We are not going to reply or interact with it but over on Twitter there's a really long thread (50+ tweets) of someone who is trying to argue against endogenics but keeps going back and forth between describing them as all traumagenics in denial, and all are an entirely different kind of experience from traumagenics. In the same breath. Please, listen: you have to pick one. Or say some are one and some are the other. They can't be both at the same time. This is a very very basic logic thing. If A equals B is true, then the statement A does not equal B is false. And vice versa.











