i highly doubt victor hugo ever edited anything he ever wrote lmao
This answer is about to get exponentially geeky, I apologize beforehand.Ā
If weāre talking about self-editing, he did, if you see his manuscripts, especially in Les MisĆ©rables, theyāre heavily worked on, with entire paragraphs added and erased, various major changes and sometimes he even changed specific words for similar ones but not quite the same, which is fascinating to ponder on. One of my personal favorites of these is in Enjolrasās speech on āThe Horizon Which One Beholds from the Summit of a Barricadeā (Iām using the Hapgood translation for this response because itās the easiest available in English for me atm). The sentence ended up beingĀ āDe l'Ć©treinte de toutes les dĆ©solations jaillit la foiā but it was originally something along the lines of āDe l'Ć©treinte de toutes les dĆ©sespoirs jaillit lāespoirā, if I didnāt misread because I donāt speak French and itās not that easy to interpret it, but itās something like that:Ā
Hapgood translated it as āfrom the embrace of all desolations faith leaps forthā. This is fascinating because why did he change it? was it just because he was bothered by the repetition? Why did he choose āfaith/foiā, which has some religious-ish connotation, instead of āhope/espĆ©rerā, on that specific context, when voiced by Enjolras, of all people? (I had pondered on that before seeing the manuscript and when I came across it I was so surprised it was a change) Is it because itās stronger? Itās more of a sentence, a certainty that way, which does go much better with Enjolras, especially in this speech (and desolation, for that matter), so is it that? he used āfaithā on Enjolras before, for example when he described Grantaire, and he says heĀ āloved to watch faith soar in Enjolrasā (āaimait Ć voir dans Enjolras la foi planerā): Ā
He was very mindful and precise about the stuff he kept and didnāt and thatās a very cool self-editing job thatās fascinating to me both as an editor and author, especially in a piece of work that has so many different perspectives and time lapses and levels of narrative complexity.
Now, if weāre talking about external editing, which is what my tags were about, I meant it in its most general definition, editing is turning an original into a publication, I was referring to the people who had to help turn that monster of a manuscript into a printed edition for the very first time ever. Those were true heroes istg, because they had to make sense out of stuff like: Ā Ā
[Disclaimer: I am as far from a Hugo expert or Les Mis expert as you can get, I donāt have the authority to really go in depth with any of this, Iām just talking from my personal perspective as an editor, writer and fan and thought Iād share what I meant and expand].Ā