Nearly 4K academic student employees, postdocs, academic researchers, supportive faculty, undergrads, and community members marched through the streets of Berkeley to the UC president’s mansion yesterday in support of a fair contract!
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Australia

seen from Russia

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland
seen from Yemen
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
Nearly 4K academic student employees, postdocs, academic researchers, supportive faculty, undergrads, and community members marched through the streets of Berkeley to the UC president’s mansion yesterday in support of a fair contract!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Testimony from a UC Davis TA
I care about class size not just because of pedagogical concerns but academic relationships as well. Currently I have two sections, one of which is about 25% smaller than the other, and the atmospheres in each class are like night and day. Particularly for folks in commonly marginalized groups, smaller classes open up spaces to speak and be heard, to have ideas and confidence validated and learning potential affirmed. And in the relational aspect of teaching, the difference here is also palpable. Having time to spend with students on their academic and general concerns can make forging a personal connection possible. Connections like these with instructors made education seem relevant and even possible for me as an undergraduate, and as an instructor I feel we owe our students nothing less. Our working conditions, of which class size is an integral part, are their learning conditions, and they deserve the time and attention small class sizes afford.
-Amanda Modell, graduate student in Cultural Studies, UC Davis
Testimony from a UC Davis Grad Student Researcher
My name is Karin Root. I am a PhD student in Sociology and currently work as a GSR for the Middle East/South Asian Studies department. The reason why I work as a GSR is because I can no longer work as a TA because of the 18-quarter limit.
In 8 years in the program, including summers, I have TAed or read 27 times, out of which only 2 where repeats. While I don't hold lectures, I have to know the material well enough to be able to teach my students and do the grading. Not only do I have to attend lecture, do the readings, prepare and run sections, but also do the grading and give them feedback.
Almost all of the grading in the social sciences at UCD is being done by TAs, and with increasing class sizes it becomes very difficult to do our work, especially when we are under time pressure. For example, I had one class of 93 students and had almost 650 short essays on 7 different questions to grade for the final. I asked the instructor twice to help me grade in order to submit the grades before the end of the quarter, but the instructor refused. Finally, I ended up not grading two questions and giving all students full points on them. I especially care about and reach out to struggling students, making personal contact with them, and working with them one-on-one to build their confidence, pass the class, and not drop out of university. Often struggling students have other work and family commitments that interfere with their school work. They need to learn how to do research, find information from different perspectives, present their findings and take a position, and support their arguments. As a state-supported university it is our mission to help students become critical analytical thinkers and the kind of employees that our state needs in the 21st century. With the increasing class size to TA ratios we can't give them the kind of help that they need. As graduate students we need living wages, affordable housing, summer fellowships, and more grants, credit for MAs, elimination of the 18 quarter rule, etc. As a GSR I clear a little under $1,600/mo and spend 75% of this on rent for me and my son. I also have $80,000 in student loans and don't qualify for any more. Like other students who spoke, I can only survive because my parents support me. I used to tell my students, "come talk with me if you are interested in grad school." I don't do that anymore. We are expected to do significant work on our research over the summer, but we usually have to work, and that interferes with our progress. We also don't have any pension or social security. Indeed, if I worked for McDonald's at least I would have social security and disability coverage. In the end, it is a matter of priorities. There is money for new buildings and high administrative salaries; there should be money for living wages, benefits, fellowships, and smaller class sizes. We need more money to be able to survive and to do our research and work as academic student workers!
UC is very confused about how much money their TAs make...
I hope the administration understands that this is not just a question of the 'crisis moment.' It's a long-term institutional and political question about the future of public education in the US.
Testimony from a UCSC member:
I would like to make the statement that I've TAed at two other State Universities (Ohio State and University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee), and taught as an adjunct at New York University, and I have never faced working conditions as demoralizing as I have here. I have been in two other unions and was terrified at the idea that we might strike -- this is the first time I have felt that it's our moral duty to strike under these working conditions. We need a living a wage that is on par with other universities and takes into account the obscenely high cost of living in Santa Cruz. We need more full-time faculty hires, so we are not TAing for adjuncts who are as angry and even more isolated than we are (our union should work on organizing with the lecturers), and we need class sizes and workloads that allow us to do our job well. We deserve it and our students deserve it. I hope the administration understands that this is not just a question of the 'crisis moment.' It's a long-term institutional and political question about the future of public education in the US. They have a chance to shape the university of the 21st century and the lives of a generation of thinkers and makers who have already been harshly impacted by the financial crisis. I would encourage them - and us - to think big, be visionary, and make a difference.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If management is so interested in teaching us about our "bad choices," perhaps they need to take this rhetoric to its logical conclusion. Perhaps they should just tell us that we made a bad choice in coming to the UC in the first place.Because management is certainly trying to make that true.
Testimony from Brian Malone
I am a graduate student in Literature at UC Santa Cruz. I have been here for a number of years and I have seen my standard of living decrease over time. I want to talk about how the UC has caused me and my colleagues to lose ground. In the last contract, we received a 2% raise per year. You can't see me right now, but I'm putting the word "raise" in quotation marks. Here's why. Over the three years under the previous contract, our salary increased by 6%. During that exact same time period, from 2010-2013, the Consumer Price Index increased by 7.3%. Which means that, when taking into account the rate of inflation, we took a 1.3% pay cut under that contract. Here's something else to take into account. Last year, in June of 2012, the rent on my apartment in Santa Cruz went up by 8%. This past summer, June 2013, my rent increased again by more than 7%. This is an increase of more than 16% in just over one year. During that same period, my salary increased--as you may recall--by 2%. So that's why I'm losing ground. Now, from following these current negotiations, I know that management likes to use the rhetoric of choice when TAs talk about how hard it is to live on what the UC pays us. They like to say that parking is a choice and having kids is a choice. And then they compare some of these choices to splurging on a fancy dinner. And I guess it is true--in the most trivial sense possible--that I've have chosen to live in an apartment in Santa Cruz in which the rent has been raised 16% in the last year. I've chosen to live in that apartment instead of, say, living in the Lit grad shared office or living in my car (and indeed, I know some colleagues who have done those things). But I've chosen instead to live in an apartment and I assume management would consider that another one of my bad choices that they shouldn't be held responsible for--like me spending a lot of money on a fancy meal or choosing to park on campus or if I were to, say, have kids. So if Management is so interested in teaching us about our bad choices, perhaps they need to take this rhetoric to its logical conclusion. Perhaps they should just tell us that we made a bad choice in coming to the UC in the first place. Because management is certainly trying to make that true.
A collective narrative of trying to make it on $17,000 a year: bargaining testimony from a UCSC student-worker
This is not an exhaustive list, but it’s exhausting.
Testimony from a UCSC PhD candidate