The idea to use Visual techniques to make successful impact, is not tight-lipped secret. In a more tacit way we have encountered these tools in many forms like the vision boards, using post-its, checklists, sifting and sorting ideas, metaphors etc, without being understood as tools for visual impact or the thought to take them to a meeting or a classroom.
Visual tools also appeals to people from non artistic background looking to make an impactful presentation, or carry out it their personal practice. The biggest benefit is they keep the discussions alive. Having a room to park ideas, discussions and annotations in a classroom/boardroom makes it easier to connect back to the topic. They do trigger curiosity, playfulness and while procrastinating help in offering of valuable inputs.
But do they generate a deeper understanding?
Yes, and as our brain processes more visuals than text, these tools help engage with learners who are otherwise detached.
Consideration to add to these tools are - 1) These tools resolve “how” but leave the “what” from the equation. As an enabler they are a trigger of conversation, but visual thinking or making thinking visible are two different ideas, it is a more complex idea. It is more of an orchestrated - facilitated patterns of conversation developed between a student and a teacher. For these tools to guarantee development of cognitive skills the routines need practice. The facilitator then genuinely needs to engage with students by asking probing, clarifying, questions and making assessments at every step. If my goal is to create an understanding about the of battle of Palassay, then using templates like Graphic History/context mapping etc help is comprehending the otherwise complexity of the text however what follows is more critical because that will take the student beyond the mastery of facts and figures. 2) Also, at some point David Sibbet speaks about making notes visual but the ideas is to translate into personal understanding and then draw. What we might need to look out for in a classroom scenario is, whether these visual notes are just a drawing of a teachers comments or are they actually translation of a students understanding or are they just literal word to sketch translation? Is it a mere distraction from the context? 3) At what level do these tools help the students think about thinking? What is its relationship with metacognition? Graphics and Visuals are great enablers to develop metacognition, by making thinking visible a teacher encourages a student to step back and look at where the thought came from, analyse what the route. Hence, I call Visual Leadership tools an arsenal of templates for impact more than a visual thinking tool because it does not consider patterns, routines and facilitator of these routines out of the equation. more without being understood as tools for visual impact or the thought to take them to a meeting or a classroom.














