Michael J. Klarman on "freedom" as nonsense when divorced from the question of "Freedom for what?"… #whatIsGood -- Michael J. Klarman of Harvard Law School says that by itself negative freedom — freedom from without any definition of what our freedom is for — “is an empty concept,” a wax nose. Some people see freedom as a freedom from government interference in their lives, which comes from shirking federal agencies and reach. Others define freedom as freedom from discrimination, which comes through increased government regulation and enforcement. Some desire “freedom from want” and poverty while others desire only freedom of opportunity in the free market. Everyone insists that they are for “freedom,” but Klarman says that the term is meaningless unless you look at the value or good that the freedom is being invoked for. “Whether freedom is good or bad depends entirely on the particular substantive cause on behalf of which freedom is invoked.” -- Michael J. Klarman, “Rethinking the History of American Freedom,” William and Mary Law Review, vol. 42 (October, 2000). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=223776 - As quoted by Timothy Keller, Making Sense of God, 2016 (at Seattle, Washington)