removing Black Magic Sites

As everyone has heard by now the predicted Rapture came and went without so much as a whimper. The massive earthquake that was supposed to herald the faithful being taken up into Heaven never struck, and the closest thing to unusual geological activity on May 21st was the eruption of Iceland's Grimsvoetn volcano, pictured above. Yesterday Jason Miller offered a prayer for those who waited for the Rapture accompanied by a photo of what has to be one of the Best Billboards Ever, and let me declare right now that I'm totally on board with making fun of the 2012 doomsayers when their apocalypse rolls around as well. I'm an equal opportunity offender, after all. One thing I will thank Harold Camping for is that it gave me a great party theme. Since my birthday is May 18th I was probably going to have a party this weekend anyway and Saturday was the most logical day, but the fact that it coincided with Camping's Rapture made it extra fun. I also think that we got more people over with the Rapture theme than we would have otherwise, including several friends I hadn't seen in a long time. So it worked out well for me, though I'm imagining that the Rapture believers are considerably less happy with the weekend's events. The thing is, as I've mentioned before the Rapture is fundamentally a silly idea, wasn't part of Christian belief until the 19th century, and likely is based at least in part on the mistranslation of "spirit" as "air" in the New Testament because Greek, like Hebrew, apparently uses the same word for both. While some have argued that all this is just a matter of religious belief that should be respected, to me Rapture-believers fall into the same camp as Young-Earth Creationists, and in fact Dispensationalists like Camping fall into that group as well because their chronologies are based on a creation date within the last ten thousand years or so. Both of these worldviews suffer from the problem that they fundamentally contradict known scientific principles. As I pointed out in my article on Creationism, science and religion don't necessarily have to be at odds but as soon as you start talking about events that take place in physical reality you have to take into account physical laws and tailor your interpretations to those conditions. That's what I do with my magical research and I don't think it's too much to ask that others do the same with their own spiritual systems. Here are a few questions about the Rapture. (1) Even if you know the date, what time zone do you use? The logical one would be Israel's, but it seems that Camping's folks were saying that it would be at 6 PM local time. Why? It's not as if the authors of the Bible knew anything about time zones. (2) If people are indeed supposed to just vanish where does all the energy go? E=MC^2 means that if just person's body were converted from matter to energy the resulting explosion would make a hydrogen bomb look like a firecracker. I suppose this technically only contradicts the "pre-tribulation" Rapture believers like Camping, since one could argue that the explosions as people are taken up into Heaven in fact destroy the world necessitating "a new Heaven and a new Earth" as predicted in the Book of Revelation, but still. (3) When the Bible tells us that the only people taken up into Heaven are the 144,000 elders why do "literalist" Dispensationalists claim that this in fact means everyone who believes? Similarly, the Book of Revelation says nothing about believers being taken up prior to the calamities that befall the world in the End Times, so how do the "pre-tribulation" folks arrive at this idea that Rapture comes first? (1) is logistical, (2) is scientific, and (3) is scriptural. But all of them point to specific problems with the whole Rapture idea. In religious terms (3) is the worst, for the simple reason that it replaces the declarations of scripture at odds with the Just-World Assumption and chooses the latter as its source of spiritual authority, giving it no authority whatsoever in the context of literalist Christianity. Anybody who thinks that God has an interest in sparing believers from the events of the Apocalypse by disintegrating them ahead of time should read their Bible more closely. In the Book of Revelation believers play an important role in the end times - if they all are spirited away, for example, who's going to do battle with the Beast at Armageddon? I suppose Jesus could take of it on his own, but that's not what the scripture says. It's only after the Beast is defeated that even the 144,000 are taken up into Heaven. At the 325 AD Council of Nicea the Book of Revelation was not accepted as Biblical canon. It was included amidst controversy at the Council of Carthage in 397 AD. In the 4th century, Gregory of Nazianzus and other bishops argued against including Revelation because of the difficulties of interpreting it and the risk of abuse. In the 16th century, Martin Luther initially considered it to be "neither apostolic nor prophetic" and stated that "Christ is neither taught nor known in it", and placed it in his Antilegomena, i.e. his list of questionable documents, though he did retract this view in later life. In the same century, John Calvin believed the book to be canonical, yet it was the only New Testament book on which he did not write a commentary. It remains the only book of the New Testament that is not read within the Divine Liturgy of the Eastern Orthodox Church, though it is included in Catholic and Protestant liturgies. One wonders how different Christianity would be today had Gregory won that argument with his completely reasonable assertion that the book was ripe for abuse, or if Martin Luther had eliminated it from the Protestant canon. I don't think it's much a stretch to posit that a world without Dispensationalism would be a much saner one, especially since extreme modern Christian ideologies like Dominionism evolved out of it. Going back to the title of this article, what indeed have we learned? Hopefully these events shed more light on the fact that "Left Behind" is fiction rather than fact, that so far every doomsayer that's arisen has been proven wrong, and that betting on some sort of magical end of the world is not only a sure loser but invites mockery. And no, people aren't making of you because God is testing you, they're making fun of you because what you're suggesting is simply ridiculous. It's better to live your life as well as you can rather than relying on the hope that all your flaws and failures will be washed away by the End Times. UPDATE: Harold Camping has issued a statement doubling down on his original End-Of-The-World date, October 21st. It's a Friday, so you know what that means - party at my place!

Other articles you might enjoy:

Top Black Magic Books Sites Top Spells For Beginners Sites Top Real Magic Sites Top Pentacle Sites Top Gods Sites