#unionbudget2018

Interim Union Budget 2019-20 | Interim Budget 2019

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has safeguarded investors’ interest by making mutual fund houses more accountable.  Guidelines governing the industry are strict, clear, and one of the best in the global context.

But there is still more to do.

Although instances of mis-selling have been curbed, they haven’t stopped completely. Every time the capital market regulator comes out with stricter regulations, mutual fund houses and their channel partners find a way to achieve their objectives, perhaps, compromising the investors’ interest.

What should SEBI’s next action plan be?

1. Tighten the noose around close-ended schemes

Soon after the capital market regulator issued strict guidelines for open-ended mutual fund schemes for equity and debt both, fund houses floated more close-ended schemes.

New Fund Offers (NFOs) in the form of close-ended schemes not only help mutual fund houses grow their Assets Under Management (AUM), but also help escape the stringent rules applicable to open-ended schemes.

This is a major lacuna in the regulatory framework, and in the investors’ interest, the regulator must fix it with appropriate guidelines.

PersonalFN has highlighted the drawbacks of close-ended schemes on numerous occasions. Recently, it published a couple of articles to create awareness among investors:

5 Reasons To Avoid Close-ended Mutual Funds

Close-ended NFO Factories: Should You Invest?

The capital market regulator should take strict action against the irresponsible behaviour of mutual fund houses and their channel partners.

When the equity indices hit new highs, it’s relatively easy to convince, new investors. Mutual fund houses have mastered the art of playing with investors’ psyche to grow their AUM. They launch close-ended schemes, at a time, when valuations are stretched and committing more money to equity is risky.

As a result, most of the close-ended schemes underperform compared to their open-ended counterparts. In the name of offering stability to the scheme’s operations, “close-ended” nature of the schemes makes them less accountable and lethargic.

2. Do away with the dividend reinvestment option

Dividend reinvestment option, in our view, is a fool’s choice!

Those who do not want regular income should select growth option and those prefer to have occasional pay-outs, should choose dividend pay-out option.

Let’s first understand how these options work. Under growth options, the gains are accumulated and automatically retained and reinvested. In dividend option, at the discretion of the fund house, the gains are distributed among investors.

But under dividend reinvestment options, when the dividend is announced and paid, the proceeds are utilised to buy the units of the same fund at ex-dividend Net Asset Value (NAV).

(Image source: freeimages.com)

What’s the loss?

Dividends are tax-free in the hands of investors. But the mutual fund houses have to pay the dividend distribution tax before paying any dividend. Therefore, dividends aren’t totally tax-free.

Even as far as equity-oriented mutual fund schemes are concerned, the dividend option has become less attractive. As you may know, the Union Budget 2018 introduced dividend distribution tax @ 10% on equity-oriented mutual fund schemes.

Do you still think, dividend reinvestment option should stay?

Hopefully, the capital market regulator would also think on the similar lines.

PersonalFN has always encouraged investors to select their options carefully. Read some of the pertinent articles by clicking on the links below:

Should You Opt For Dividend Option Offered By Equity Funds Now  

Choose between dividend and growth option wisely

4 Myths About Dividends Declared By Mutual Funds Debunked

3. Discontinue monthly dividend options in balanced funds

As interest rates fell substantially over last three years, and sharply post-demonetisation; mutual funds started to attract conservative investors to balanced funds backed by a skewed narrative.

Since conservative investors have a strong preference for dividend-pay-outs, a few mutual fund houses launched monthly divided options.

(Image source: freeimages.com)

Recently, before the new financial year, many of mutual fund schemes paid dividends before dividend distribution tax on equity-oriented mutual funds being applicable. They were able to do so with huge gains made over last three-four years.

But such options are always misleading.

Under challenging market conditions, how many of these fund houses will be able to sustain the quantum of dividends they have distributed every month till now?

And let’s not forget, even if you as investors earn dividends and make losses on your capital, due to fall in the NAV post dividend distribution, the net effect is not positive.

4. End ‘copy-and-paste’ of liquid and liquid plus schemes

Observe carefully, many fund houses have similar liquid funds and liquid plus schemes (also known as ultra-short term schemes) in their product bouquet. It is challending to figure out the difference in their mandate and portfolio preferences.

But in this regard we are hopeful that the regulator will prudently regulate, as it did for scheme mergers of similar equity-oriented funds from the same mutual fund house.

5. Need to cap expense ratio of arbitrage funds

Arbitrage funds are classified as equity-oriented schemes for taxation purpose, but their return profile is comparable to that of liquid and liquid plus schemes (also known as ultra-short term schemes).

But their expense ratio is often near 1% –––rather high. Large commissions are paid to distributors to sell these funds.

(Image source: freeimages.com)

Until now, they were marketed as the tax-efficient alternatives to short-term debt schemes.

But soon after the government imposed dividend distribution tax and the long-term capital gains tax on equity-oriented schemes, they have lost their appeal.

PersonalFN has written some enlightening articles on arbitrage funds—comparing them with other available alternatives and explaining pros and cons of investing in them. Read:

Arbitrage Funds vs. Liquid Funds vs. Savings Bank A/C: How to Park Your Short-Term Funds

Arbitrage Funds: Do they work too hard for too little?  

The capital market regulator is playing a critical role in creating a fostering environment for all stakeholders: mutual fund houses, distributors, and investors.

Nonetheless, it is essential things that are beneficial for investors’ are done. If investors are happy, educated about invested, money will continue flow into mutual funds. Keeping this in mind, the regulator’s action on all the above mentioned issues would be crucial.

PersonalFN has always placed investors’ interest first!

We advise clients backed by thorough independent research, recognising their: risk profile, investment objectives, financial goals, and the investment time horizon before goals befall, among many other facets.  

PersonalFN believes, mutual fund investing is a serious business. At PersonalFN, our research team tests every mutual fund scheme through extensive scrutiny by a set exhaustive research process, consisting of both quantitative and qualitative parameters.

If you are looking at superlative research backed unbiased guidance to build a solid mutual fund portfolio, PersonalFN’ mutual fund research services are for you.

We recommend that you subscribe for our popular premium research service — FundSelect NOW!

FundSelectwill offer you honest and unbiased recommendations on which equity and debt mutual funds to Buy, Hold and Sell.

We will reveal: The 6 Ultimate Secrets that Helped Beat the Market By A Whopping 75%!

Only for a limited period, we are offering this exclusive service with loads of benefits that you cannot afford to miss. Subscribe now!

What’s more?

Only for the next few days…we are giving away our exclusive report, ‘The Super Investment Portfolio’, Absolutely Free to every new FundSelect subscriber.

So, don’t miss out this golden opportunity. Subscribe now!

Happy Investing!

The ideas in this article are inspired by Mr Pankaaj Maalde, and first appeared on ET and his blog.

The Union Budget is India’s most awaited, and often the most debated, policy announcement.

Industry leaders and economics experts lay threadbare the provisions and their likely impact, live on television channels. Stock-markets respond immediately and everyone tries to figure out what the budgetary proposals would translate to. Later, as the dust settles, some finer points emerge and new revelations pop up, often with a better understanding.

For a closer understanding of the budget, one must look at the vision government shares, in addition to the financials. Let’s take a look at 5 statements that we think are key to Union Budget 2018.

The top 5 policy statements in the Union Budget and what they mean for industry

The early lines pretty much sum the vision of the Union Budget 2018: “focus on strengthening agriculture and rural economy (and) infrastructure creation.”

“Online loan sanctioning facility for MSMEs will be revamped”

The government “will take additional measures to strengthen the environment for their (Venture Capital Funds (VCFs) and Angel Investors) growth and successful operation of alternative investment funds in India”.

“To invest in research, training, and skilling in robotics, artificial intelligence, digital manufacturing, big data analysis, quantum communication and internet of things, Department of Science & Technology will launch a Mission on Cyber-Physical Systems to support the establishment of centers of excellence.”

Implications: The government is betting big time on agri-based businesses and is willing to extend sizeable support by way of policy, taxation and infrastructural improvements.

Implications: The government is looking forward to building a better ease-of-doing-business environment for the MSMEs by easier, faster advances.

Implications: The key role VCFs and Angel Investors play in nurturing startups is being formally acknowledged. The government will attempt facilitating their initiatives.